<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2016.3922</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3922_e1c5a53c1ee6d25c42a824dc5d5f6576.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>A Social Semiotic Analysis of Social Actors in English-Learning Software Applications</article-title>
			        <subtitle>A Social Semiotic Analysis of Social Actors in English-Learning Software Applications</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Babaii</surname>
			            <given-names>Esmat</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Kharazmi University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Atai</surname>
			            <given-names>Mahmood Reza</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Kharazmi University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c3" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Kafshgarsouteh</surname>
			            <given-names>Masoumeh</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Kharazmi University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>10</month>
			        <year>2016</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>35</volume>
			      <issue>3</issue>
			      <fpage>1</fpage>
			      <lpage>40</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>14</day>
			          <month>07</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>28</day>
			          <month>12</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2016, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3922.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3922.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>This study drew upon Kress and Van Leeuwen’s (2006, [1996]) visual grammar and Van Leeuwen’s (2008) social semiotic model to interrogate ways through which social actors of different races are visually and textually represented in four award-winning English-learning software packages.  The analysis was based on narrative actional/reactional processes at the ideational level; mood, perspective, social distance, and modality at the interpersonal level; and salience, framing, and vector at the compositional level. The findings revealed that although contemporary multimodal texts have tried to be unbiased and neutral in the verbal mode, there are still traces of discrimination, bias, and stereotyping in the visual mode. The results of this research can be of potential help and use for researchers, pedagogues, material developers, software designers,  teachers , and students to become visually literate and get aware of the hidden messages that can be communicated by images in textbooks and multimedia.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>social actors</kwd>
						<kwd>visual and verbal modes</kwd>
						<kwd>compositional metafunctions</kwd>
						<kwd>race</kwd>
						<kwd>stereotyping</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Abbas-Nejad-Konjin, A. (2012). Gender analysis of Iranian middle school textbooks. (Unpublished MA thesis). UBC, Vancouver, Canada.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Adami, E.  (2013). A social semiotic multimodal analysis framework for website interactivity. London: National Center for Research Methods.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Ansary, H., &amp; Babaii, E. (2003). On the manifestation of subliminal sexism in current Iranian secondary school ELT textbooks. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6, 57-69.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Babaii, E., &amp; Ansary, H. (2001, March). The structure of and stricture on TV Commercials in Iran. Paper presented at the 5th Conference on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. Tehran: Allameh Tabataba'i University.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Baldry, A. P. (2000). Multimodality and multimodality in the distance learning age. Campobasso, Italy: Palladino Editore.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Baldry, A. P. (2004). Phase and transition type and instance: patterns in media texts as seen through a multimodal concordancer. In K. L. O’Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis (pp. 83-108). London: Continuum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Baldry, A. P., &amp; Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis. London: Equinox.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text. London: Fontana/Collins.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Belknap, P., &amp; Leonard, W. M. (1991). A conceptual replication and extension of Erving Goffman’s study of gender advertisements. Sex Roles, 25(3/4)103-118.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: BBC/Harmondsworth: Penguin.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Binns, J. C., &amp; Branch, R. C. (1995). Gender stereotyped computer clip-art images as an implicit influence in instructional message design. ERIC: ED 3080089</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Bishop, H., &amp; Jaworski, A. (2003). We beat ‘em’: nationalism and the hegemony of homogeneity in the British press reportage of Germany versus England during Euro 2000. Discourse &amp; Society, 14(3), 243–271.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Brand, J. E., Knight, S., &amp; Majewski, J. (2003). The diverse worlds of computer games: A content analysis of spaces, populations, styles and narratives. Paper presented at Digital Games Research Conference, The Netherlands. ISBN / ISNN: ISSN 2342-9666.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. (2003). Cross-Cultural Representation of ‘Otherness’ in Media Discourse. In G. Weiss &amp; R. Wodak, (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis:Theory and interdisciplinarity (pp. 272-296). New York: Palgrave McMillan.