<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2017.22369.2030</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4118_435100c47e56309e33c8cda24aad3590.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>Collaborative Output Tasks and their Effects on Learning English Comparative Adjectives</article-title>
			        <subtitle>Collaborative output tasks and their effects on learning English comparative adjectives</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Dehqan</surname>
			            <given-names>Mahmood</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>University of Mazandaran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Mohammadi Amiri</surname>
			            <given-names>Mona</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Islamic Azad University, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>05</month>
			        <year>2017</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>36</volume>
			      <issue>1</issue>
			      <fpage>1</fpage>
			      <lpage>26</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>14</day>
			          <month>08</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>25</day>
			          <month>05</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2017, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4118.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4118.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>This study aimed to examine the effect of two types of collaborative output tasks on Iranian EFL learners’ comparative adjectives with two or more syllables. Thirty Iranian EFL learners participated in this study which were then divided into two experimental and one control groups; one experimental group received dictogloss task in 4-pairs and the other experimental group was given text reconstruction editing task in 6-pairs. Using pretest, posttests and delayed posttests, the data were collected through a grammaticality judgment test (GJT) and audio-recording of the learners’ interaction. Comparing the mean scores of three groups in GJT generally indicated that experimental groups gained more than the control group and text reconstruction editing group outperformed dictogloss group in noticing and learning the English comparative adjectives with two or more syllables. The transcripts of the students&#039; verbal interactions indicated that text reconstruction editing group generated larger number of turns and language related episodes (LREs) in comparison to dictogloss group. Findings of this study also indicated that the majority of problems encountered in all the dyads were correctly solved in both dictogloss and text reconstruction editing groups, while the dictogloss group correctly solved more LREs in comparison to the text reconstruction editing group which showed that the dictogloss group was better regarding the quality of LREs. It can be concluded that the current study found evidence in support of Swain and her colleagues&#039; claims (e.g. Kowal &amp; Swain, 1994) that task implementation required the learners to produce output collaboratively which in turn leads to the internalization of grammatical features.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>Dictogloss task</kwd>
						<kwd>Text reconstruction editing task</kwd>
						<kwd>Collaborative output tasks</kwd>
						<kwd>Language-related episodes (LREs)</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Abadikhah, S. &amp; Harsini, B. (2014).Comparing the effects of collaborative and individual output tasks on the acquisition of English articles. International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies, 2(3), 23-34.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Brown, H. D (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Pearson Education.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Ghari, A. &amp; Moinzadeh, A. (2011). The effects of output task types on noticing and learning of English past modals: A case of intermediate Persian adult learners of English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1180-1190.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Mayo, M. (2002). The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL peda­gogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 156–175.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Kowal, M. &amp; Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote stu­dents’ language awareness. Language Awareness, 3(2), 73–93.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Kuiken, F. &amp; Vedder, I. (2002). The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 343–358.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Lapkin, S. &amp; Swain, M. (2000). Task outcomes: A focus on immersion students’ use of pronominal verbs in their writing. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3, 7-22.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Leeser, M. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 55-81.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Leow, R. P. (1995) Modality and intake in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(1), 79-89.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Murphy, V. A. (1997). The effect of modality on a grammaticality judgment task. Second Language Research, 13(1), 34-65.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Nassaji, H. &amp; Tian, J. (2010). Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 397-419.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Pica, T. (2005). Classroom learning, teaching, and research: A task-based perspective. Modern Language Journal, 89, 339-59.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Storch, N. (1999). Are two heads better than one? Pair work and grammatical accuracy. System, 27, 363-374.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing,14, 153-173.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Storch, N. (2007). Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes. Language Teaching Research,11, 143–159.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some rules of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass, &amp; C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–256). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G.  Cook &amp; B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), For H.G. Widdowson: Principles and practice in the study of language. A festschrift on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty &amp; J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-83). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M. (2010). Talking it through: Languaging as a source of learning. In R. Batestone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on second language use and language learning (pp. 112-130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M., Brooks, L., &amp;Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 171–185.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M., &amp; Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics,16(3), 371-391.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M. &amp; Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320-337.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M. &amp; Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, &amp; M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99-118). Harlow: Pearson Education.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M. &amp; Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285-304.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W., &amp; Brooks, L. (2009). Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. Modern Language Journal 93(1), 5-29.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Tajeddin, Z. &amp; Jabbarpoor, S. (2014). Individual and collaborative output tasks: Effects on the acquisition of English inversion structures. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 16-32.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Tocalli-Beller, A. (2003). Cognitive conflict, disagreement and repetition in collaborative groups: Affective and social dimensions from an insider’s perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60, 143–71.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Yarmohammadi, L. (2002). A contrastive Analysis of Persian and English: Grammar, Vocabulary and Phonology. Tehran: Payame Noor University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Yarmohammadi, L., &amp; Rashidi, N. (2009). Practical contrastive analysis of English and Persian with special emphasis on grammar. Tehran: Rahnama Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2017.23952.2159</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4116_4bfe2af701936098896c9ab2a2e6fd2b.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>Directed Motivational Currents: The Implementation of the Dynamic Web-Based Persian Scale among Iranian EFL Learners</article-title>
			        <subtitle>Directed Motivational Currents: The Implementation of the Dynamic Web-Based Persian Scale among Iranian EFL Learners</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Ghanizadeh</surname>
			            <given-names>Afsaneh</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Imam Reza International University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Jahedizadeh</surname>
			            <given-names>Safoura</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Ferdowsi University of Mashhad</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>05</month>
			        <year>2017</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>36</volume>
			      <issue>1</issue>
			      <fpage>27</fpage>
			      <lpage>56</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>31</day>
			          <month>12</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>03</day>
