<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2017.24678.2214</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4178_db98ff9a1b3a4a185f943cd00d18302e.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>Developing a Questionnaire for Assessing Iranian EFL Teachers’ Critical Cultural Awareness (CCA)</article-title>
			        <subtitle>Developing a questionnaire for assessing Iranian EFL teachers' critical cultural awareness (CCA)</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Atai</surname>
			            <given-names>Mahmood Reza</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Babaii</surname>
			            <given-names>Esmat</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Kharazmi University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c3" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Taghipour Bazargani</surname>
			            <given-names>Davood</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Ph.D. Candidate of TEFL, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>07</month>
			        <year>2017</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>36</volume>
			      <issue>2</issue>
			      <fpage>1</fpage>
			      <lpage>38</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>01</day>
			          <month>03</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>05</day>
			          <month>09</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2017, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4178.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4178.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>Critical cultural awareness as a component of intercultural competence (Byram, 1997, 2012) has received the extensive attention of scholars in the fields of language teaching, cultural studies, ethnic studies, gender studies, communication studies, etc. in the recent decades. However, no instrument has ever been developed to assess this construct among Iranian EFL teachers. To fill this gap, in the first phase of the present study a theoretical framework for critical cultural awareness and its components was developed through reviewing the literature and conducting interviews with ELT experts. In the second phase, a questionnaire was developed and piloted with 370 participants who were available and willing to participate in the study. More specifically, the 37 items of the newly-developed ‘CCA&#039; scale were subjected to principal component analysis which revealed the presence of three components. These phases led to the development of a questionnaire with three components and 37 items: (1) ‘CCA in ELT Programs&#039; including 20 items, (2) ‘CCA in ELT Textbooks and Materials&#039; including 13 items, and (3) ‘CCA in General Terms&#039; including four items. The findings of this study may shed some light on this fuzzy subject and help researchers assess Iranian EFL teachers&#039; critical cultural awareness.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>Intercultural communicative competence</kwd>
						<kwd>Critical cultural awareness</kwd>
						<kwd>questionnaire development</kwd>
						<kwd>EFL teachers</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Ahmadi Safa, M., Moradi, M., &amp; Hamzavi, R. (2015). Iranian EFL teachers and learners’ perspective on potentiality of Top Notch series for intercultural competence development. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(2), 47-66.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., &amp; Razavieh, A. (1990). Introduction to research in education (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Baleghizadeh, S., &amp; Jamali Motahed. M. (2010). An analysis of the ideological content of internationally-developed British and American ELT textbooks. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS) 2(2), 1-27.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 16(Series B), 296-298.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Brown, H. D., &amp; Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Pearson.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Byram, M. (1997) Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Byram, M. (2012). Language awareness and (critical) cultural awareness - relationships, comparisons, and contrasts. Language Awareness, 21(1-2), 5-13.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Fairclough, N. (2006). Response to Narsisa Paredes- Canilao. Journal of Multicultural Discourses. 1(1). 35-38.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Glaser, B. G., &amp; Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Guilherme, M. (2000). Intercultural Competence. In M. Byram (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (pp. 297-300). London:Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Guilherme, M. (2002) Critical citizens for an intercultural world: Foreign language education as cultural politics. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Halualani, R. T., &amp; Nakayama, T. K. (2010). Critical intercultural communication studies: At a crossroads. In T. K. Nakayama &amp; R. T. Halualani (Eds.), The handbook of intercultural communication (pp. 1-16). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Hashemi, M. R. &amp; Babaii, E. (2013). Mixed methods research: Toward new research designs in applied linguistics. The Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 828-852.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. Pride &amp; J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Jackson, J. (2006). Ethnographic preparation for short-term study and residence in the target culture. The International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(1), 77-98.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Jedynack, M. (2011). The attitude of English teachers towards developing intercultural communicative competence. In J. Arabski, &amp; A. Wojtaszek (Eds.), Aspects of culture in second language acquisition and foreign language learning (pp. 63-73). London, England: Springer.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Kramsch, C. (2004). The language teacher as go-between. Utbildning &amp; Demokrati, 13(3), 37-60.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Kreisberg, S. (1992). Transforming power. Albany: State University of New York Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: from method to post method. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Individual identity, cultural globalization and teaching English as an international language: The case for an epistemic break. In L. Alsagoff, S. McKay, G. Hu, &amp; W. Renandya (Eds.), Principles and practices for teaching English as an international language (pp. 9-27). New York: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Lincoln, Y. S. &amp; Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverley Hills: Sage.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Martin, J. N. &amp; Nakayama, T. K. (2000). Intercultural communication in contexts. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Martin, J. N., &amp; Nakayama, T. K. (2010). Intercultural communication and dialectics revisited. In T. K. Nakayama &amp; R. T. Halualani (Eds.), The handbook of intercultural communication (pp. 34-52). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>McKay, S. L. (2003). Teaching English as an international language: The Chilean context. ELT Journal, 57(2), 139-148.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>McKay, S. L. (2012). Principles of teaching English as an international language. In L. Alsagoff, S. McKay, G. Hu, &amp; W. Renandya (Eds.), Principles and practices for teaching English as an international language (pp. 28-46). New York: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Medina-López-Portillo, A. (2004). Intercultural learning assessment: The link between program duration and the development of intercultural sensitivity. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, X, 179-199.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Miike, Y. (2010). Culture as text and culture as theory: Asiacentricity and its Raison D’être in intercultural communication research. In T. K. Nakayama &amp; R. T. Halualani (Eds.), The handbook of intercultural communication (pp. 190-215). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Nugent, K. &amp; Catalano, T.(2015). Critical cultural awareness in the foreign language classroom. NECTFL   Review. 75, 15-30.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>Phillipson, R. (1992) Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>Phillipson, R. (2003). English only Europe? Challenging language policy. London: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Robinson-Stuart, G., &amp; Nocon, H. (1996). Second culture acquisition: Ethnography in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 80(4), 431-49.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>Ruble, T. L., &amp; Stout, D. E. (1991). Reliability, classification stability, and response-set bias of alternate forms of the Learning-Style Inventory (LSI-1985). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(2), 481-489.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation>Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>Salisbury, M. H. (2011). The effect of study abroad on intercultural competence among undergraduate college students (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa). Retrieved from  http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/1073</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Sercu, L., Bandura, E., Castro, P., Davcheva, L., Laskaridou, C., Lundgren, U., Carmen Mendez Garcia, M., &amp; Ryan, P. (2005). Foreign language teachers and intercultural competence: An international investigation. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Sharifian, F. (2009). English as an international language: Perspectives and pedagogical issues. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>Sinicrope, C., Norris, J., Watanabe, Y. (2007). Understanding and assessing intercultural competence: A summary of theory, research, and practice. Second Language Studies, 26(1), 1-58.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation>Sorrells, K. (2010). Re-imagining intercultural communication in the context of globalization. In T. K. Nakayama &amp; R. T. Halualani (Eds.), The handbook of intercultural communication (pp. 34-52). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.        </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Smith, L. E. (1976). English as an international auxiliary language. RELC Journal, 7(2), 38-42.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R49">
			<label>49</label>
			<element-citation>Tajeddin, Z., &amp; Teimournezhad, S. (2014). Exploring the hidden agenda in the representation of culture in international and localized ELT textbooks. The Language Learning Journal, 43(2), 1-14.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R50">
			<label>50</label>
			<element-citation>Usó-Juan, E., &amp; Martínez-Flor, A. (2006). Approaches to language learning and teaching: Towards acquiring communicative competence through the four skills. In E. Usó-Juan &amp; A. Martínez-Flor (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp. 3-26). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2017.24570.2204</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4179_0f54d90798ca693f0d902d979ff44edc.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>Impact of Direct Corrective Feedback (DCF) Through Electronic Portfolio (EP) Platform on the components of Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing across Levels of Language Proficiency</article-title>