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Caldas-Coulthard, C. R., &amp; Iedema, R. (2008). Identity trouble: Critical discourse and contested identities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Camiciottoli, B. C.  (2007). The language of business studies lectures. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Canning-Wilson, C. (1999).  Using pictures in EFL and ESL classrooms. ERIC No: ED 445526. Retrieved from the ERIC database</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Chappell, K. K. (1996). Mathematics computer software characteristics with possible gender-specific impact: A content analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15, 25–35.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Chiew, A. (2004). Multisemiotic mediation in hypertext. In K. L. O’Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic-functional perspectives (pp. 131-162). London: Continuum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Coelho, Z. P. (2008). Front page layout and reading paths: The influence of age on newspaper reading. Estudos em Comunicação, 4, 1-14.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Drees, D. E., &amp; Phye, G. D. (2001). Gender representation in children’s language arts computer software. Journal of Educational Research, 95, pp. 49–55.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London and New York: Longman.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Gamson, W. A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., &amp; Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18,373-393.  </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Gharbavi, A. &amp; Mousavi, S. A. (2012). The application of functional linguistics in exposing gender bias in Iranian high school English textbooks. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(1), 85-93.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Goffman, E. (1979). Gender advertisements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Graci, J. P. (1989). Are foreign language textbooks sexist? Exploration of models of evaluation. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 77-86. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb02771.x</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Griffiths, Th. (2010). Media representation theory. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/Tomaskas/media-representation-theory.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Guijarro, J. M., &amp; Sanz, J. M. P. (2008). Compositional, interpersonal and representational meanings in a children’s narrative: A multimodal discourse analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 40,1601–1619.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Hartman, P. L., &amp; Judd, E. L. (1978). Sexism and TESOL materials. TESOL Quarterly, 12(4), 383-393.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Hellinger, M. (1980). For men must work, and women must weep: Sexism in English language textbooks used in German schools. In C. Kramerae (Ed.), The voices and words of women and men (pp. 267-274).New York: Pergamon Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Hietala, V. (1996). The reality of the images. Introduction to the understanding and interpretation of visual culture. Helsinki: Kirjastopalvelu.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Hjorth, J. (1997). Presentation of females and males in an English textbook series for Finnish upper-secondary schools (Unpublished Pro Gradu Thesis). University of Jyväskylä, Finland. Retrieved from https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/handle/123456789/7366</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>Horváth Futó, H. (2011). Textbooks and stereotypes. Philologica, 3(2), 265-278.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>Iedema, R. (2001). Analyzing film and television: A social semiotic account of hospital: An unhealthy business. In T. Van Leeuwen, &amp; C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 183-204). London: Sage. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemioticization: extending the analysis of discourse as a multisemiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Jarić, I. (2002). Gender Stereotypes. Nova srpska politička misao, 2(Special issue), 5-19.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>Jewitt, C. (2004). Multimodality and new Communication technologies. In P.  LeVine &amp; R. Scollon (Eds.) Discourse and Technology: Multimodal discourse analysis (pp. 184-195). Washington: Georgetown University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation>Jewitt, C. (2005). Multimodality, ‘Reading’, and ‘Writing’ for the 21st Century. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(3), 315-331.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>Jones, R. S. (2005). Sites of engagement as sites of attention: time, space and culture in electronic discourse. In S. Norris, &amp; R. H. Jones (Eds.), Discourse in action. Introducing mediated discourse analysis (pp. 141-154). London: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on Technology in Learning and Teaching Languages. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 183-210.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Knox, J. S. (2009). Punctuating the home page: image as language in an online newspaper. Discourse &amp; Communication, 3(2), 145–172.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>Kordjazi, Z. (2012). Images matter: A semiological content analysis of gender positioning in contemporary English-learning software applications. Novitas-ROYAL 6(1), 59-80.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation>Kress, G., &amp; Van Leeuwen, Th. (2006 [1996]). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd Ed.). London: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Lee, J. F. K., &amp; Collins, P. (2006). Gender Representation in Hong Kong English Textbooks. Retrieved from http://www.eoc.org.hk/eoc/upload/2006711112336211184.pdf.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R49">