			          <month>06</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2017, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4116.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4116.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>Directed motivational current (DMC) ̶ as a novel strand in L2 motivational field ̶ is a robust motivational drive fueled by a highly valued goal and capable of stimulating and sustaining long-term behavior. The present study explored English as a foreign language students’ Directed Motivational Currents by validating the dynamic web-based Persian version of the scale, finding the most crucial motivational currents, and exploring its association with students’ proficiency and educational levels. This is accomplished by translating the DMC Disposition Scale (Muir, 2016) which measures two facets of easy flow and challenge through twelve items as the first step and utilizing the validated questionnaire to explore the most significant motivational currents of students by analyzing students’ responses on open-ended items of the questionnaire (qualitative phase) and finding the association between DMC and proficiency level as well as DMC and educational level (the quantitative phase) as the second step. The results of reliability estimates and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity indices of the Persian version of DMC Disposition Scale. The results also indicated that most of the DMCs experienced by students were competitively self-referenced experiences rather than competitively other-referenced objectives. Moreover, a significant difference was observed between elementary and upper-intermediate proficiency levels of students regarding DMC with upper-intermediate learners experiencing more levels of motivational currents than the elementary counterparts. BA and MA students of English were found to experience more levels of DMCs than diploma learners. The most significant cases in the qualitative phase as well as the discussion on both parts are presented.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>Directed Motivational Currents</kwd>
						<kwd>Mixed-methods Approach</kwd>
						<kwd>confirmatory factor analysis</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing. NewYork: MacMillan Publishing Company.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Anisfeld, E., &amp; Lambert, W. E. (1964). Evaluational reactions of bilingual and monolingual children to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69(1), 89-97.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Belmechri, F., &amp; Hummel, K. (1998). Orientations and motivation in the acquisition of English as a second language among high school students in Quebec City. Language Learning, 48(2), 219-244.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Carroll, J. B. (1958). A factor analysis of two foreign language aptitude batteries. Journal of General Psychology, 59, 3-19.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Carroll, B.J. (1972). A comprehensive English language test for speakers of English as a second language. Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Carroll, B.J. (1980). Testing communicative competence: An interim study. Oxford: Pergamon.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Cervenka, E.J. (1978). Michigan test of English language proficiency. Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., &amp; Noels, K. A. (1994). Motivation, self-confidence, and group cohesion in the foreign language classroom. Language Learning, 44(3), 417-448.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Clément, R., &amp; Kruidenier, B. G. (1985). Aptitude, attitude and motivation in second language proficiency: A test of Clément's model. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4(1), 21-37.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Covington, M. (1984). The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and implications. The Elementary School Journal, 85(1), 5-20.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Csizér, K., &amp; Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Language learners' motivational profiles and their motivated learning behavior. Language Learning, 55(4), 613-659.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Dörnyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualizing motivation in foreign-language learning. Language Learning, 40(1), 45-78.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Longman: Harlow.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Dörnyei, Z., Henry, A., &amp; Muir, C. (2016). Motivational currents in language learning: Frameworks for focused interventions. New York &amp; Abingdon, UK: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Dörnyei, Z., Ibrahim, Z., &amp; Muir, C. (2015). Directed motivational currents: Regulating complex dynamic systems through motivational surges. In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre, &amp; A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 95-105). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Dörnyei, Z., Muir, C., &amp; Ibrahim, Z. (2014). Directed motivational currents: Energising language learning through creating intense motivational pathways. In D. Lasagabaster, A. Doiz, &amp; J. M. Sierra (Eds.), Motivation and foreign language learning: From theory to practice (pp. 9-29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Dörnyei, Z., &amp; Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nded.). Harlow, UK: Longman.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Dulay, H., Burt, M. &amp; Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. New York: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Dun El, H. B. (1948). Second-language learning. Boston: Ginn.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Farhady, H. (1983). New directions in ESL proficiency testing. In J. W. Oller (Ed.) Issues in language testing research (pp. 253-269), Newbury: House Publishers.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Gardner, R. C. (1960). Motivational variables in second-language acquisition. Unpublished PhD thesis. McGill University, Montreal, Canada.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Gardner, R. C. (2001). Integrative motivation and second language acquisition. In Z. Dörnyei &amp; R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 1-19). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation> Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation and second language acquisition: The socio-educational model. New York: Peter Lang.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Gardner, R. C. (2012). Integrative motivation and global language (English) acquisition in Poland. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 215-226.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Gardner, R. C., Day, J. B., &amp; MacIntyre, P. D. (1992). Integrative motivation, induced anxiety, and language learning in a controlled environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 197-214.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Gardner, R. C., &amp; Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second-language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13(4), 266-272.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Gardner, R. C., &amp; Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second-language learning. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Gardner, R. C., &amp; MacIntyre, P. (1991). An instrumental motivation in language study: Who says it isn't effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 57-72.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Gardner, R. C., Masgoret, A.-M., Tennant, J., &amp; Mihic, L. (2004). Integrative motivation: Changes during a year-long intermediate-level language course. Language Learning, 54(1), 1-34.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Ghanizadeh, A., &amp; Jahedizadeh, S. (2015). De-motivators and their association with burnout and language achievement in an Iranian EFL context. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 7 (3), 61-85.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., &amp; Donnelly, J. H. (2000). Organizations: Behavior, structure, processes. Boston: McGraw-Hill.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Graham, J. G. (1987). English language proficiency and the prediction of academic success. TESOL Quarterly, 21(3), 98-114.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Hakuta, K. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency. Policy Reports, University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute, UC Berkeley, 1-31.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Hanania, E. &amp; Shikhani, M. (1986). Interrelationships among three tests of language proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 97-109.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>Henmon, V. A. C. (1929). Prognosis tests in the modern foreign language. Publications of the American and Canadian Committees on Modern Foreign Languages, 14, 3-31.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>Henry, A., Davydenko, S., &amp; Dörnyei, Z. (2015). The anatomy of directed motivational currents: Exploring intense and enduring periods of L2 motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 329-345.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>Hernández, T. (2006). Integrative motivation as a predictor of success in the intermediate foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 39(4), 605-617.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Hernández, T. (2008). Integrative motivation as a predictor of achievement in the foreign language classroom. Applied Language Learning, 18(1-2), 1-15.