			        <subtitle>Impact of direct corrective feedback (DCF) through Electronic Portfolio (EP) Platform on the components of Iranian EFL Learners’ writing across levels of language proficiency</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Esfandiari</surname>
			            <given-names>Rajab</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Assistant Professor of TEFL at Imam Khomeini International University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Meihami</surname>
			            <given-names>Hussein</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>PhD candidate in TEFL at Shiraz University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>07</month>
			        <year>2017</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>36</volume>
			      <issue>2</issue>
			      <fpage>39</fpage>
			      <lpage>74</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>18</day>
			          <month>02</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>06</day>
			          <month>09</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2017, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4179.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4179.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>While some researchers have questioned the efficacy of corrective feedback (CF), other researchers believe that CF can be effective if implemented through new technology types, including e-portfolio (EP). However, whether EP can be used as a medium of providing CF for language learners at different levels of language proficiency is still unknown. The purpose of the present study, therefore, was twofold: (a) to examine the writing performance of EFL learners across three levels of language proficiency receiving direct corrective feedback (DCF) via EP, and (b) to investigate which language proficiency group benefits more from DCF provided via EP. For the purposes of the present study, sixty (60) Iranian EFL learners who were divided into three levels of language proficiency at Sharif language center in Tehran, Iran participated in this study. The results of data analysis showed statistically significant differences for two components of writing—content, and mechanics—between beginning and intermediate, and beginning and advanced language learners. The results also showed that the higher the language proficiency level of language learners, the more they benefit from the provision of DCF through EP. These findings suggest that EP may be a viable option to supply Iranian EFL learners across levels of language proficiency with DCF. The article concludes with a call for testing the threshold-level hypothesis that may exist for language learners to use EP.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>direct corrective feedback</kwd>
						<kwd>e-portfolio</kwd>
						<kwd>proficiency level</kwd>
						<kwd>threshold level</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Ammar, A., &amp; Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 543–574.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Baturay, M. H., &amp; Daloglu, A. (2010). E-portfolio assessment in an online English language course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(4), 413-428.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Berlin, L. N. (2005). Contextualizing College ESL Classroom Praxis: A Participatory Approach to Effective Instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Bitchener, J., &amp; Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research Journal, 12(3), 409-341.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Bitchener, J. Young, S. &amp; Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(2), 191-205.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Blanton, L. L. (2008). Step-by-step writing book (1-3): A standards-based approach. HEINLE: Australia.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Brush, T., Glazewski, K. D., &amp; Hew, K. F. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure preservice teachers’ technology skills, technology beliefs, and technology barriers. Computers in the Schools, 25(1), 112-125.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Burstein, J., Chodorow, M., &amp; Leacock, C. (2004). Automated essay evaluation: The Criterion online writing service. AI Magazine, 25(3), 27–36.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Castro Sánchez, J. J., &amp; Alemán, E. C., (2011). Teachers’ opinion survey on the use of ICT tools to support attendance-based teaching. Journal Computers and Education, 56(3), 911-915.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., &amp; Tsai, C.C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology and Society, 13(1), 63-73.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Chapelle, C. (2009). The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computer-assisted language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 741-753.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Chau, J., &amp; Cheng, G. (2010). Towards understanding the potential of e-portfolios for independent learning: A qualitative study. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(7), 932-950.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>DOKEOS. (2014). Retrieved November 28, 2014 from www.dokeos.com.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Erice, D., &amp; Ertas, A. (2011). The impact of e-portfolio on foreign language writing skills. Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 44(2), 73-94.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Ferris, D.  R. (1999).  The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes.  A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1-10.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Ferris, D.  R. (2002).  Treatment of error in second language student writing.  Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Ferris, D.  R. (2004). Response to student writing:  Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Ferris, D.  R., Liu, H., &amp; Rabie, B.  (2011). The job of teaching writing:  Teacher views of responding to writing.  Writing and Pedagogy, 3(1), 39–77.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Ferris, D.  R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., &amp; Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 307-329.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Ferris, D. R. (1995). Teaching ESL composition students to become independent self-editors. TESOL Journal, 4(1), 18-22.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Ferris, D. R., Chaney, S. J., Komura, K., Roberts, B. J., &amp; McKee, S. (2000). Perspectives, Problems, &amp; practices in treating written error. Colloquium presented at International TESOL Convention, Vancouver, BC.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Ferris, D., Brown, J., Liu, H., Eugenia, M., &amp; Stine, A. (2011). Responding to L2 Students in College Writing Classes: Teacher Perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 45(2), 207-234.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Fiori, M. L. (2005). The development of grammatical competence through synchronous computer-mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 567-602.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Frantzen, D. (1995). The effects of grammar supplementation on written accuracy in an intermediate Spanish content course. Modern Language Journal, 79(3), 329-344.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Garrett, N. (1991). Technology in the service of language learning: Trends and issues. Modern Language Journal, 75(1), 74–101.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., &amp; Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Guénette, D. (2008). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), 40-53.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Guénette, D. (2012). The pedagogy of error correction: Surviving the written corrective feedback challenge. TESL Canada Journal, 30(1), 117-126.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Guénette, D., &amp; Lyster, R. (2013). Written corrective feedback and its challenges for pre-service ESL teachers. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(2), 129-153.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Hackmann, D. G., &amp; Alsbury, T.L. (2005). Standards-based leadership preparation program improvement through the use of portfolio assessments. Educational Considerations, 32(2), 36-45.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Hassaskhah, J., &amp; Sharifi, A. (2011).  The role of portfolio assessment and reflection on process writing. Asian EFL Journal, 13(1), 193-231.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Hegelheimer, V., &amp; Tower, D. (2004). Using call in the classroom: analyzing student interactions within an authentic call program. System, 32(2), 185-205.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Himpsl-Gutermann, K., &amp; Baumgartner, P. (2010). Evaluation of e-portfolio systems. In A. Buzzetto-More (Eds.), E-portfolio Paradigm: Informing, Educating, Assessing, and Managing with E-portfolios, (pp.19–33). Santa Clara: Informing Science Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>Jacobs, H., Zinkgraf, S., Wormuth, D., Hartfiel, V., &amp; Hughey, J.  (1981) Testing ESL   composition:  A practical approach. Rowley, MA:  Newbury House.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>Kahtani, S., A. (1999). Electronic portfolios in ESL writing: An alternative approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(3), 261-268.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>Kam, R., Tang, S. K., &amp; Lee, L. (2016). The impact of technology-supported and triangulated writing tasks on a pilot interdisciplinary undergraduate subject for construction disciplines. Computers and Composition, 40(2), 131-150.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Koc, M. (2005). Implications of learning theories for effective technology integration and preservice teacher training: A critical literature review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 2(1), 2-18.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>Kondo-Brown, K. (2002). A FACETS analysis of rater bias in measuring Japanese L2 writing performance. Language Testing, 19(1), 3–31.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation>Krashen, S. (1985). The Input hypothesis. London: Longman.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>Kupelian, M. (2001). The use of email in the L2 classroom: An overview. Second Language Learning &amp; Teaching, 1(1): Retrieved from http://www.usq.edu.au/opacs/cllt/sllt/1-1/ Kupelian01.htm.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Lavolette, E., Polio, C., &amp; Kahng, J. (2014). The accuracy of computer-assisted feedback and students' responses to it. Language Learning &amp; Technology, 19(2), 50–68.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Lee, E., Chan, C., &amp; van Aalst, J.  (2006). Students assessing their collaborative knowledge building. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 277–307.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>Lee, I.  (2008). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms.  Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 69–85.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation>Lee, J., &amp; Schallert, D., L. (1997). The relative contribution of L2 language proficiency and L1 reading ability to L2 reading performance: A test of the threshold hypothesis in an EFL context. TESOL Quarterly, 31(4), 713-739.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Levin, T. &amp; Wadmany, R. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-based classrooms: A developmental view. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 417-441.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R49">
			<label>49</label>