			<label>49</label>
			<element-citation>Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In R. Martin &amp; R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: critical and functional perspectives on discourse and science (pp. 87-113). London: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R50">
			<label>50</label>
			<element-citation>Lemke, J. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299–325.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R51">
			<label>51</label>
			<element-citation>Lester, P. (2000). Visual communication: Images with messages. Belmont. CA: Wadsworth/Thomson.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R52">
			<label>52</label>
			<element-citation>Lim Fei, V. (2007). The visual semantics stratum: making meaning in sequential images. In T. D., Royce, &amp; W. L., Bowcher (Eds.), New Directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp. 195–213).Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R53">
			<label>53</label>
			<element-citation>Lim Fei, V. &amp; O‘Halloran, K. (2010, Accepted for Publication).  The ideal teacher: An analysis of a teacher-recruitment advertisement. Semiotica.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R54">
			<label>54</label>
			<element-citation>Liu, Y., &amp; O’Halloran, K. L. (2009; accepted for publication). Inter-semiotic Texture: Analyzing cohesive devices between language and images. Social Semiotics.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R55">
			<label>55</label>
			<element-citation>Machin, D., &amp; Mayr, A. (2007). Antiracism in the British government's model regional newspaper: the ‘talking cure’. Discourse &amp; Society, 18(4), 453–477.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R56">
			<label>56</label>
			<element-citation>Machin, D., &amp; Van Leeuwen, T. (2009). Toys as discourse: Children’s toys and the war on terror. Critical Discourse Studies, 6(1), pp. 51-63.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R57">
			<label>57</label>
			<element-citation>Mazid, B. M. (2008). Cowboy and misanthrope: a critical (discourse) analysis of Bush and bin Laden cartoons. Discourse &amp; Communication, 2(4), 433-457.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R58">
			<label>58</label>
			<element-citation>Milburn, S.S., Carney, D. R., &amp; Ramirez, A. H. (2001). Even in modern media, the picture is still the same: A content analysis of clipart images. Sex Roles, 44, 277-294.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R59">
			<label>59</label>
			<element-citation>Moebius, W. (1986). Introduction to picturebooks codes. Word and Image, 2, 141–158.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R60">
			<label>60</label>
			<element-citation>Nodelman, P. (1988). Words about pictures: The narrative art of children’s picturebooks. athens: The University of Georgia Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R61">
			<label>61</label>
			<element-citation>Nodelman, P. (1999). Decoding the images. How picture books work. In P. Hunt (Ed.), Understanding children’s literature (pp. 129–139). London/New York: Routledge. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R62">
			<label>62</label>
			<element-citation>Norris, S. (2004). Multimodal discourse analysis: A conceptual framework. In P. LeVine, &amp; R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and technology. Multimodal discourse analysis (pp. 101-115). Washington: Georgetown University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R63">
			<label>63</label>
			<element-citation>O’Halloran, K. L. (2000). Classroom discourse in mathematics: a multi-semiotic analysis. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 359–388.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R64">
			<label>64</label>
			<element-citation>O’Halloran, K. L. (2004). Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic-functional perspectives. London: Continuum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R65">
			<label>65</label>
			<element-citation>O'Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London and New York: Continuum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R66">
			<label>66</label>
			<element-citation>O'Halloran, K. L. (2009). Multimodal analysis and digital technology, In A. Baldry &amp; E. Montagna (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on multimodality: Theory and practice, proceedings of the third international conference on multimodality (pp. 1-26). Campobasso: Palladino.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R67">
			<label>67</label>
			<element-citation>O’Halloran, K. L. (in press 2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In K.  Hyland, &amp; B. Paltridge (Eds.), Companion to discourse (pp. 1-33). London and New York: Continuum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R68">
			<label>68</label>
			<element-citation>O’Halloran, K. L., Podlasov, A., Chua, A. &amp; K. L. E., M. (2012). Interactive software for multimodal analysis. Visual Communication, 11(3), 363–381.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R69">
			<label>69</label>
			<element-citation>Ollivier, K. E. (1992). Gender stereotyping in elementary school textbooks (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University of British Colombia, Vancouver, Canada.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R70">