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>Ibrahim, Z. (2016). Affect in directed motivational currents: Positive emotionality in longterm L2 engagement. In P. MacIntyre, T. Gregersen, &amp; S. Mercer (Eds.), Positive psychology in second language acquisition (pp. 423- 456). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation>Igun, S. E. (2010). Difficulties and motivation of postgraduate students in selected Nigerian universities. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), Paper 369.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>Jahedizadeh, S., &amp; Ghanizadeh, A. (2015). Demotivation and foreign language achievement: Educational level and gender differences among Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching in the Islamic World, 3(6), 5-9.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Jahedizadeh, S., Ghanizadeh, A., &amp; Ghonsooly, B. (2016). The role of EFL learners’ demotivation, perceptions of classroom activities, and mastery goal in predicting their language achievement and burnout. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 16, 1-17.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Kraemer, R. (1993). Social psychological factors related to the study of Arabic among Israeli high school students: A test of Gardner's socioeducational model. Studies in Second</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>Language Acquisition, 15, 83-105.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation>Lambert, W. E., Gardner, R. C., Barik, H. C., &amp; Tunstall, K. (1963). Attitudinal and cognitive aspects of intensive study of a second language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(4), 358-368.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Lukmani, Y. M. (1972). Motivation to learn and language proficiency. Language Learning, 22(2), 261-273.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R49">
			<label>49</label>
			<element-citation>Masgoret, A.-M., &amp; Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53(1), 123-163.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R50">
			<label>50</label>
			<element-citation>McEown, M. S., Noels, K. A., &amp; Samure, K. D. (2014). Students' self-determined and integrative orientations and teachers' motivational support in a Japanese as a foreign language context. System, 45, 227-241.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R51">
			<label>51</label>
			<element-citation>Muir, C. (2016). The dynamics of intense long-term motivation in language learning: Directed Motivational Currents in theory and practice (PhD thesis). Nottingham: University of Nottingham http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/33810/</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R52">
			<label>52</label>
			<element-citation>Muir, C., &amp; Dörnyei, Z. (2013). Directed motivational currents: Using vision to create effective motivational pathways. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 357-375.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R53">
			<label>53</label>
			<element-citation>Nel, P. S., Gerber, P. D., Van Dyk, P. S., Haasbroek, G. D., Schultz, H. B., Sono, T., &amp; Werner, A. (2001). Human resource management. (6th Ed.). Cape Town: Oxford Zuniversity Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R54">
			<label>54</label>
			<element-citation>Rostami, S., Ghanizadeh, A., &amp; Ghonsooly, B. (2015). External factors affecting second language motivation: The role of teacher burnout and family influence. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 165-187.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R55">
			<label>55</label>
			<element-citation>Ryan, R., &amp; Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R56">
			<label>56</label>
			<element-citation>Sansone, C., &amp; Harackiewicz, J.M. (2000). Looking beyond rewards: The problem and promise of intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone and J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 13-56). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Published.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R57">
			<label>57</label>
			<element-citation>Schreiber, J. B., Amaury, N., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., &amp; King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A Review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-337.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R58">
			<label>58</label>
			<element-citation>Shaaban, K. A., &amp; Ghaith, G. (2000). Student motivation to learn English as a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 33(6), 632-644.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R59">
			<label>59</label>
			<element-citation>Smith, L. (2009). Model for long-term language achievement. Unpublished, copyrighted manuscript.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R60">
			<label>60</label>
			<element-citation>Stiggins, R.J. (1994). Student-centered classroom assessment. NewYork: Merrill</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R61">
			<label>61</label>
			<element-citation>Symonds, P. M. (1929). A modem foreign language prognosis test. Publications of the American and Canadian Committees on Modern Foreign Languages, 14, 91-128.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R62">
			<label>62</label>
			<element-citation>Todd, J. W. (1929). The psychological fundamentals of linguistic achievement. Publications of the American and Canadian Committees on Modern Foreign Languages, 14, 129-172.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R63">
			<label>63</label>
			<element-citation>Warden, C., A., &amp; Lin, H. J. (2000). Existence of integrative motivation in an Asian EFL setting. Foreign Language Annals, 33(5), 535-545.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R64">
			<label>64</label>
			<element-citation>Wigfield, A., &amp; Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R65">
			<label>65</label>
			<element-citation>Wimolmas, R. (2013). A survey study of motivation in English language learning of first year undergraduate students at Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology (SIIT), Thammasat University. FLLT Conference Proceedings by LITU, 2(1), 904-915.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2017.4044</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4044_4428335cca607fca4528343053d1e4de.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>Oral Pushed Output: the Route to Long-term Grammatical Accuracy</article-title>
			        <subtitle>Oral Pushed Output: the Route to Long-term Grammatical Accuracy</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Jafarpour Mamaghani</surname>
			            <given-names>Homa</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Department of English language Teaching, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Birjandi</surname>
			            <given-names>parviz</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Department of English language Teaching, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>05</month>
			        <year>2017</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>36</volume>
			      <issue>1</issue>
			      <fpage>57</fpage>
			      <lpage>84</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>26</day>
			          <month>11</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>29</day>
			          <month>04</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2017, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4044.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4044.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>This study investigated the impact of oral pushed output on the learning and retention of English perfect tenses. During the study, a pre-test was administered to 22 freshmen majoring in English translation. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups. Then, for six sessions both groups received explicit instructions on English perfect tenses. Every session, the experimental group recorded their oral performances on some picture description and translation tasks whose completion entailed the use of the instructed language form, while the control group merely did some conventional multiple choice tests covering the instructed structures. Following the treatment sessions, a post-test was run. Four weeks later, a delayed post-test was also administrated. Analysis of the data through repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) supported the facilitative effects of oral pushed output on the learning and retention of English perfect tenses. The finding of the study can have some implications for English Language Teaching (ELT) materials developers and practitioners.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>Grammatical accuracy</kwd>
						<kwd>oral channel</kwd>
						<kwd>perfect tenses</kwd>