			<element-citation>Li, S. (2014). The interface between feedback type, L2 proficiency, and the nature of the linguistic target. Language Teaching Research, 18(3), 373-396.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R50">
			<label>50</label>
			<element-citation>Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie &amp; T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R51">
			<label>51</label>
			<element-citation>Lorenzo, G., &amp; Ittelson, J. (2005). An Overview of e-Portfolios. Retrieved January 18, 2016, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3001.pdf</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R52">
			<label>52</label>
			<element-citation>Loucky, J. P. (2002). Assessing the potential of computerized bilingual dictionaries for enhancing English vocabulary learning. P. N. D., Lewis (Eds.). The changing face of CALL (pp. 123-137). CRC Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R53">
			<label>53</label>
			<element-citation>Mackey, A., &amp; Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338–356.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R54">
			<label>54</label>
			<element-citation>McMahon, G. (2009). Critical thinking and ICT integration in a Western Australian secondary school. Educational Technology and Society, 12(2), 269-281.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R55">
			<label>55</label>
			<element-citation>Montgomery, J.  L., &amp; Baker, W.  (2007). Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), 82-99.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R56">
			<label>56</label>
			<element-citation>Nassaji, H. (2007). The development of spelling and orthographic knowledge in English as an L2: A longitudinal case study. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 77-98.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R57">
			<label>57</label>
			<element-citation>Peters, M., Chevrier, J., LeBlanc, R., Fortin, G., &amp; Malette, J. (2006). The e-portfolio: A learning tool for Pre-Service Teachers. In A. Jafari &amp; C. Kaufman (eds.), Handbook of research on e-portfolios (pp. 313- 326). Hershey: Idea Group Reference.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R58">
			<label>58</label>
			<element-citation>Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at gender and strategy use in L2 reading. Language Learning, 53(4), 649-702.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R59">
			<label>59</label>
			<element-citation>Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44(4), 493-527.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R60">
			<label>60</label>
			<element-citation>Pienemann, M. (1985). Learnability and syllabus construction. In K. Hyltenstam &amp; M. Pienemann (eds.), Modelling and Assessing Second Language Development (pp. 23-75). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R61">
			<label>61</label>
			<element-citation>Read, J., &amp; Kroll, Designing and assessing effective classroom writing assignments for NES and ESL students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(1), 17-41.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R62">
			<label>62</label>
			<element-citation>Richards, J. C. &amp; Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. (3rd ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R63">
			<label>63</label>
			<element-citation>Robb, T., Ross, S., &amp; Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1): 83-93.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R64">
			<label>64</label>
			<element-citation>Saeedi, Z., &amp; Meihami, H. (2015).  E-portfolio as a corrective platform towards EFL students' overall/componential writing performance. Teaching English with technology, 15(4), 76-97.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R65">
			<label>65</label>
			<element-citation>Saeedi, Z., Meihami, H., &amp; Husseini, F. (2014). E-Mail Platform and Its Effects on Providing Corrective Feedback to EFL Students. English Language Teaching (ELT), 1(2), 41-65.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R66">
			<label>66</label>
			<element-citation>Salaberry, R. M. (2000). L2 morphosyntactic development in text-based computer-mediated communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(1), 5-27.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R67">
			<label>67</label>
			<element-citation>Shehadeh, A., (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 286-305.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R68">
			<label>68</label>
			<element-citation>Shepherd, G. E., &amp; Bolliger, D. U. (2011). The effects of electronic portfolio tools on online students’ perceived support and cognitive load. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 142-149.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R69">
			<label>69</label>
			<element-citation>Shintani, N. (2015). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: a case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8(3), 279-294.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R70">
			<label>70</label>
			<element-citation>Shintani, N. (2016). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 517-538.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R71">
			<label>71</label>
			<element-citation>Shiotsu, T. &amp; Weir C. J. (2007). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary breadth in the prediction of reading comprehension test performance. Language Testing, 24(1), 99-128.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R72">
			<label>72</label>
			<element-citation>Smith, B. (2003) Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 38-57.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R73">
			<label>73</label>
			<element-citation>Sotillo, S. M. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning &amp; Technology, 4(1), 82-119.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R74">
			<label>74</label>
			<element-citation>Stevenson, M., &amp; Phakiti, A. (2014). The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Assessing Writing, 19(1), 51-65.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R75">
			<label>75</label>
			<element-citation>Stockwell, G.  (2007).  Vocabulary on the move:  Investigating an  intelligent  mobile  phone-based  vocabulary tutor.  Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(4): 365-383.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R76">
			<label>76</label>
			<element-citation>Tabachnick, B. G., &amp; Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R77">
			<label>77</label>
			<element-citation>Tahriri, A., Hassaskhah, J., Mozafarian Pour, A. (2015). The impact of synchronous computer-mediated communication on EFL learners’ motivation.   International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 4(2), 3-17. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R78">
			<label>78</label>
			<element-citation>Thang, M., S. Lee, S., Y., &amp; Zulkifli, F., N. (2012). The role of the electronic portfolio in enhancing Information and Communication Technology and English language skills: the voices of six Malaysian undergraduates. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(3), 277-293.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R79">
			<label>79</label>
			<element-citation>Truscott, J.  (1996).  The case  against grammar  correction in  L2  writing classes.  Language Learning, 46(2), 327-369.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R80">
			<label>80</label>
			<element-citation>Truscott, J.  (1999). The case for “the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 111-122.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R81">
			<label>81</label>
			<element-citation>Truscott, J.  (2007). The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately.  Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255-272.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R82">
			<label>82</label>
			<element-citation>Truscott, J. (2004) Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 337-343.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R83">
			<label>83</label>
			<element-citation>Van Beuningen, C., De Jong, N., &amp; Kuiken, F. (2008). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners’ written accuracy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, 279-296.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R84">
			<label>84</label>
			<element-citation>VanKooten, C., &amp; Berkley, B. (2016). Messy problem-exploring through video in first-year writing: Assessing what counts. Computers and Composition, 40(2), 151-163.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R85">
			<label>85</label>
			<element-citation>Weigle, S. C. (2002) Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R86">
			<label>86</label>
			<element-citation>Xu, Q., &amp; Peng, H. (2017). Investigating mobile-assisted oral feedback in teaching Chinese as a second language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3-4), 173-182.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2017.25896.2291</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4238_36fe4c281db5a09cd7e7ebe62f6812b1.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>Interactional complexity development, interactional demonstrators and interaction density in collaborative and e-collaborative writing modalities</article-title>
			        <subtitle>Interactional complexity development, interactional demonstrators and interaction density in collaborative and e-collaborative writing modalities</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Mohammadi</surname>
			            <given-names>Zohre</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>English Translation Department, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>07</month>
			        <year>2017</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>36</volume>
			      <issue>2</issue>
			      <fpage>75</fpage>
			      <lpage>102</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>28</day>
			          <month>06</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>29</day>
			          <month>10</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2017, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4238.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4238.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>This study aimed at investigating the potential of collaborative and e-collaborative writing modalities in developing interactional complexity, utilization of interactional demonstrators and density of interaction. To this end, 66 Iranian intermediate female English as foreign language learners (EFL) were selected to participate in this study according to their scores on Oxford Placement Test (OPT). Participant assignment into experimental group was done on the basis of computer literacy criterion. The conversation analysis of transcribed conversations in collaborative writing and log analysis of e-collaborative writing on e-writing forum indicated that collaborative writing led to more complex interaction than e-collaborative writing on the basis of interaction complexity measure. Significant differences were found in the frequency of interactional resources and demonstrators in two writing modalities using chi-square analysis. Informational demonstrators occurred more in e-collaborative writing, and interactional, attitude and empathic resources occurred more in collaborative writing. Interaction density measure was also in favor of collaborative writing. The results implied that implementation of collaborative tasks is potential technique for the development and assessment of interactional competence.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>Interactional complexity</kwd>
						<kwd>interactional resources</kwd>