			<label>70</label>
			<element-citation>Otlowski, M. (2003). Ethnic diversity and gender bias in EFL textbooks. Asian EFL Journal 5(3), 1-15.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R71">
			<label>71</label>
			<element-citation>O'Toole, M. (2010 [1994]). The Language of displayed art (2nd Ed). London and New York: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R72">
			<label>72</label>
			<element-citation>Pauwels, L. (2012). A multimodal framework for analyzing websites as cultural expressions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 247–265.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R73">
			<label>73</label>
			<element-citation>Peterson, S., &amp; Kroner, T. (1992). Gender biases in textbooks for introductory psychology and human development. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 17-37.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R74">
			<label>74</label>
			<element-citation>Porreca, K. L. (1984). Sexism in current ESL textbooks. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 704-707.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R75">
			<label>75</label>
			<element-citation>          Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586584.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R76">
			<label>76</label>
			<element-citation>Poulou, S. (1997). Sexism in the discourse roles of textbook dialogues. Language Learning, 15, 68-73.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R77">
			<label>77</label>
			<element-citation>          Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09571739785200141.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R78">
			<label>78</label>
			<element-citation>Prodromou, L. (1988). English as cultural action. ELT Journal, 42(2), 73-83.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R79">
			<label>79</label>
			<element-citation>Reese, L. (1994). Gender equality and texts. Social Studies Reviews, 33, 12-15.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R80">
			<label>80</label>
			<element-citation>Royce, T. D. (1998). Synergy on the page: Exploring intersemiotic complementarity in pagebased multimodal text. In JASFL Occasional Papers 1 (pp. 25–49). Tokyo, Japan: Association of Systemic Functional Linguistics ( JASFL).</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R81">
			<label>81</label>
			<element-citation>Royce, T. D. (2002). Multimodality in the TESOL classroom: Exploring visual-verbal synergy. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 191-205.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R82">
			<label>82</label>
			<element-citation>Royce, T. D. (2007). Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. In T. D. Royce, &amp; W. L. Bowcher (Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp. 63–110). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R83">
			<label>83</label>
			<element-citation>Sheldon, J. P.  (2004). Gender stereotypes in educational software for young children. Sex Roles, 51, 433-444.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R84">
			<label>84</label>
			<element-citation>Sunderland, J. (1992). Gender in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 46, 81-91.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R85">
			<label>85</label>
			<element-citation>Tahririan, M. H., &amp; Sadri, E. (2013). Analysis of images in Iranian high school EFL course books. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 137-160.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R86">
			<label>86</label>
			<element-citation>Thibault, P. J. (2000). The multimodal transcription of a television advertisement: Theory and practice. In A. Baldry (Ed.), Multimodality and multimediality in the distance learning age (pp. 31-84). Lampo: Campo Basso.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R87">
			<label>87</label>
			<element-citation>Thompson, K. (2002). A critical discourse analysis of world music as the 'other' in education. Research Studies in Music Education, 19(14), 14-21.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R88">
			<label>88</label>
			<element-citation>Unsworth, L. (2008). Multiliteracies and metalanguage: describing image/text relations as a resource for negotiating multimodal texts. In D. L. D. Corio, M. Knobel, &amp; C. Lankshear (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 377- 405). New Jersey: Erlbaum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R89">
			<label>89</label>
			<element-citation>Unsworth, L., &amp; Wheeler, J. (2002). Re-valuing the role of images in reviewing picture books. Reading: Language and Literacy, 36(2), 68–74.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R90">
			<label>90</label>
			<element-citation>Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin &amp; H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-371). Oxford: Blackwell.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R91">
			<label>91</label>
			<element-citation>Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation.  Discourse &amp; Society, 17(2), 359–383.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R92">
			<label>92</label>
			<element-citation>Van Leeuwen, T. (2003). A multimodal perspective on composition. In T. Ensink &amp; C. Sauer (Eds.), Framing and perspectivising in discourse (pp. 23-62). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R93">
			<label>93</label>
			<element-citation>Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R94">
			<label>94</label>
			<element-citation>Ventola, E., Charles, C, &amp; Kaltenbacher, M. (Eds.) (2004). Perspectives on multimodality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R95">
