Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
English Language Department, Faculty of Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
Abstract
The importance of incorporating graduate students' needs into academic writing courses has established a good reputation in EAP/ESP research. In addition, writing and publishing research articles (RA) is a universally established benchmark for students' academic flourish. The present study examines the status quo of academic writing courses in graduate programs to determine the extent academic writing needs of Applied Linguistics students, mainly RA writing needs, are addressed and practiced in the course. Drawing insights from the literature on academic writing, we developed two similar interview protocols for graduate students and course instructors to capture these key stakeholders' retrospective views on the course. We found that the course mainly focuses on proposal/thesis writing, not regarded as a critical need based on students' perspectives. Moreover, both students and instructors echoed the importance of RA writing as a significant area to be covered while emphasizing the need to integrate RA genre literacy into classroom practices. In this paper, we call for the reconsideration of students' primary needs in designing and running graduate writing programs and suggest that RA writing with a genre-based orientation become an instrumental component of academic writing courses in English as an Additional Language context (EAL).
Keywords
Abdulwahed Ahmed Ismail, S. (2011). Exploring Students' Perceptions of ESL Writing. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 73-83. doi:10.5539/elt.v4n2p73
Alinasab, M., Gholami, J., & Mohammadnia, Z. (2021). Genre-based revising strategies of graduate students in applied linguistics: Insights from term papers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 49, 100941. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100941
Asadifard, A., & Koosha, M. (2013). EFL Instructors and Student Writers' Perceptions on Academic Writing Reluctance. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(9), 1572-1578. doi:10.4304/tpls.3.9.1572-1578
Bazerman, C. (2005). Response to Anthony Fleury's liberal education and communication against the disciplines: A view from the world of writing. Communication Education, 54(1), 86–91.
Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 4-18.
Cargill, M., & O'Connor, P. (2006). Developing Chinese scientists' skills for publishing in English: Evaluating collaborating-colleague workshops based on genre analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 207-221.
Casanave, C. P. (2002). Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Charles, M. (2007). Reconciling top-down and bottom-up approaches to graduate writing: Using a corpus to teach rhetorical functions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(4), 289-302.
Cheng, A. (2011). Language features as the pathways to genre: Students' attention to non-prototypical features and its implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 69–82.
Clavero, M. (2010). "Awkward wording. Rephrase": Linguistic injustice in ecological journals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 552–553
Cortes, V. (2013). The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002.
Cortes, V. (2019). Considering the importance of L2 learners' writing needs. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, 100679. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100679.
Dong, J., & Lu, X. (2020). Promoting discipline-specific genre competence with corpus-based genre analysis activities. English for Specific Purposes, 58, 138-154.
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. NY: Oxford
Flowerdew, J. (2019). The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality. Language Teaching, 52, 249-260.
Flowerdew, J., & Wang, S. H. (2016). Author's editor revisions to manuscripts published in international journals. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32(2), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.03.004.
Giraldo, F. (2019). An English for Research Publication Purposes Course: Gains, Challenges, and Perceptions. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 18, 198-220.
Goodfellow, R. (2005) Academic literacies and e leaning: a critical approach to writing in the online university. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(7-8), 481–494.
Gray, T., Madson, L., & Jackson, M. (2018). Publish & Flourish: Helping scholars become better, more prolific writers. To Improve the Academy, 37(2), 243-256.
Huang, J. C. (2010). Publishing and learning writing for publication in English: Perspectives of NNES PhD students in science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 33-44.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. London/New York: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2013). Writing in the university: education, knowledge and reputation. Language Teaching, 46(1), 53–70.
Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58-69.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2015). Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes. 37, 74-86.
Le, T. N. P., & Harrington, M. (2015). Phraseology used to comment on results in the discussion section of applied linguistics quantitative research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 39, 45-61.
Lea, M. R. (2004).Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 739–756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 0307507042000287230.
Li, L., Franken, M., & Wu, S. (2020). Bundle-driven move analysis: Sentence initial lexical bundles in PhD abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 60, 85-97.
Li, Y., & Flowerdew, J. (2020). Teaching English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP): A review of language teachers' pedagogical initiatives. English for Specific Purposes, 59, 29-41.
Lillis, T. M. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.
Lillis, T. M. (2003). Student writing as 'Academic Literacies': drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design. Language and Education, 17(3), 192–207.
Lillis, T., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 5–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/japl.v4i1.5.
Lim, J. M.-H. (2012). How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based investigation into mamagement researchers' rhetorical steps and linguistics mechanisms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 229-245.
Lim, J. M.-H., & Luo, X. (2020). Writing Research Questions and Hypotheses: A Genre-Based Investigation into Writers' Linguistic Resources in Social Sciences. ESP Today, 8(2), 206–226. doi:10.18485/esptoday.2020.8.2.2.
Mazdayasna, G., & Tahririan, M. (2008). Developing a profile of the ESP needs of Iranian students: The case of students of nursing and midwifery. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(4), 277-289.
Morton, J. Storch, N., & Thampson, C. (2015). What our students tell us: Perceptions of three multilingual students on their academic writing in first year. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 1-13.
Mur Duenas, M. (2012). Getting research published internationally in English: An ethnographic account of a team of finance Spanish scholars' struggles. Iberica, 24, 139-156.
National Syllabus for Applied Linguistics (1986). Council for Higher Education, Iran. Available at: https://www.msrt.ir/enAfterwards.
National Syllabus for Applied Linguistics (2016). Council for Higher Education, Iran. Available at: https://www.msrt.ir/enAfterwards.
Phuong Dzung, P. (2008b). How can learning about the structure of research articles help international students? In Paper presented at 19th ISANA international conference, Auckland.
Prior, P. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: a sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sadeghi, K., & Alinasab, M. (2020). Academic conflict in Applied Linguistics research article discussions: The case of native and non-native writers. English for Specific Purposes, 59, 17-28.
Salager-Meyer, F. (2008). Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 121-132.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tardy, C. M. (2006). Appropriation, ownership, and agency: negotiating teacher feedback in academic settings. In K. Hyland, & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: contexts and issues (pp. 60–78). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tardy, C. M. (2009). Building genre knowledge. West Lafayette: Parlor Press.
Tardy, M. C. (2016). Beyond Convention: Genre Innovation in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Wang, W. (2017). Learner characteristics in an EAP thesis-writing class: Looking into students' responses to genre-based instruction and pedagogical tasks. English for Specific Purposes, 47, 52-60.
Wingate, U. (2012). Using academic literacies and genre-based models for academic writing instruction: a 'literacy' journey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 26–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.006.
', './data/jtls/coversheet/cover_en.jpg'))