						<kwd>interactional density</kwd>
						<kwd>collaborative writing</kwd>
						<kwd>e-collaborative writing</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Alwi, N. A. N. M., Adams, R., &amp; Newton, J. (2012). Writing to learn via text chat: Task implementation and focus on form. Journal of second language writing, 21(1), 23-39.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Arundale, R. B. (2013). Conceptualizing ‘interaction in interpersonal pragmatics: Implications for understanding and research. Journal of pragmatics, 58, 12-26.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Azadi, S. (2015). The role of classroom interaction on the improvement of speaking among Iranian learners. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 8(1), 126-135.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Bottema-Beutel, K., &amp; Smith, N. (2013). The interactional construction of identity: An adolescent with autism in interaction with peers. Linguistics and Education, 24(2), 197-214.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Chalak, A., &amp; Karimi, M. (2017). Analysis of turn-taking and repair strategies among male and female Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(2), 1-9.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Choi, J. W.-C. (2008). The role of online collaboration in promoting ESL writing. English Language Teaching, 1(1), 34-49.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Collentine, J., &amp; Freed, B. F. (2004). Learning context and its effects on second language acquisition: Introduction. Studies in second Language acquisition, 26(2), 153-171.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Crookes, G. (1990). The utterance, and other basic units for second language discourse analysis. Applied linguistics, 11(2), 183-199.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Deci, E. L., &amp; Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. The psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of second language writing, 21(1), 40-58.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R., &amp; Barkhuizen, G. P. (2005). Analysing learner language: Oxford University Press, USA.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., &amp; Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language learning, 44(3), 449-491.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Elola, I., &amp; Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning &amp; Technology, 14(3), 51-71.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Elola, I., &amp; Oskoz, A. (2017). Writing with 21st-century social tools in the L2 classroom: New literacies, genres, and writing practices. Journal of Second Language Writing.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Frear, M. W., &amp; Bitchener, J. (2015). The effects of cognitive task complexity on writing complexity. Journal of second language writing, 30, 45-57.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Fulcher, G. (2003). Testing second language speaking: Pearson Education.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Ghaith, G. (2003). Effects of the learning together model of cooperative learning in English as a foreign language reading achievement, academic self-esteem, and feelings of school alienation. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(3), 451-474.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Goldberg, A., Russell, M., &amp; Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1), Available from http://www.jtla.org.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Hall, J. K., &amp; Smotrova, T. (2013). Teacher self-talk: an Interactional resource for managing instruction and eliciting empathy. Journal of pragmatics, 47(1), 75-92.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Hayes, T., &amp; Ge, X. (2008). The effects of computer-supported collaborative learning on students' writing performance. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences-Volume 1.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Hulstijn, J. H. (2011). Language proficiency in native and nonnative speakers: An agenda for research and suggestions for second-language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(3), 229-249.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Jalili, M. H., &amp; Shahrokhi, M. (2017). Impact of Collaborative Writing on the Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency of Iranian EFL Learners’ L2 Writing. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(4), 13-28.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Kent, C., Laslo, E., &amp; Rafaeli, S. (2016). Interactivity in online discussions and learning outcomes. Computers &amp; Education, 97, 116-128.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Kim, Y. (2009). The effects of task complexity on learner-learner interaction. System, 37(2), 254-268.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Kitajima, R. (2013). Interactional features of repair negotiation in NS–NNS interaction on two task types: Information gap and personal information exchange. Linguistics and Education, 24(2), 165-178.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Lee, J. J., &amp; Deakin, L. (2016). Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays. Journal of second language writing, 33, 21-34.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., &amp; Muukkonen, H. (1999). Computer supported collaborative learning: A review. The JHGI Giesbers reports on education, 10, 1999.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Li, M., &amp; Kim, D. (2016). One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of second language writing, 31, 25-42.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Lindgren, E., &amp; Stevenson, M. (2013). Interactional resources in the letters of young writers in Swedish and English. Journal of second language writing, 22(4), 390-405.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Lucas, E. M., Oliveira, T. C., Farias, K., &amp; Alencar, P. S. (2017). CollabRDL: A language to coordinate collaborative reuse. Journal of Systems and Software. 131, 505-527.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Luna, A. M. R., &amp; Ortiz, L. S. H. (2013). Collaborative writing to enhance academic writing development through project work. HOW Journal, 20(1), 130-148.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>McDonough, K., &amp; Fuentes, C. s. G. a. (2015). The effect of writing task and task conditions on Colombian EFL learners’ language use. TESL Canada Journal, 32(2), 67.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Mohamadi, Z. (2017). Task engagement: a potential criterion for quality assessment of language learning tasks. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2(1), 3.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Morales, M. C., &amp; Lee, J. S. (2015). Stories of assessment: Spanish–English bilingual children's agency and interactional competence in oral language assessments. Linguistics and Education, 29, 32-45.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Palonen, T., Hakkarainen, K., &amp; Fishman, B. (2013). Patterns of interaction in computer-supported learning: A social network analysis. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>Pardo-Ballester, C., &amp; Cabello, A. C. (2016). L2 collaborative E-writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 601-607.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>Pinnow, R. J., &amp; Chval, K. B. (2015). “How much You wanna bet?”: Examining the role of positioning in the development of L2 learner interactional competencies in the content classroom. Linguistics and Education, 30, 1-11.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>Platt, E., &amp; Brooks, F. B. (2002). Task engagement: A turning point in foreign language development. Language learning, 52(2), 365-400.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Pollitt, A. (2009). The oxford online placement test: The meaning of OPT scores: London: Oxford University Press. Available for download at: http//oxfordenglishtesting. com.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>Prohorets, E., &amp; Plekhanova, M. (2015). Interaction intensity levels in a blended learning environment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3818-3823.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation>Rabiee, A., Nazarian, Z., &amp; Gharibshaeyan, R. (2013). An explanation for internet use obstacles concerning e-learning in Iran. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 361-376.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>Rahimpour, M., &amp; Mohamadi, Z. (2012). Incidental and intentional instruction on discussion techniques: Assessing complexity issue. ISRN Education, Article ID 853460.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2011). Developmental changes in the use of interactional resources: Persuading the reader in FL book reviews. Journal of second language writing, 20(4), 243-256.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Samarbakhsh Tehrani, S., Iravani, H., Hessamy, G., &amp; Hemmati, F. (2013). The effects of teachers' interactional moves on learners' uptake in EFL classrooms. Journal of Language and Translation, 3(3), 81-92.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>Sato, M. (2014). Exploring the construct of interactional oral fluency: Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing approaches. System, 45, 79-91.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation>Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of educational research, 50(2), 241-271.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Shively, R. L. (2015). Developing interactional competence during study abroad: Listener responses in L2 Spanish. System, 48, 86-98.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R49">
			<label>49</label>
			<element-citation>Turner, C. (2012). Classroom assessment. Routledge handbook of language testing, 61-74.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R50">
			<label>50</label>
			<element-citation>Twiner, A., Littleton, K., Coffin, C., &amp; Whitelock, D. (2014). Meaning making as an interactional accomplishment: A temporal analysis of intentionality and improvisation in classroom dialogue. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 94-106.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R51">
			<label>51</label>
			<element-citation>Urdan, T., &amp; Schoenfelder, E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of school psychology, 44(5), 331-349.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R52">
			<label>52</label>
			<element-citation>Yazdi-Amirkhiz, S. Y., Ajideh, P., &amp; Leitner, G. (2016). The influence of collaboration on individual writing quality: the case of Iranian vs. Malaysian college students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning,17(8), 1-24</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R53">
			<label>53</label>
			<element-citation>Young, R., &amp; He, A. W. (1998). Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency (Vol. 14): John Benjamins Publishing.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R54">
			<label>54</label>
			<element-citation>Zhang, S., Liu, Q., Chen, W., Wang, Q., &amp; Huang, Z. (2017). Interactive networks and social knowledge construction behavioral patterns in primary school teachers' online collaborative learning activities. Computers &amp; Education, 104, 1-17.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R55">
			<label>55</label>