			<label>95</label>
			<element-citation>Young, K. (2009). Applying multimodal analysis to popular websites to develop students’ digital literacy. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computers in Education. Hong Kong: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2016.3872</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3872_400e0e420dbd6d3d997614b0230491c3.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>The Emergence of Various Contradictions in Iranian High School English Education under the New CLT-Based Curriculum</article-title>
			        <subtitle>The emergence of various contradictions in Iranian high school English education under the new CLT-based curriculum</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Barabadi</surname>
			            <given-names>Elyas</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>University of Bojnord</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Razmjoo</surname>
			            <given-names>Seyyed Ayatolla</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Pprofessor in TEFL, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>10</month>
			        <year>2016</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>35</volume>
			      <issue>3</issue>
			      <fpage>41</fpage>
			      <lpage>64</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>15</day>
			          <month>04</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>30</day>
			          <month>10</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2016, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3872.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3872.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>Recent research has indicated that the adoption of CLT in an EFL contexts will create certain challenges. Using Engeström’s (1999) human activity system model, the present study investigated the implementation of CLT-based curriculum which was initiated in 2013 in Iranian public schools. Four groups of participants including 23 language teachers, 17 teacher directors, 23 students, and 20 parents took part in the study. Semi-structured interviews, observation of participating teachers’ classes, and analysis of relevant documents were used as data collection tools. Grounded theory analysis of the data revealed three main categories explaining the difficulty of CLT implementation in an EFL context like Iran. From an activity theory perspective, these categories indicated that the four layers of contradictions emerged in Iranian English Education as the activity system. The results suggest that not only language teachers as the subjects of the current activity system, but also other components of the activity system, and even other activity systems like teachers’ colleges and in-service programs need to work in tandem in order to overcome the challenges of implementation.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>activity system</kwd>
						<kwd>CLT-based curriculum</kwd>
						<kwd>Grounded Theory</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Ahn, k. (2009). Learning to teach within the curricular reform context: A sociocultural perspective on english student teachers’practicum experience in south korea. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Ahn, K. (2009). Learning to teach within the curricular reform context: A sociocultural perspective on English student teachers’practicum experience in South Korea (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th Ed.). Orlando, FL: Hacourt Brace College Publishers.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Bartels, N. (2005). Applied linguistics and language teacher education: What we know. In N. Bartels (Ed.), applied linguistics and language teacher education (pp. 405-425). London: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2954-3</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Berns, M. (1990). Contexts of competence: Social and cultural considerations in communicative language teaching. New York: Plenum Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9838-8</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Borg, S. (2011). Language teacher education. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 215-228). London: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Burns, A. (2009). Action research in second language teacher education. In A. Burns &amp; J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 289-297). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Carless, D. R. (2001). A case study of curriculum implementation in Hong Kong. In D.R. Hall &amp; A. Hewings (Eds.), Innovation in English Language Teaching (pp.263-274). NY: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Carless, D. R. (2003). Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools. System, 31(4), 485-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2003.03.002</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin &amp; Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 507-535).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Dahmardeh, M. (2009). English language teaching in Iran and communicative language teaching. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), The University of Warwick, Institute of Education.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, &amp; R. Punamaki. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit. Retrieved September, 2002 from http://communication.ucsd.edu/MCA/Paper/Engestrom/expanding.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Fullan, M. (1998). Education reform: are we on the right track? Education Canada, 38(3), 1- 7.