						<kwd>pushed output</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Allan, D. (1992). Oxford placement test. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369-406.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Anderson, J. (1993). Is a communicative approach practical for teaching English in China? Pros and cons. System, 21(4), 471-480. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Andrews, S. (2007). Teacher language awareness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Azar, B. (1999). Understanding and using English grammar (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Birjandi, P., &amp; Jafarpour, M, H. (2014). The impact of immediate and delayed written pushed output produced by pre-intermediate EFL learners in Iran on their acquisition of English verb tenses. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(6)1340-1347.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Bourdin, B. &amp; Fayol, M. (2002). Even in adults, written production is still more costly than oral production. International Journal of Psychology, 37,  219-227.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Bygate, M. (2006). Areas of research that influence L2 speaking instruction. In E. Uso-Juan, &amp; A. Martinez-Flor (Eds.), current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp. 159-186). Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Byrne, S. &amp; Jones, C. (2014). Pushed and non-pushed speaking tasks in an EAP context: what are the benefits for linguistic processing and accuracy? Studies about Languages, 24, 87- 97.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>de Bot, K. (1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis.  Language Learning, 46, 529-555.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>DeKeyser, R. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195-221.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>de la Fuente, M. (2002). Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 81-112.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Duff, P. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 132-143). Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Egi, T. (2008). Investigating stimulated recall as a cognitive measure: Reactivity and verbal reports in SLA research methodology. Language Awareness, 17(3), 212-228.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (1993). The structural syllabus and SLA. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 91- 113.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 339-361). Oxford: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and pedagogy. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (2014). Principles of instructed second language learning. In M. Celce Murcia, D.M., Brinton&amp; M.A. Snow (Eds.), teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp.31-45). Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Farrokh, P. (2011). Analyzing of EFL learners' linguistic errors: Evidence from Iranian translation trainees. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(6), 676-680.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Foster, P., &amp; Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299-323.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Gilabert, R. (2007). The simultaneous manipulation of task complexity along planning time and [+/- Here-and-Now]: Effects on L2 oral production. In M. del Pilar Garcia-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 44-68). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Grabowski, J. (2005). Speaking, writing, and memory span performance: Replicating the Bourdin and Fayol results on cognitive load in German children and adults. In L. Allal &amp; J. Dolz, (Eds.), Proceedings writing 2004. Geneva (CH), Adcom Productions. [CD-ROM].</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Hartmann, P., Esparza, P., &amp; Zarian, A. (1984). Tense situations: Tenses in contrast and context. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), 541-577.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the Output Hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 168-196.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Izumi, S., &amp; Bigelow, M. (2000). Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 239-278.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M., &amp; Fearnow, S. (1999). Testing the output hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language  acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(3), 421-452.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Izumi, Y., &amp; Izumi, S. (2004). Investigating the effects of oral output on the learning of relative clauses in English: Issues in the psycholinguistic requirements for effective output tasks. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60 (5), 587-609.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Jabbari, A. A. (2004). Temporal properties of Persian and English. Humanities, 11 (3), 31-54.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Jabbarpoor, S., &amp; Tajeddin, Z. (2013). Enhanced input, individual output, and collaborative output: Effects on the acquisition of the English subjunctive Mood. Revista Signos, 46(82), 213-235.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Kobayashi, H. &amp; Rinnert, C. (1992). Effects of first language on second language writing: Translation versis direct composition. Language Leaning, 142, 183- 215.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Kowal, M., &amp; Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students' language awareness. Language Awareness, 3(2), 73-93.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>Krashen, S. (1985). The Input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York, NY: Longman.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The postmethod condition:</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>(E) merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 27- 48.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: from grammar to grammaring. Boston, MA: Thompson-Heinle.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation>Larsen-Freeman, D., Kuehn,T., &amp;Haccius. M. (2002).  Helping students make appropriate verb tense-aspect choices. TESOL, 11(4), 3-9.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 37-63.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Leeser, M. J. (2008). Pushed output, noticing, and development of past tense morphology in content-based instruction. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 65, 195-220.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>Lynch, T. (1997) Nudge, nudge: teacher intervention in task-based learner talk. ELT Journal, 51(4), 317-325.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation>Macaro, E., &amp; Masterman, L. (2006). Does intensive explicit grammar instruction make all the difference? Language</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Teaching Research, 10(3), 297-327.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R49">
			<label>49</label>
			<element-citation>Mackey, A., &amp; McDonough, K. (2000). Communicative tasks, conversational interaction and linguistic form: An empirical study of Thai. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 82-91.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R50">
			<label>50</label>
			<element-citation>Mackey, A., &amp; Oliver, R. (2002). Interactional feedback and</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R51">
			<label>51</label>
			<element-citation>children’s L2 development. System, 30, 459-477.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R52">
			<label>52</label>
			<element-citation>Mackey, A., &amp; Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and  second language development: Recasts, responses and red</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R53">
			<label>53</label>
			<element-citation>herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R54">
			<label>54</label>
			<element-citation>Mahmoudabadi, Z., Soleimani, H., Jafarigohar, M., &amp; Iravani, H. (2015). The effect of sequence of output tasks on noticing vocabulary items and developing vocabulary knowledge of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 5(1), 18-30.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R55">
			<label>55</label>
			<element-citation>Masny, D. (1991). Language learning and linguistic awareness: The relationship between proficiency and acceptability judgments in L2. In C. James &amp; P. Garrett (Eds.), Language awareness in the classroom (pp. 290-304). London, UK: Longman.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R56">
			<label>56</label>
			<element-citation>McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learner's responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79-103.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R57">
			<label>57</label>
			<element-citation>McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. NewYork, NY: Edward Arnold.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R58">
			<label>58</label>
			<element-citation>Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 617-673.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R59">
			<label>59</label>
			<element-citation>Murray, D. E. (1992). Collaborative writing as a literacy event: Implications for ESL instruction. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Collaborative language learning and teaching (pp. 100-117). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R60">
			<label>60</label>
			<element-citation>Nobuyoshi, J., &amp; Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition.  ELT Journal, 47, 103-110.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R61">
			<label>61</label>
			<element-citation>Nation, I.S.P. (2011). Second language speaking. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.445-454). New York: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R62">
			<label>62</label>
			<element-citation>Rezvani, E. (2011). The effect of output requirement on the acquisition of grammatical collocations by Iranian EFL learners.  Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(3), 674-682.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R63">
			<label>63</label>
			<element-citation>Savignon, S. (2001). Communicative language teaching for the twenty-first century. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp.13-28). Massachusetts, MA: Heinle &amp; Heinle.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R64">
			<label>64</label>
			<element-citation>Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics,11, 129- 158.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R65">
			<label>65</label>
			<element-citation>Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition . Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206 -226.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R66">