			<element-citation>Zheng, B., &amp; Warschauer, M. (2017). Epilogue: Second language writing in the age of computer-mediated communication. Journal of Second Language Writing.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2017.23918.2154</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4127_dd7d9db6d0aad85bc69feee18fb2b9c7.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>Investigating the Impact of Response Format on the Performance of Grammar Tests: Selected and Constructed</article-title>
			        <subtitle>Investigating the Impact of Response Format on the Performance of Grammar Tests: Selected and Constructed</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Mozaffari</surname>
			            <given-names>Farzaneh</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>University of Tehran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Alavi</surname>
			            <given-names>S. Mohammad</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>University of Tehran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c3">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Rezaee</surname>
			            <given-names>Abbasali</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>University of Tehran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>07</month>
			        <year>2017</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>36</volume>
			      <issue>2</issue>
			      <fpage>103</fpage>
			      <lpage>128</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>27</day>
			          <month>12</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>18</day>
			          <month>07</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2017, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4127.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4127.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>When constructing a test, an initial decision is choosing an appropriate item response format which can be classified as selected or constructed. In large-scale tests where time and finance are of concern, the use of response chosen known as multiple-choice items is quite widespread. This study aimed at investigating the impact of response format on the performance of structure tests. Concurrent common item equating design was used to compare multiple-choice items with their constructed response stem-equivalent in a test of grammar. The Rasch model was employed to compare item difficulties, fit statistics, ability estimates and reliabilities of the two tests. Two independent sample t-tests were also conducted to investigate whether the differences among the item difficulty estimates and ability estimates of the two tests were statistically significant.  A statistically significant difference was observed in item difficulties. However, no significant difference was detected between the ability estimates, fit statistics, and reliabilities of the two tests.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>Response format</kwd>
						<kwd>multiple-choice item</kwd>
						<kwd>Constructed -response item</kwd>
						<kwd>Rasch model</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Ackerman, T.A., &amp; Smith, P. L. (1988). A comparison of the information provided by essay, multiple-choice, and free-response writing tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(2), 117- 128.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Bacon, D. R. (2003). Assessing learning outcomes: A comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions in a marketing context. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(1), 31-36.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Bachman, L. (1990). A fundamental consideration in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Baghai, P. (2010). Test score was equating and fairness in language assessment. Journal of English Language Studies, 1(3), 113-128.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Bensoussan, M. (1984). A comparison of cloze and multiple- choice reading comprehension tests of English as a Foreign Language. Language Testing, 1(1), 101-104.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Bleske-Rechek, A.  Zeug, N., &amp; Webb, R. M. (2007). Discrepant performance on multiple-choice and short answer assessments and the relation of performance to general scholastic aptitude. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 89-105.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Bond, T. G. &amp; Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Bridgeman, B. (1992). A comparison of quantitative questions in open-ended and multiple-choice formats. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29(3), 253-271.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Cheng, H. F. (2004). A Comparison of multiple-choice and open-ended formats for the assessment of listening proficiency in English. Foreign Language Annals, 37(4), 544–555.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Currie, M.,&amp;Chiramanee, T. (2010).The effect of the multiple-choice item format on the measurement of knowledge of language structure.Language Testing, 27(4), 471–491.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Dávid, G. (2007). Investigating the performance of alternative types of grammar items. Language Testing, 24(1), 65–97.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Dudley, A. (2006). Multiple dichotomous-scored items in second language testing: Investigating the multiple true-false item types under norm-referenced conditions. Language Testing, 23(2) 198-228.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Ebel, R. L., &amp; Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement (5thed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Elinor, S. H. (1997, May). Reading native and foreign language texts and tests: The case of Arabic and Hebrew native speakers reading L1 and English FL texts and tests. Paper presented at the Language Testing Symposium, Ramat-Gan, Israel. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED412746)</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Farr, R., Pritchard, R., &amp; Smitten, B. (1990). A description of what happens when an examinee takes a multiple-choice reading comprehension test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 209–226. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Frederickson, N. (1984). The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning. American psychologist, 39, 193-202.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Frisbie, D.A., &amp; Druva, C.A. (1986).Estimating the reliability of multiple true-false tests. Journal of Educational Measurement 23, 99–105.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Gibbs, W. J. (1995). An approach to designing computer-based evaluation of student constructed responses: Effects on achievement and instructional time. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 6(2), 99-119.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Godschalk, F. I., Swineford, F., &amp; Coffman, W. E. (1966). The measurement of writing ability. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Haladyna, T.M., Downing, S. M., &amp; Rodriguez, M. C. (2002). A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied Measurement in Education 15, 309–34.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Hambleton, R. K. &amp; Jones, R. W.  (1993). Comparison of classical test theory</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>and item response theory and their applications to test development. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12 (3), 38-47.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>In’nami, Y. (2006). The effects of task types on listening test performance: A quantitative and qualitative study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tsukuba, Japan.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>In'nami, Y.,&amp; Koizumi, R. (2009). A meta-analysis of test format effects on reading and listening test performance: Focus on multiple-choice and open-ended formats. Language Testing, 26 (2), 219–244.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Katz, L., Bennett, R.E. &amp; Berger, A.E. (2000). Effects of response format on the difficulty of SAT-Mathematics items: It's not the strategy. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37(l), 39-57.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Kobayashi, M. (2002). Method effects on reading comprehension test performance: Text organization and response format. Language Testing, 19, 193–220.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Linacre, J.M. (2016). A User's Guide to WINSTEPS®. Retrieved July 7, 2016, from  http://www.winsteps.com/</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Lord, F. M. (1953). The relation of test score to the trait underlying the test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 13, 517-548.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Lukhele, R., Thissen, D., &amp; Wainer, H. (1994). On the relative value of multiple-choice, constructed-response, and examinee-selected items on two achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31, 234–250.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Messick, S. (1993). Trait equivalence as construct validity of score interpretation across multiple methods of measurement. In R. E. Bennett &amp; W. C.  Ward (Eds.), Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement: Issues in constructed response, performance testing, and portfolio assessment (pp. 61-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Morgenstem, C. F.  &amp; Renner, J. W.  (1984). Measuring thinking with standardized tests. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 639-648.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Quellmalz, E. S., Capell, F.J.&amp; Chou, C.P. (1982). Effects of discourse and response mode on the measurement of writing competence. Journal of Educational Measurement, 19(4), 241-258.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Rodriguez, M. C. (2003). Construct equivalence of multiple-choice and constructed-response items: A random-effects synthesis of correlations. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 163–184.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Rogers, W., &amp; Harley, D. (1999). An empirical comparison of three-and four-choice items and tests: Susceptibility to test-wiseness and internal consistency reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59 (2), 234.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Shizuka, T., Takeuchi, O., Yashima, T., &amp;Yoshizawa, K. (2006). A comparison of three- and four-option English tests for university entrance selection purposes in Japan. Language Testing, 23, 35-57.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Shohamy, E. (1984). Does the testing method make a difference? The case of reading comprehension. Language Testing, 1, 147- 170.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>Smith, E. V. Jr. (2001). Evidence for the reliability of measures and validity of measure interpretation: A Rasch measurement perspective. Journal of Applied Measurement, 2(3), 281-311.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>Teng, H. C. (1999). The effects of question type and preview on EFL listening assessment. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 432920)</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>Thissen, D., &amp; Steinberg, L. (1984). A response model for multiple choice items.  Psychometrika, 49, 501-519.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Tversky, A. (1964). On the optimal number of alternatives at a choice point. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 386–391.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>Trujillo, J. L., (2005). The effect of format and language on the observed scores of secondary-English speakers" (2005). Electronic Theses, Treatises, and Dissertations.  