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Hiramatsu, S. (2005). Contexts and policy reform: A case study of EFL teaching in a high school in Japan. In D. J. Tedick (Ed.), Second language teacher education: International perspectives (pp. 113-134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Hu, G. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China. Language Culture and Curriculum, 15(2), 93-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07908310208666636</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Incecay, G., &amp; Incecay, V. (2009). Turkish university students’ perceptions of communicative and non-communicative activities in EFL classroom. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 618-622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.110</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Kim, H., R. (2004). Exploring the role of a teacher in a literature-based EFL classroom through communicative language teaching. English Teaching, 59(3), 29-52.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Kim, E.-J. (2008). In the midst of curricular reform: An activity theory analysis of teachers’ and students’ experiences in South Korea (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Kramsch, C., &amp; Sullivan, P. (1996). Appropriate pedagogy. ELT Journal, 50(3), 199–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.3.199</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Lantolf, J. P., &amp; Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of L2 development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Lee, S. (2007). Preservice EFL teachers’ perceptions of their student teaching experiences. English Teaching, 62(4), 355-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.15858/engtea.62.4.200712.355</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Lincoln, Y., &amp; Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Littlewood, W. (2013). Developing a context-sensitive pedagogy for communication-oriented language teaching. English Teaching, 68(3), 3-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.15858/engtea.68.3.201309.3</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Markee, N. (1994). Curricular innovation: issues and problems. Applied Language Learning, 5(2), 1-30.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Maxwell, A. J. (1996). Qualitative research design; an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication, Inc.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Sakui, K. (2004). Wearing two pairs of shoes: language teaching in Japan. ELT Journal, 58(2), 155-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.2.155</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Secretariat of the Higher Council of Education. (2006). Collection of regulations by the Higher Council of Education. Tehran, Iran: Madrese.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Wang, H. (2006). An implementation study of the English as a foreign language curriculum policies in the Chinese tertiary context (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Warford, M. K. (2011). The zone of proximal teacher development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 252-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.008</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2016.3901</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3901_07819661c2d773b6218c8c2dafebe372.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>Do We Need Discipline-Specific Academic Word Lists? Linguistics Academic Word List (LAWL)</article-title>
			        <subtitle>Do We Need Discipline-Specific Academic Word Lists? Linguistics Academic Word List (LAWL)</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>moini</surname>
			            <given-names>raouf</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>University of Kashan</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Islamizadeh</surname>
			            <given-names>Zahra</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>University of Kashan</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>10</month>
			        <year>2016</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>35</volume>
			      <issue>3</issue>
			      <fpage>65</fpage>
			      <lpage>90</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>30</day>
			          <month>07</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>20</day>
			          <month>12</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2016, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3901.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3901.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>This corpus-based study aimed at exploring the most frequently-used academic words in linguistics and compare the wordlist with the distribution of high frequency words in Coxhead’s Academic Word List (AWL) and West’s General Service List (GSL) to examine their coverage within the linguistics corpus. To this end, a corpus of 700 linguistics research articles (LRAC), consisting of approximately 4 million words from four main linguistics sub-disciplines (phonology, morphology, semantics and syntax) was compiled and analyzed based on two criteria; frequency and range. Based on the analysis, a list consisting of 1263 academic word families was produced to provide a useful linguistics academic word list for native and non- native English speakers. Results showed that AWL words account for 10.18 % of the entire LRAC, and GSL words account for 72.48% of the entire LRAC. The findings suggested that of 570 word families in Coxhead’s AWL, 381 (66.84%) word families correspond with the word selections criteria which provide 29.88% of the word families in Linguistics Academic Word List (LAWL). Furthermore, 224 word families that were frequently used in linguistic research article corpus (LRAC) were not listed in GSL and AWL. They accounted for 18.51% of the word families in LAWL with coverage of 5.07% over LRAC, and compared with the 2000 GSL, 658 word families were identified. The results have pedagogical implications for linguistics practitioners and EAP practitioners, researchers, and material designers.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>academic word list</kwd>