			<label>66</label>
			<element-citation>Schmidt, R., &amp; Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking  to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237- 326). Cambridge, UK: Newbury House.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R67">
			<label>67</label>
			<element-citation>Shehadeh, A. (2003). Learner output, hypothesis testing, and internalizing linguistic  knowledge. System, 31, 155- 171</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R68">
			<label>68</label>
			<element-citation>Shehadeh, A. (2005). Functions of learner output in language learning, language pedagogy, and classroom interaction. Journal of King Saud University (Languages and Translation), 17, 1‐15.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R69">
			<label>69</label>
			<element-citation>Shintani, N., Li, S., &amp; Ellis, R. (2013). Comprehension-based versus production-based grammar instruction: A meta-analysis of comparative studies.  Language Learning, 63(2), 296–329.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R70">
			<label>70</label>
			<element-citation>Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R71">
			<label>71</label>
			<element-citation>Song, M. J., &amp; Suh, B. R. (2008). The effect of output task types on noticing and learning of the English past counterfactual conditional. System, 36, 295-312.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R72">
			<label>72</label>
			<element-citation>Storch, N. (1998). A classroom-based study: Insights from a collaborative text reconstruction task. ELT Journal, 52(4), 291-300.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R73">
			<label>73</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and  comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass &amp; C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second  language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, Massachusetts, MA: Newbury  House.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R74">
			<label>74</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M. (1991). French immersion and its offshoots: Getting two for one. In B. Freed (Ed.), French language acquisition: Research and the classroom (pp. 91-103). Lexington, Massachusetts, MA: Heath.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R75">
			<label>75</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. The Canadian  Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R76">
			<label>76</label>
			<element-citation>Swain. M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook, H. Widdowson &amp; B. Seidelhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of  H.G. Widdowson (pp.125-144). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R77">
			<label>77</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-484). London, UK: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R78">
			<label>78</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M., &amp; Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371-391.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R79">
			<label>79</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M., &amp; Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320- 337.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R80">
			<label>80</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M., &amp; Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring  task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan &amp; M. Swain (Eds.), Research pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 99-118). London, UK: Pearson  Education.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R81">
			<label>81</label>
			<element-citation>Tajeddin, Z., &amp; Jabbarpoor, S. (2013). Individual and collaborative output tasks: Effects on the acquisition of English inversion structures. Research in Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 16-32.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R82">
			<label>82</label>
			<element-citation>Tavakoli, P., &amp; Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance (pp. 239–273). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R83">
			<label>83</label>
			<element-citation>Uggen, M. S. (2012). Reinvestigating the noticing function of output. Language Learning, 62, 506–540.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R84">
			<label>84</label>
			<element-citation>Van Patten, B. &amp; Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-243.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R85">
			<label>85</label>
			<element-citation>Wang, Q., &amp; Castro, C.D. (2010).  Classroom interaction and language output. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 175-186.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R86">
			<label>86</label>
			<element-citation>Yuan F., &amp; Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1-27.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2017.4043</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4043_9ee29b16af9043239f3d34930c3f5138.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>A Comparative Study of Thematicity in the Argumentative Writing of University EFL Students and the Introduction Section of Research Articles</article-title>
			        <subtitle>A Comparative Study of Thematicity in the Argumentative Writing of University EFL Students and the Introduction Section of Research Articles</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Jalilifar</surname>
			            <given-names>Alireza</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Alipour</surname>
			            <given-names>Mohammad</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Department of English Language Teaching, College of Humanities, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c3">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Rabiee</surname>
			            <given-names>Mahsa</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Department of English Language Teaching, College of Humanities, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>05</month>
			        <year>2017</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>36</volume>
			      <issue>1</issue>
			      <fpage>85</fpage>
			      <lpage>110</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>19</day>
			          <month>11</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>29</day>
			          <month>04</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2017, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4043.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4043.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>The present study aimed to find out thematic organization and progression in the argumentative writing of Iranian learners of English, representing two levels of language proficiency, and the introduction section of published Research articles (RAs) of Applied Linguistics. For this aim, 60 articles were downloaded from three journals and also 92 MA and BA students majoring in English Language Teaching and English Literature were selected. Then, three topics were used for gathering data from them. Of the written argumentative compositions, only 67 were chosen for the next phase of the study. These compositions together with the RAs were analyzed based on Halliday’s (1985) model of thematic structure and the revised model of Danes’ (1974) thematic progression patterns. The results of Chi-square suggested that there was a significant difference in the thematic structure of the essays written by MA students and the introduction section of RAs. It was concluded that thematicity can be effectively applied in classrooms to help students in writing. Students will know where they are losing their effectiveness in their arguments due to problems with either thematic progression or thematic selection, or both. The findings of this study can be effectively applied in teaching writing skills.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>Thematicity</kwd>
						<kwd>thematic organization</kwd>
						<kwd>argumentative writing</kwd>
						<kwd>introduction</kwd>
						<kwd>research articles</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Belmonte, I. A., &amp; McCabe-Hidalgo, A. (1998). Theme-rheme patterns in L2 writing. TESOL, 10, 13-31.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Brown, G., &amp; Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Coffin, C., &amp; Hewings, A. (2005). IELTS as preparation for tertiary writing: Distinctive interpersonal and textual strategies. In L. J. Ravelli &amp; R. A.  Ellis (Eds.), analysing academic writing (pp. 153-171).London: Continum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Coulthard, M. (1994). Advances in written text analysis. London: Routledge.  </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Fontain, L., &amp; Kodratoff, Y. (2003). The role of thematic and concept texture in scientific text: comparing native and non-native writers of English. Special Issue Asp. Retrieved June 3, 2014, from: http://www.lri.fr/~yk/fon-kod-eng,pdf. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Fries, P. (1983). On the status of theme in English: Arguments from discourse. In J. S. Petofi &amp; E. Sozer (Eds.), micro and macro convexity of texts (pp. 116-152). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.  </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation> Fries, P. (1990, 7). Exploring theme: Problems for research. Paper presented at 17th International Systemic Congress, Stirling, Scotland. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Fries, P. H. (1995). Themes, methods of development and texts. In R. Hasan &amp; P. H. Fries (Eds.), on subject and theme: A discourse functional perspective (pp. 317-359). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Ghadessy, M. (1999). Thematic organization in academic article abstracts. Estudios Ingleses de la Univesidad Complutense, 7, 141-161.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Gomez, M. A. (1994). The relevance of theme in the textual organization of BBC news reports. World Journal, 19, 293-305.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Jakeman, V. &amp; McDowell, C. (2009). Cambridge practice tests for IELTS. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Jalilifar, A. R. (2010a). Thematization in EFL students’ composition writing and its relation to academic experience. RELC Journal, 41(1), 31- 45.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Jalilifar, A. R. (2010b). The status of theme in applied linguistics articles. The Asian ESP Journal, 6(2), 7-39.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Jianghong, M., Hairong, W., &amp; Xiangfeng, C. (2005). Implications and applications of theme-rheme theory to the teaching of EFL reading. Celea Journal, 28, 18-22.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Martinez, I. A. (2003). Aspects of theme in the method and discussion sections of biology journal article in English. Journal of English for Academic Purpose, 2, 103-23.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Matthiessen, C., &amp; Halliday, M. A. K. (1997). Systemic functional grammar: A first step into the theory. Retrieved September 5, 2014, from http://www.SFGintro (peng chapter) New.com</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>McCabe, A. (1999). Theme-rheme patterns in L2 writing. TESOL, 10, 13-31.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>North, S. (2005). Disciplinary variation in the use of theme in undergraduate essays. Applied Linguistics, 26, 431-452.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Ostrom, J., &amp; Cook, W. (1993) Paragraph writing simplified. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Rafiei, K., &amp; Modirkhamene, S. (2012). Thematicity in published vs. unpublished Iranian TEFL theses. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(6), 1206-1213.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Ramage, J. D., Bean, J. C., &amp; Johnson, J. (2009). Writing arguments: A rhetoric with readings (8th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research setting. Cambridge: CUP.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Thornbury, S. (1999). How to teach grammar. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Wang, I. (2007). Theme and rheme in the thematic organization of texts: Implications for teaching academic writing. Asian EFL Journal, 9(1), 164-176.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Whittaker, R. (1995). Thematic development in academic and non-academic texts. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), thematic development in English texts (pp. 105-128). London: Printer.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Zhou, Y. (2006). The interpersonal metafunction and theme in English and Chinese advertisement texts. US-China Foreign Language, 4, 46-50.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2017.4045</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4045_bbcdf500ebafef878ba98a92bc1510bc.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>An Assessment Scheme for ELT Performance: An Iranian Case of Farhangian University</article-title>
			        <subtitle>An Assessment Scheme for ELT Performance: An Iranian Case of Farhangian University</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Kiany</surname>
			            <given-names>Gholamreza</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Tarbiat Modares University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Nabi Karimi</surname>
			            <given-names>Mohammad</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>kharazmi university</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c3" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Norouzi</surname>
			            <given-names>Monireh</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Tarbiat Modares University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>05</month>
			        <year>2017</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>36</volume>
			      <issue>1</issue>
			      <fpage>111</fpage>
			      <lpage>144</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>24</day>
			          <month>10</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>29</day>
			          <month>04</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2017, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4045.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4045.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>Accountability concerns in language education call for the development of more valid and authentic measures of assessment. In light of these concerns, performance assessment has received increasing interest in the context of teacher education programs and teacher licensing over the last decade. In Iran, a recent policy adopted by Farhangian University aims at assessing the professional competencies of its ELT graduates by requiring them to go through a performance assessment as part of the licensing requirements. Mounting concerns regarding the validity of traditional tests used for teacher certification (Mitchell, Robinson, Plake, &amp; Knowles, 2001) have motivated Farhangian University to develop its own performance assessment. Therefore, the present study explored the components of the performance assessment through detailed analysis of the Curriculum Document of the English Major, review of literature, and investigation of the stakeholders&#039; perspectives. To this end, in this exploratory study, convenience, purposive, and cluster sampling procedures were used for the selection of the teacher educators, student-teachers, and mentor teachers. Then, in-depth interviews were conducted with the stakeholders. Finally, based on the content analysis of the above-mentioned sources which resulted in a strong agreement, a performance assessment scheme with seventeen items was developed. However, results of the factor analysis yielded a thirteen-factor performance assessment scheme to be used as the criterion for assessing the professional competencies of student-teachers.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>assessment</kwd>
						<kwd>performance assessment</kwd>
						<kwd>accountability</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Akbari, R., &amp; Dadvand, B., (2011). Does formal education make a difference? A comparison of pedagogical thought units of BA vs. MA teachers. Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 44-60.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., &amp; Walker, D. (2014). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Beare, H. (1989). The Australian policy context. Teacher appraisal issues and approaches. Austrailian Council for Educational Research.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Berliner, D. C. (2005). The near impossibility of testing for teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 205–213.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Brophy, J., &amp; Good, T. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Bunch, G. C., Aguirre, J. M., &amp; Téllez, K. (2009). Beyond the scores: Using candidate responses on high stakes performance assessment to inform teacher preparation for English learners. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(1), 103–128.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Chung, R. R. (2007). Beyond the ZPD: When do beginning teachers learn from a high-stakes portfolio assessment? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. Retrieved from</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>          https://scale.stanford.edu/system/files/RRChungAERA2007_0.pd</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Cizek, G. J., &amp; Bunch, M. B.(2007). Standard setting: A guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests. UK. Thousand Oaks.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Clement, M. C. (2010). Preparing teachers for classroom management: The teacher educator's role. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 77(1), 41-44.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Cochran-smith, M. (2010). Foreword. In M. M., Kennedy (Ed.), Teacher assessment and the quest for teacher quality: A handbook (pp. xiii-1). San Francisco: John Wiley &amp; Sons.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Corbin, J., &amp; Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift fur Soziolgie, JG, 19, 418-427.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Danielson, C. (2011). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Danielson, C., &amp; Marquez, E. (1998). A collection of performance tasks and rubrics: High school mathematics. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Danielson, C., &amp; McGreal, T. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional   practice. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: How teacher performance assessments can measure and improve teaching. Center for American Progress.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Darling-Hammond, L., &amp; Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 523–545.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Delandshere, G., &amp; Arens, S. A. (2003). Examining the quality of evidence in preservice teacher portfolios. Journal of Teacher Education, 54 (1), 57–73.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2004). Removing barriers to achievement: the Government’s strategy for SEN (London, DfES Publications).