Retrieved form http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/etd/1509</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation>Traub, R. E. (1993). On the equivalence of the traits assessed by multiple-choice and constructed response tests. In R. E. Bennett &amp; W. C. Ward (Eds.), Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement: Issues in constructed-response, performance testing, and portfolio assessment (pp. 29-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>Van den Bergh, H. (1990). On the construct validity of multiple-choice items for reading comprehension. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14(1), 1-12.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Ventouras, E., Triantis, D., Tsiakas, P., &amp; Stergiopoulos, C. (2010). Comparison of examination methods based on multiple-choice questions and constructed-response questions using personal computers. Computers &amp; Education, 54(2)455-461.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Ward, W.C., Dupree, D., &amp; Carlson, S.B. (1987). A comparison of free-response and multiple-choice questions in the assessment of reading comprehension (ETS Research Rep. No. 87-20). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>Werts, C.E., Breland, H.M. Grandy, J., &amp; Rock, D.A. (1980). Using longitudinal data to estimate reliability in the presence of correlated errors of measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40 (l), 19 -29.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation>Wilson, M. (2005).Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Wolf, D. F. (1993). A comparison of assessment tasks used to measure FL reading comprehension.  The Modern Language Journal, 77, 473-489.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2017.24688.2215</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4335_d11b063d293b9b4b8d41cb728e086587.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>The Development of Reading and Operation Span Tasks in Persian as Measures of Working Memory Capacity for Iranian EFL Learners</article-title>
			        <subtitle>The Development of Reading and Operation Span Tasks in Persian as Measures of Working Memory Capacity for Iranian EFL Learners</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Najjari</surname>
			            <given-names>Rahim</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Urmia University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Mohammadi</surname>
			            <given-names>Mohammad</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Urmia University- Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>07</month>
			        <year>2017</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>36</volume>
			      <issue>2</issue>
			      <fpage>129</fpage>
			      <lpage>162</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>01</day>
			          <month>03</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>14</day>
			          <month>11</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2017, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4335.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4335.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>This paper presented two complex span tasks in Persian as measures of working memory capacity (WMC). Firstly, the construct of working memory (WM) and possible WM measures that could assess this construct efficiently were critically reviewed. Accordingly, as measures of domain-general components of WM, a reading span task and an operation span task which were documented to assess this construct efficiently were chosen and developed. Following this, the developed tasks were conducted on 151 teenage learners in a foreign language institute in West Azerbaijan Province. Then, the administration and scoring of the measures were described step by step. The tasks were validated against each other as well as against a digit span task which assessed the domain-specific aspect of WMC as well. The result showed a strong correlation between the reading span task and the operation span task, and a moderate correlation of either of the functions with the digit span task. Consequently, both of the developed span tasks can be valid indicators of WM capacity for Iranian individuals and can be used in a wide array of research domains in second language acquisition studies.  </p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>working memory</kwd>
						<kwd>reading span task</kwd>
						<kwd>operation span task</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Ardila, A. (2003). Language representation and working memory with bilinguals. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 233-240.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1-29.   </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Baddeley, A.D., &amp; Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning &amp; motivation (pp. 47-90). New York: Academic Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Barrouillet, P., &amp; Fayol, M. (1998). From algorithmic computing to direct retrieval: Evidence from number and alphabetic arithmetic in children and adults. Memory &amp; Cognition, 26 (2), 355-368.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Carruthers, P. (2013). Evolution of working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 11 (Supplement 2), pp. 10371-10378.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Case, R., Kurland, D. M., &amp; Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33(3), 386-404.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Colom, R., Rebollo, I., Abad, F. J., &amp; Shih, P. C. (2006). Complex span tasks, simple span tasks, and cognitive abilities: A reanalysis of key studies. Memory &amp; Cognition, 34 (1), 158-171.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Colom, R., Shih, P. C., Flores-Mendoza, C., &amp; Quiroga, M. A. (2006). The real relationship between short-term memory and working memory. Memory, 14, 804-813.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., &amp; Minkoff, S. R. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163-183.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Conway, A.R.A., &amp; Engle, R.W. (1996). Individual differences in WM capacity: More evidence for a general capacity theory. Memory, 4, 577-590.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D., Wilhelm, O. &amp; Engle, R. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review, 12 (5), 769-786.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. The Behavioral &amp; Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87‑114.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Cowan, N. (2013). Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 197-223.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Cowan, N. (2015). Second language use, theories of working memory and the Venetian mind. In Z. E. Wen, M. B. Mota, &amp; A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp.29-40). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Crowe, S. F. (2000). Does the letter-number sequencing task measure anything more than digit span? Assessment, 7(2), 113-117.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Danahy, K., Windsor, J., &amp; Kohnert, K. (2007). Counting span and the identification of primary language impairment. International Journal of Language &amp; Communication Disorders, 42(3), 349-365.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Daneman, M., &amp; Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning &amp; Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Dehaene, S. (2002). Verbal and nonverbal representations of numbers in the human brain. In M. Galaburda, S. M. Kosslyn, &amp; Y. Christen (eds), The Languages of the brain (pp. 179-190), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Dollaghan, C., &amp; Campbell, T. F. (1998). Nonword repetition and child language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, &amp; Hearing Research, 41, 1136-1146.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Dufva, M., &amp; Vauras, M. (2002). Promoting at-risk pupils’ foreign language literacy learning. Precursors of Functional Literacy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 317-337.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Dunn, G., Gaudia, L., Lowenherz, J., &amp; Barnes, M. (1990). Effects of reversing digits forward and digits backward and strategy use on digit span performance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8(1), 22-33.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., &amp; Carullo, J. J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &amp; Cognition, 18, 972-992</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., &amp; Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake, &amp; P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory (pp. 102-134). New York: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Friedman, N. P., &amp; Miyake, A. (2004). The reading span test and its predictive power for reading comprehension ability. Journal of Memory &amp; Language, 51(1), 136-158</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Friedman, N.P., &amp; Miyake, A. (2005). Comparison of four scoring methods for the reading span test. Behavior Research Methods, 37(4), 581-590.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Gass, S., &amp; Lee, J. (2011) Working memory capacity, inhibitory control, and proficiency in a second language. In M. Schmid. &amp; W. Lowie (Eds.), From structure to chaos: Twenty years of modeling bilingualism: In honor of Kees de Bot (pp. 59–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Gathercole, S. E., &amp; Alloway, T. P. (2008). Working memory and classroom learning. In K. Thurman, &amp; K. Fiorello (Eds.), Cognitive development in K-3 classroom learning: Research applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Harrington, M. (1992). Working memory capacity as a constraint on L2 development. In R. J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 123-135). Amsterdam: North Holland.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Hilbert, S., Nakagawa, T. T., Puci, P., Zech, A., &amp; Bühner, M. (2014). The digit span backward task. Verbal and visual cognitive strategies in working memory assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Hitch, G. J., &amp; McAuley, E. (1991). Working memory in children with specific arithmetical learning difficulties. British Journal of Psychology, 82(3), 375-386.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Perrig, W. J., &amp; Meier, B. (2010). The concurrent validity of the n-back task as a working memory measure. Memory, 18, 394-412.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Jones, G., &amp; Macken, B. (2015). Questioning short-term memory and its measurement: Why digit span measures long-term associative learning. Cognition, 144, 1-13.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Juffs, A., &amp; Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44(2), 137-166.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R., Miura, T. K., &amp; Colflesh, G. J. (2007). Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &amp; Cognition, 33(3), 615-622.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., &amp; Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189-217.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Lépine, R., Bernardin, S., &amp; Barrouillet, P. (2005). Attention switching and working memory spans. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 329-345.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T. &amp; Bunting, M.F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review, 21(4), 861-883.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>McLaughlin, B. (1995). Aptitude from an information processing perspective. Language Testing, 11, 364−381.