						<kwd>general service list</kwd>
						<kwd>research articles</kwd>
						<kwd>English for academic purposes</kwd>
						<kwd>corpus linguistics</kwd>
						<kwd>academic writing</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Baur, L. &amp; Nation, I. S. P. (1993). Word families. International journal of lexicography, 6(3),          1-27.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Billuroglu, A., &amp; Neufeld, S. (2005). The bare necessities in lexis: A new           perspective in   vocabulary profiling. Retrieved April 20, 2015, from http://lextutor.ca/vp/BNL_Rational.doc on December 13, 2008.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Billuroglu, A., &amp; Neufeld, S. (2007). BNL 2709: The essence of English (4th ed).        Nicosia: Rustem Kitabevi.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Campion, M., &amp; Elley, W. (1971). An academic vocabulary list. Wellington: New Zealand     Council for Educational Research.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Chen, Q. &amp; Ge, G. (2007). A corpus-based lexical study on frequency and distribution of         Coxhead’s AWL word families in medical research articles (RAs). English for       Specific Purposes, 26, 502-514.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Chung, T. &amp; Nation, I. S. P. (2003). Technical vocabulary in specialized texts. Reading in a     Foreign Language, 15(2),103-116.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Chung, T., &amp; Nation, I. S. P. (2004). Identifying technical vocabulary, System, 32, 251-263.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Cobb, T., &amp; Horst, M. (2004). Is there room for an Academic Word List in French? In P. Boggards, &amp; B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language (pp.15-38)    . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Engels, L., K. (1968). The fallacy of word counts. International Review of Applied Linguistics,         6, 213-231.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Farrell, P. (1990). A lexical analysis of the English of electronics and a study of semi-     technical vocabulary. CLCS Occasional Paper No.25 Trinity College.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Ghadessy, P. (1979). Frequency counts, word lists, and materials preparation: A new    approach. English Teaching Forum, 17, 24-27.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Heatly,A., Nation, I. S. P., Coxhead, A. (2002). Range and Frequency Programs.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>          Retrieved from: http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/staff/Paul_Nation.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Hyland, K., &amp; Tse, P. (2007). Is there an "academic Vocabulary"? TESOL Quarterly, 41(2),   235-253.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Khani, R., &amp; Tazik, K. (2013). Towards the development of an academic word list for applied linguistics research articles. RELC journal. 44(2), 195-214.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Lam, J (2001). A study of semi-technical vocabulary in computer science texts, with special       reference to ESP teaching and lexicography. Research reports, Vol.3. Language    Center. Hong Kong University of Science &amp; Technology.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Li, Y., Qian, D.D. (2010). Profiling the academic word list (AWL) in a financial corpus.            System 38, 402-411.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Li, S.-L., &amp; Pemberton, R. (1994). An investigation of students’ knowledge of academic and    Sub-technical vocabulary. In L. Flowerdew &amp; A. K. K.Tong (Eds.), Entering text (pp.           183-196). Hong Kong: The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Liu, J. &amp; Han, L. (2015). A corpus-based environmental academic word list building and          its validity test. English for Specific Purposes, 39, 1-11.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Lynn, R. W. (1973). Preparing word lists: a suggested method. RELC Journal, 4(1), 25-32.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Martinez, I. A. Beck, S., &amp; Panza, C.B (2009). Academic vocabulary in Agriculture: A             corpus-based study. English for specific purposes, 28, 183-198.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Mudraya, O. (2006). Engineering English. A lexical frequency instruction model. English for     Specific Purposes, 25, 235-256.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Mungra, P. &amp; Canziani, T. (2013). Lexicographic studies in medicine: Academic Word List       for clinical case. Lberica, 25, 39-62.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Nation, I., S., P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle &amp; Heinle    Publishers.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Nation, P.  &amp; Hwang, K. (1995). Where would general service vocabulary stop and special      purposes vocabulary begin? System 23(1), 35-41.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language.  Cambridge:  Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Nation, I. S. P. (2016). Making and using word lists for language learning and testing. John Benjamins Publishing Company.