</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>DuFour, R., &amp; Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Solution Tree Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Edwards, C. H. (1993). Classroom discipline and management. New York: Macmillan Publishing.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Ellett, C. (1990). A new generation of classroom-based assessments of teaching and learning: Concepts, issues and controversies from pilots of the Louisiana STAR. Baton Rouge: College of Education, Louisiana State University.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. New York: Jossey-Bass.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Gasper, M. F., &amp; Vieira, C. R., (2013). Plentitude teacher evaluation for teacher effectiveness and well-being with neuro-linguistic programming. US-China Education Review, 3(1), 1-17.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Gass, S. M., &amp; Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Gatbonton, E. (2008). Looking beyond teachers’ classroom behaviour: Novice and experienced ESL teachers' pedagogical knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 161–182.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Hatch, E. M., &amp; Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. New York, NY: Newbury House Publishers.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Haertel, E. H. (1991). New forms of teacher assessment. Review of Research in Education, 17, 3–29.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Hamilton, L. (2003). Assessment as a policy tool. Review of Research in Education, 27, 25–68.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Hodge, K. J., &amp; Morgan, G. B. (2014). The stability of teacher performance and effectiveness: Implications for policies concerning teacher evaluation. Education Policy Analysis Archive, 22.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Isoré, M. (2009), Teacher evaluation: Current practices in OECD countries and a literature review, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 23, OECD Publishing.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Jackson, C., Simoncini, K., &amp; Davidson, M. (2013). Classroom profiling training: Increasing preservice teachers’ confidence and knowledge of classroom management skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(8), 30-46.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Koirala, H. P., Davis, M., &amp; Johnson, p. (2008). Development of a performance assessment task and rubric to measure prospective secondary school mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and skills. Journal of Math Teacher Education, 11,127–138.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Kyriacou, C. (2007). Essential teaching skills. London, England: Nelson Thornes Ltd.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>McBer, H. (2000). Research into teacher effectiveness. A model of teacher effectiveness (Vol. 216). Research report.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>McCormick, J &amp; Shi, G. (1999). Teachers' attributions of responsibility for their occupational stress in the people's Republic of China and Australia. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(3), 393-407.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>McGreal, T. M. (1988). Evaluation for enhancing instruction: Linking teacher evaluation and staff development. In Stanley, S. J., &amp; Popham, W. J. (Ed.). Teacher evaluation: Six prescriptions for success. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>McKenzie, P., Rowley, G., Weldon, P., &amp; Murphy, M. (2011). Staff in Australia’s schools 2010: Report prepared for the department of education, employment and workplace relations. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>McLeod, J. (2003). Time and classroom space. In J. McLeod, J. Fisher, &amp; G. Hoover. The key elements of classroom management. Managing time and space, student behavior, and instructional strategies. Association for supervision and curriculum development</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation>Medley, D. M. (1982). Teacher competency testing and the teacher educators. Association of Teacher Educators and the Bureau of Educational Research, University of Virginia.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>Miles, M. B., &amp; Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Mitchell, K. J., Robinson, D. Z., Plake, B.S., &amp; Knowles, K.T. (2001). Testing teacher candidates, the role of licensure tests in improving teacher quality. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Nouri, A. &amp; Mehrmohammadi, M. (2011). A model for applying the grounded theory in educational research. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23, 8-35.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>Navidinia, H., Kiani, G. R., Akbari, R., &amp; Ghaffar Samar, R. (2015). EFL teacher performance evaluation in Iranian high schools: Examining the effectiveness of the status quo and setting the Groundwork for developing an alternative model. The International Journal of Humanities, 21(4), 27-53.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation>Ofsted (2006). The annual report of her majesty’s chief inspector of schools 2005/2006. London: The Stationery Office.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Pecheone, R., &amp; Chung, R.R. (2006). Evidence in teacher education: The performance assessment for California teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(1), 22-36.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R49">
			<label>49</label>
			<element-citation>Peterson, K. D. (2000). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices (2nd Ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R50">
			<label>50</label>
			<element-citation>Prybylo, D. (1998). Beyond a positivistic approach to teacher evaluation. Journal of school Leadership, 8, 558-583.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R51">
			<label>51</label>
			<element-citation>Reeves, D. B. (2004). Accountability for learning: How teachers and school leaders can take charge. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R52">
			<label>52</label>
			<element-citation>Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., &amp; Horn, S. P. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation.Journal of personnel evaluation in education, 11(1), 57-67.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R53">
			<label>53</label>
			<element-citation>Sandholtz, J. H. (2012). Predictions and performance on the PACT teaching event: Case studies of high and low performers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 39(3),103-126.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R54">
			<label>54</label>
			<element-citation>Selvester, M. P., Summers, D., &amp; Williams, F. E. (2006). Costs and benefits of accountability: A case study of credential candidates’ performance assessment. Issues in Teacher Education, 15(1), 21-36.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R55">
			<label>55</label>
			<element-citation>Shinkfield, A. J., &amp; Stufflebeam, D. L. (1995). School professionals’ guide to improving teacher evaluation systems. In Teacher Evaluation (pp. 81-172). Springer Netherlands.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R56">
			<label>56</label>
			<element-citation>Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(4), 4-14.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R57">
			<label>57</label>
			<element-citation>Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R58">
			<label>58</label>
			<element-citation>Skinner, E. A., &amp; Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R59">
			<label>59</label>
			<element-citation>Skowron, J. (2001). Powerful lesson planning models: The art of 1,000 decisions. Arlington Heights, IL: Sky Light Training and Publishing.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R60">
			<label>60</label>
			<element-citation>Taut, S., &amp; Sun, Y. (2014). The development and implementation of a national, standards-based, multi-method teacher performance assessment system in Chile. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22 (71).</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R61">
			<label>61</label>
			<element-citation>Torgerson, C. W., Macy, S. R., Beare, P., &amp; Tanner, D. E. (2009). Fresno assessment of student teachers: A teacher performance assessment that informs practice. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(1).</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R62">
			<label>62</label>
			<element-citation>Whitaker, T. (2004). What great teachers do differently: Fourteen things that matter most. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R63">
			<label>63</label>
			<element-citation>Zeichner, K. M., &amp; Liston, D. P. (1987). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review, 57(2), 3-48.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2017.4066</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4066_0d750e857e09cb988fec90035ee0dafa.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>Syntactic Structures and Rhetorical Functions of Electrical Engineering, Psychiatry, and Linguistics Research Article Titles in English and Persian: A Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Study</article-title>
			        <subtitle>Syntactic Structures and Rhetorical Functions of Electrical Engineering, Psychiatry, and Linguistics Research Article Titles in English and Persian: A Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Study</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Shahidipour</surname>
			            <given-names>Vahid</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>PhD Candidate, Applied Linguistics, Sheikhbahaee University, Isfahan, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Alibabaee</surname>