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>Mitchell, A. E., Jarvis, S., O’Malley, M. &amp; Konstantinova, I. (2015). Working memory measures and L2 proficiency. In Z. E. Wen, M. B. Mota, &amp; A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 270-284). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Miyake, A., &amp; Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8-14.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>Montgomery, J. W. (2002). Understanding the language difficulties of children with specific language impairments: Does verbal working memory matter? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11(1), 77-91.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation>Norman, D., &amp; Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R.J. Davidson, G.E. Schwarts, &amp; D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4; pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>Oberauer, K., &amp; Süß, H. M. (2000). Working memory and interference: A comment on Jenkins, Myerson, Hale, and Fry (1999). Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review, 7, 727-733.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Phye, G. D., &amp; Pickering, S. J. (2006). Working memory and education. Academic Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Redick, T. S., Broadway, J. M., Meier, M. E., Kuriakose, P. S., Unsworth, N., Kane, M. J., &amp; Engle, R. W. (2012). Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(3), 164-171</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>Redick, T. S., &amp; Lindsey, D. R. (2013). Complex span and n-back measures of working memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review, 20(6), 1102-1113.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation> Roodenrys, S., &amp; Hinton, M. (2002). Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory &amp; Cognition, 28, 29-33.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Sagarra, N. (2017). Longitudinal effects of working memory on L2 grammar and reading abilities. Second Language Research, 1-23.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R49">
			<label>49</label>
			<element-citation>Salthouse, T. A., &amp; Babcock, R.L. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 763-776.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R50">
			<label>50</label>
			<element-citation>Sanz, C., Lin, H. J., Lado, B., Stafford, C. A., &amp; Bowden, H. W. (2014). One size fits all? Learning conditions and working memory capacity in Ab initio language development. Applied Linguistics, 37, 1-26.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R51">
			<label>51</label>
			<element-citation>Sasisekaran, J., Smith, A., Sadagopan, N., &amp; Weber‐Fox, C. (2010). Nonword repetition in children and adults: Effects on movement coordination. Developmental Science, 13(3), 521-532.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R52">
			<label>52</label>
			<element-citation>Schmiedek, F., Hildebrandt, A., Lövdén, M., Wilhelm, O., &amp; Lindenberger, U. (2009). Complex span versus updating tasks of working memory: The gap is not that deep. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &amp; Cognition, 35, 1089-1096.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R53">
			<label>53</label>
			<element-citation>Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., &amp; Lindenberger, U. (2014). A task is a task is a task: putting complex span, n-back, and other working memory indicators in psychometric context. Frontiers in psychology, 5,1475.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R54">
			<label>54</label>
			<element-citation>Shahnazari, M. (2013). The development of a Persian reading span test for the measure of L1 Persian EFL learners’ working memory capacity. Applied Research on the English Language, 2(2), 107-116.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R55">
			<label>55</label>
			<element-citation>Skehan, P. (2015). Working memory and second language performance: A commentary. In Z. E. Wen, M. B. Mota, &amp; A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 189-204). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R56">
			<label>56</label>
			<element-citation>St Clair-Thompson, H. L. (2007). The influence of strategies on relationships between working memory and cognitive skills. Memory, 15(4), 353-365.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R57">
			<label>57</label>
			<element-citation>Tagarelli, K. M., Mota, M. B. &amp; Rebuscha, P. (2015). Working memory, learning conditions and the acquisition of L2 syntax. In Z. E. Wen, M. B. Mota, &amp; A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp.224-247). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R58">
			<label>58</label>
			<element-citation>Tehan, G., Hendry, L., &amp; Kocinski, D. (2001). Word length and phonological similarity effects in simple, complex, and delayed serial recall tasks: Implications for working memory. Memory, 9, 333-348.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R59">
			<label>59</label>
			<element-citation>Thorn, A. S., &amp; Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Language-specific knowledge and short-term memory in bilingual and non-bilingual children. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 52(2), 303-324</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R60">
			<label>60</label>
			<element-citation>Turner, M. L., &amp; Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory &amp; Language, 28, 127-154.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R61">
			<label>61</label>
			<element-citation>Unsworth, N. (2010). On the division of working memory and long-term memory and their relation to intelligence: A latent variable approach. Acta Psychologica, 134, 16-28.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R62">
			<label>62</label>
			<element-citation>Unsworth, N., &amp; Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 104-132.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R63">
			<label>63</label>
			<element-citation>Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., &amp; Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498-505.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R64">
			<label>64</label>
			<element-citation>Van den Noort, M., Bosch, P., Haverkort, M., &amp; Hugdahl, K. (2008). A standard computerized version of the reading span test in different languages. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24(1), 35-42.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R65">
			<label>65</label>
			<element-citation>Waters, G. S., &amp; Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Experimental Psychology, 49 (1), 51–79.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R66">
			<label>66</label>
			<element-citation>Waters, G. S., &amp; Caplan, D. (2003). The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments &amp; Computers, 35, 550-564.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R67">
			<label>67</label>
			<element-citation>Wen, Z. E. (2014). Theorizing and measuring working memory in first and second language research. Language Teaching, 47(2), 173-190.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R68">
			<label>68</label>
			<element-citation>Wen, Z. E. (2015). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: The phonological/executive model. In Z. E. Wen, M. B. Mota, &amp; A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 41-62). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R69">
			<label>69</label>
			<element-citation>Wen, Z. E., Mota, M. B., &amp; McNeill, A. (Eds.). (2015). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R70">
			<label>70</label>
			<element-citation>Wright, C. (2015). Working memory and L2 development across the lifespan: A commentary. In Z. E. Wen, M. B. Mota, &amp; A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp.285-298). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2017.22414.2032</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4437_d7b87aceb48bbc7c96b7befff1fe2a4b.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>On Situating the Stance of Estrogen in the Acquisition and Recall of L2 Lexical Items: A Biological Look</article-title>
			        <subtitle>On Situating the Stance of Estrogen in the Acquisition and Recall of L2 Lexical Items: A Biological Look</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Shakouri</surname>
			            <given-names>Nima</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Department of English, Islamic Azad University, Roudbar Branch, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Maftoon</surname>
			            <given-names>Parviz</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Department of English, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>07</month>
			        <year>2017</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>36</volume>
			      <issue>2</issue>
			      <fpage>163</fpage>
			      <lpage>189</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>19</day>
			          <month>08</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>04</day>
			          <month>12</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2017, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4437.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4437.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>The present study examined whether the advantage of females on L2 vocabulary recall and acquisition is partly as a result of estrogen secretion or not. In this regard, through volunteer and convenience sampling 15 intermediate EFL female participants aged between 23-31 were selected from the subject pool of 55 participants. The participants were studying at Iranian Language Center located in Bandar-e Anzali, Iran. To ensure the homogeneity among the participants, Babel English Placement test was used. In the course of study, the participants were taught two series of 42 lexical items in each phase of menstrual cycles (i.e., follicular and luteal). The treatment period was held six sessions at each phase. Each session took 30 minutes. To compare the performance of the participants, immediately after the sixth session, a piloted teacher-made vocabulary recall test was administered at each phase. Finally, the mean scores of participants&#039; performance in the two phases were contrasted through a paired samples t test. The results indicated that there was a statistically significant difference between the participants&#039; recall scores in the follicular and luteal phases. Moreover, to investigate the impact of estrogen secretion on participants&#039; L2 vocabulary acquisition, two months after the treatment, the participants took a piloted teacher-made vocabulary acquisition test at each phase of menstrual cycle. The results of paired samples t test indicated a significant difference between the participants&#039; vocabulary acquisition scores in the two phases.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>Acquisition</kwd>
						<kwd>Estrogen</kwd>
						<kwd>recall</kwd>
						<kwd>Vocabulary</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Altenaichinger, A. (2003). Theories of second language acquisition. In M. Hanak-Hammerl &amp; D. Newby (Eds.), Second language acquisition: The interface between theory and practice (pp. 7-31). Graz: Graz University.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.      </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Beretta A. (1991). Theory construction in SLA: Complementarity and opposition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 493-511. doi: 10.1017/S027 2263 100010305.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Boyle, J. P. (1987). Sex differences in listening vocabulary. Language Learning,    37(2), 273–284. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00568.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Brizendine, L. (2007). Female brain. New York: Broadway Books.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Chomsky, N. (2000). The minimalist inquiries. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, &amp; J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89-155). Cambridge: MIT Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Cook, V., &amp; Singleton, D. (2014). Key topics in second language acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Eberling, J. L., Wu, C., Tong-Turnbeaugh, R., &amp; Jagust, W. J. (2004). Estrogen and tamoxifen associated effects on brain structure and function. NeuroImage, 21, 364-371. doi:10. 1016/j. neuroimage.20 03.08.037.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: OUP. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed). Oxford: OUP.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Emilien, G., Durlach, C., Antoniadis, E., van der Linden, M., &amp; Maloteaux, J. M. (2004). Memory: Neuropsychological, imaging, and psychopharmacological perspectives. New York: Psychology Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Farhady, H. (1982). Measures of language proficiency from the learner’s perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 16(1), 43–59. doi: 10.2307/3586562</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Finocchiaro, W. S., &amp; Bonomo, M. (1973). The foreign language learner: A guide to teachers. New York: Regents Publishing Company.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Geirsson, R. T. (1991). Ultrasound instead of last menstrual period as the basis of gestational age assignment. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1(3), 212–219. doi:10.1046 /j.1469-0705.1991.01030 212</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Gould, E., Woolley, C. S., Frankfurt, M., &amp; McEwen, B. S. (1990). Gonadal steroids regulate dendritic spine density in hippocampal pyramidal cells in adulthood. The Journal of Neuroscience, 10 (4), 1286-1291.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Griffiths, R. (1990). Speech rate and NNS comprehension: A preliminary study in time-benefit analysis. Language Learning, 40, 311-336.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Haier, R. J., &amp; Jung, R. E. (2008). Brain imaging studies of intelligence and creativity: What is the picture for education? Roeper Review, 30, 171-180. doi: 10.1080/0278319080 2199347.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Haist, F., Shimamura, A. P., &amp; Squire, L. R. (1992). On the relationship between recall and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 18(4), 691-702.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Hampson, E. (1990). Variations in sex-related cognitive abilities across the             menstrual cycle. Brain and Cognition, 14(1), 26-43.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Han, H. (1990). A study on the effects of sentential context learning on recall and recognition of English vocabulary (Unpublished master’s thesis).  Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Hartshorne, J. K., &amp; Ullman, M. T. (2006). Why girls say ‘holded’ more than boys. Developmental Science, 9(1), 21-32.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Herlitz, A., &amp; Rehnman, J. (2008). Sex differences in episodic memory. Association for Psychological Science, 17(1), 52-56.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Hill, A. C., Laird, A. R., &amp; Robinson, J. L. (2014). Gender differences in working memory networks: A brain map meta-analysis. Biol Psychol, 102, 18-29.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Ingalhalikar, M., Smith, A., Partker, D., Satterthaite, T. D., Elliott, M.A., Ruparel, K.&amp; Verma, R. (2013). Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain. Retrieved from http://www.pnas. org/content/111/2/8 23.full.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Kaiser, A., Haller, S., Schmitz, S., &amp; Nitsch, C. (2009). On sex/gender related similarities and differences in fMRI language research. Brain Research Reviews, 61(2), 49–59. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Kaufman, S. B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity? Intelligence, 35(3), 211-223.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge: The MIT Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Kimura, D. (2002). Sex differences in the brain. Retrieved 2016 from http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=00018E9D-879D-1D06-8E4 9809EC588EE DF. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Kolb, B., &amp; Whishaw, I. Q. (2008). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology. New York: Worth Publishers.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Lamendella, J. T. (1977). General principles of neurofunctional organization and their manifestations in primary and nonprimary language acquisition. Language Learning, 27, 155-196.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Laufer, B., &amp; Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16(1), 33-51.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Lee, E. (2011). Gender differences in medical students’ English performance. Proceedings of the 16th of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 280-283.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Levay, S. (1994). The sexual brain. London: MIT. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Lin, L. F. (2011). Gender differences in L2 comprehension and vocabulary learning in the video-based CALL program. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(2), 295-301.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Maftoon, G., &amp; Rezaei, G. (2013). Cognitive style, awareness, and learners' intake and production of grammatical structures. Journal of Language and Translation, 3(3), 1-5. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>Maki, P. M., &amp; Resnick, S. M. (2000). Longitudinal effects of estrogen replacement therapy on PET cerebral blood flow and cognition. Neurobiology of Aging, 21, 373−383.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>McClelland, J. l. (1999). Cognitive modeling, connectionist. In R. A. Wilson &amp; F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences (pp. 137-139). Cambridge: MIT Press. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>McEwen, B. S., &amp; Alves, S. E. (1999). Estrogen actions in the central nervous system. Endocrines Review 20(3),279- 307.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Mombeini, S., Gorjian, B., &amp; Pazhakh, A. (2013). The role of economic and rehearsal strategies in developing EFL learners' vocabulary recall and retention. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4(4), 283-302.  </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>Nation, P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation>Oates, J., Karmiloff-Smith, A., &amp; Johnson, M. H. (2012). Developing Brains. Retrieved 2016 from oro.open.ac.uk/33493/1/Developing _ Brains.pdf</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>Phillips, S. M., &amp; Sherwin, B. B. (1992). Effects of estrogen on memory function in surgically menopausal women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 17(5), 485-495.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and L2 development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Rastelli, S. (2014). Discontinuity in second language acquisition: The switch between statistical and grammatical learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: CUP.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation>Riley, J. L., Robinson, M., E., Wise, E. A., &amp; Price, D. D. (1999). A meta-analytic review of pain perception across the menstrual cycle. Pain, 81, 225-235.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Ross, J. L., Roeltgen, D., Feuillan, P., Kushner, H., &amp; Cutler, G. B. (2000). Use of estrogen in young girls with Turner syndrome: Effects on memory. Neurology, 54, 164–170. doi.org/10.1212/WNL. 54.1.164</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R49">
			<label>49</label>
			<element-citation>Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing second language acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R50">
			<label>50</label>
			<element-citation>Sherwin, B. B. (2012). Estrogen and cognitive functioning in women. Lessons we have learned. Behavioral Neuroscience, 126(1), 123-127.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R51">
			<label>51</label>
			<element-citation>Sousa, D. A. (2006). How the brain learns. California: Corwin Press Inc.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R52">
			<label>52</label>
			<element-citation>Speck, O., Ernst, T., Braun, J., Koch, C., Miller, E., &amp; Chang, L. (2000).    Gender differences in the functional organization of the brain for working memory. NeuroReport, 11, 2581-2585.  </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R53">
			<label>53</label>
			<element-citation>Squire, L. R. (1992). Declarative and non-declarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 4(3), 232-245.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R54">
			<label>54</label>
			<element-citation>Swan, M. (2009). We do need methods. In V. Cook &amp; L. Wei, Contemporary applied linguistics (pp. 117-136). London: Continuum. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R55">
			<label>55</label>
			<element-citation>Sylwester, R. (1995). A celebration of neurons. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R56">
			<label>56</label>
			<element-citation>Talbot, M. (1998). Language and gender. An introduction. London: Blackwell.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R57">
			<label>57</label>
			<element-citation>Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Harlow: Longman.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R58">
			<label>58</label>
			<element-citation>Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231-270. doi:10.1016/ j. 2003.10 .008.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R59">
			<label>59</label>
			<element-citation>Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The Declarative/ Procedural Model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition (pp. 141–178). Washington: Georgetown University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R60">
			<label>60</label>
			<element-citation>Ullman, M. T., Miranda, R. A., &amp; Travers, M. L. (2008). Sex differences in the neurocognition of language. In J. B. Becker, K. J. Berkley, N. Geary, E. Hampson, J. P. Herman, &amp; E. A. Young (Eds.), Sex differences in the brain from genes to behavior (pp. 291-309). Oxford: OUP.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R61">
			<label>61</label>
			<element-citation>Uster, S. (2008). The role of brain-based gender differences in the vocabulary learning and consolidation skills and strategies (Unpublished Master's thesis). Retrieved from etd.lib. metu.edu.tr /upload/12610252 /index.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R62">
			<label>62</label>
			<element-citation>Yonker, J., Eriksson, E., Nilsson, L, G., Herlitz, A. (2003). Sex differences in episodic memory: Minimal influence of estradiol. Brain and Cognition, 52, 231-238.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R63">
			<label>63</label>
			<element-citation>Yun, S., Miller, P. C., Baek, Y., &amp; Ko, M. (2008). Improving recall and transfer skills through vocabulary building in web-based second language learning: An   examination by item and feedback type. Educational Technology &amp; Society,       11(4), 158-172.  </element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>