			            <given-names>Ahmad</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Assistant Professor, Applied Linguistics, Department of Foreign Languages, Sheikhbahaee University, Isfahan, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>05</month>
			        <year>2017</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>36</volume>
			      <issue>1</issue>
			      <fpage>145</fpage>
			      <lpage>175</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>07</day>
			          <month>01</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>24</day>
			          <month>05</month>
			          <year>2017</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2017, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4066.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4066.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>A research article (RA) title is the first and foremost feature that attracts the reader&#039;s attention, the feature from which she/he may decide whether the whole article is worth reading. The present study attempted to investigate syntactic structures and rhetorical functions of RA titles written in English and Persian and published in journals in three disciplines of Electrical Engineering, Psychiatry, and Linguistics. To this end, 750 English and 750 Persian RAs were randomly selected from reputable English and Persian journals in these fields and syntactic structures of their titles were analyzed based on Dietz’s (1995) taxonomy. The results revealed that, despite some similarities, there were some cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary differences in title structures. The differences were found in title components and title length and style. Generally, English titles were shorter in length than Persian ones. Psychiatry titles were the longest, whereas Linguistics ones were the shortest. Although the majority of titles were single-unit ones, English authors used multiple-unit titles more than Persian ones. Multiple-unit titles were also employed the most in Linguistics RAs. No significant difference was found regarding combinations of multiple-unit titles in the two languages; however, topic-description combinations were the most frequent in Electrical Engineering and Linguistics titles, whereas topic-method ones were the most popular in Psychiatry titles. Moreover, the post-modified nominal group construction was the most frequent syntactic structure across single-unit titles. Such findings can contribute to the developments of English for Specific Purposes and provide some information about Persian and English RA titles structures in different disciplines.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>research article titles</kwd>
						<kwd>syntactic structures</kwd>
						<kwd>title style and length</kwd>
						<kwd>English and Persian title components</kwd>
						<kwd>English for specific purposes</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Anthony, L. (2001). Characteristic features of research article titles incomputer science. IEEE Transactions on ProfessionalCommunication, 44(3), 187-194.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing genre: language use in professional settings. London: Longman</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Bhatia, V. K. (2008). Genre analysis, ESP and professional practice. English for Specific Purposes, 27(2), 161-174.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Busch-Lauer, I. (2000). Titles in English and German research papers in medicine and linguistics. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Analysing professional genres (pp.77-97). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.         </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Buxton, A. B., &amp; Meadows, A. J. (1977). The variation in the information content of titles of research papers with time and discipline. Journal of Documentation, 33(1), 46-52.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Cheng, S. W., Kuo, C. W., &amp; Kuo, C. H. (2012). Research article titles in applied linguistics. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 6(1), A1-A14.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Day, R. A. (1994). How to write and publish scientific papers. Phoenix: Oryx Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Dudley-Evans, T. (1984). A preliminary investigation of the writing of dissertation titles. In G. James (Ed.), The ESP classroom: methodology, materials, expectations (pp. 40-46). Exeter: Exeter Linguistic Studies.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 219-228). London: Rutledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Goodman, N. W. (2000). Survey of active verbs in the titles of clinical trials reports. British Medical Journal, 320, 914-915.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Haggan, M. (2004). Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: Dimensions of attraction. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(2), 293-317.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.), London: Edward Arnold.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). Things and relations: Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. In J. R. Martin &amp; R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourse of Science (pp. 185-235). London: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Hamp-Lyons, L. (1987). Study writing: A course in written English for academic and professional purposes. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Hartley, J. (2007). Planning that title: Practices and preferences for titles with colons in academic articles. Library and Information Science Research, 29(4), 553–568.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Jalilifar, A. R. (2010a). Research article introductions: Sub-disciplinary variations in applied linguistics. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 2(2), 29-55.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Jalilifar, A. R. (2010b).Writing titles in applied linguistics: A comparative study of theses and research articles. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 2(1), 27-52.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Jalilifar, A., Hayati, A., &amp; Mayahi, N. (2010). An Exploration of Generic Tendencies in Applied Linguistics Titles. Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities, 5, 35-57.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Jalilifar, A. R., Hayati, A. M., &amp; Namdari, N. (2012). A comparative study of research article discussion sections of local and international applied linguistic journals. The journal of Asia TEFL, 9(1), 1-29.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Jamali, H. R., &amp; Nikzad, M. (2011). Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations. Scientometrics, 88(2), 653-661.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Kane, T. S. (2000). Oxford Essential Guide to writing. Oxford: Berkley Publishing Group.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Kanoksilapatham, B. (2007). Writing scientific research articles in Thai and English: Similarities and differences. Sitpakorn University International Journal, 7, 172- 203.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Manten, A. A., &amp; Greenhalgh J. F. D. (1977) Titles of scientific papers. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2(1), 1-6.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Marefat, H., &amp; Mohammadzadeh, S. (2013). Genre analysis of literature research article abstracts: A cross-linguistic, cross-cultural study. Applied Research on English Language, 2(2), 37-50.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Moattarian, A., &amp; Alibabaee, A. (2015). Syntactic Structures in Research Article Titles from Three Different Disciplines: Applied Linguistics, Civil Engineering, and Dentistry. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 7(1), 27-50.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Moore, A. (2010). ‘What’s in a title? A two-step approach to optimisation for man and machine’. BioEssays, 32, 183–184.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Nagano, L. R. (2015). Research article titles and disciplinary conventions: A corpus study of eight disciplines. Journal of Academic Writing, 5(1), 133-144.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30(4), 479-497.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Salager-Meyer, F., &amp; Ariza, M. A. A. (2013). Titles are "serious stuff": A historical study of academic titles. JAHR, 4(7), 257-271.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Soler, V. (2007). Writing titles in science: An exploratory study. English for Specific Purposes, 26(1), 90-102.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research setting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Swales, J. M., &amp; Feak, C. B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Michigan: Michigan UniversityPress.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Talebinezhad, M., Arbabi, Z., Taki, S., &amp; Akhlaghi, M. (2012). Rhetorical variation in medical article abstracts written in English and Persian. Journal of Teaching Language Skill, 3(4), 127-144.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Wang, Y., &amp; Bai, Y. (2007). A corpus-based syntactic study of medical research article titles. System, 35(3), 388-399.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Yitzhaki, M. (1994). Relation of title length of journal articles to number of authors. Scientometrics, 30, 321-332.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>Yitzhaki, M. (2002). Relation of the title length of a journal article to the length of the article. Scientometrics, 54 (3), 435-447.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>