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Paquot, M. (2007). Towards a productively-oriented academic wordlist. In J. Walinski, K. Kredens, &amp; S. Gozdz-Roszkowski        (Eds.), PALC Proceedings (pp. 127- 140).Frankfurt: Peter    Lang.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Praninskas, J. (1972). American university word list. London: Longman.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Shaw, P. (1991). Science research students’ composing process. English for Specific Purposes, 10, 189-206.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Swales,J. M. (1990). Genre analysis.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Thurstun, J., &amp; Candlin, C. N. (1998). Concording and the teaching of the vocabulary   academic English. English for Specific Purposes, 17(3), 267-280.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Valipoori, L., &amp; Nassaji, H. (2013). A corpus-based study of academic Vocabulary in chemistry research articles. English for Academic Purposes, 12, 248-263.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Vongpumivitich, V., Huang, J., &amp; Chung, Y. (2008). Frequency analysis of the words in the      Academic Word List (AWL) and non-AWL content words in applied linguistics           papers. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 33-41.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Wang, J., Liang, S., &amp; Ge, G. (2008). Establishment of a medical Academic wordlist. English  for Specific Purposes, 27(4), 442–458.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>Ward, J. (1999). How large a vocabulary do EAP engineering students need? Reading in a      foreign language, 12(2), 309-324.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>Ward, J. &amp; Chuenjundaeng, J. (2009). Suffix knowledge: Acquisition and applications.   System, 37(3), 461-469.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>West, M. (1953). A General Service List of English Words. London:  Longman, Green &amp; Co.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Xue, G., &amp; Nation, I. S. P. (1984). A University word list. Language   learning and    communication, 3, 215-229.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>Yang, M. N. (2015). A nursing academic word list. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 27-38.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2016.3923</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3923_7fe5414d196e89f2e7f3454ade4cec12.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>Motivational Beliefs, Self-Regulation and EFL Listening Achievement: A Path Analysis</article-title>
			        <subtitle>Motivational beliefs, self-regulation and EFL listening achievement: A path analysis</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Nasrollahi-Mouziraji</surname>
			            <given-names>Alieh</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Department of English, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Teharn, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Birjandi</surname>
			            <given-names>Parviz</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Department of English, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Teharn, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>10</month>
			        <year>2016</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>35</volume>
			      <issue>3</issue>
			      <fpage>91</fpage>
			      <lpage>118</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>24</day>
			          <month>06</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>28</day>
			          <month>12</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2016, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3923.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3923.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>Informed by the expectancy-value and social cognitive theories of learning, the present study proposed a path model to investigate the impact of motivational beliefs as defined by listening self-efficacy, three types of goal orientations, and task value on self-regulation of Iranian EFL learners, in addition to the unique contribution of each to the variability in the listening comprehension score. Results of path analysis revealed significant positive effect of listening self-efficacy and self-regulation on students’ listening comprehension and task value on self-regulation. Unlike performance approach goals, mastery and performance avoidance goals demonstrated a significant impact on participants’ self-regulation but no significant direct effect of any goals on listening achievement was detected.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>goal orientations</kwd>
						<kwd>listening comprehension</kwd>
						<kwd>listening self-efficacy</kwd>
						<kwd>self-regulation</kwd>
						<kwd>task value</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Al-Harthy, I. &amp; Was, C (2013). Knowledge monitoring, goal orientations, self-efficacy, and academic performance: A path analysis. Journal of College Teaching &amp; Learning, 10(4), 263-278. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Al-Harthy, I., Was, C., &amp; Isaacson, R. (2010). Goals, efficacy and metacognitive self-regulation: A path analysis. International Journal of Education, 2, 1-20. doi: 10.5296/ije.v2i1.357</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structure and motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261 -271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Ames, C. &amp; Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom. Students’ learning strategies and motivation process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Anderman, E. M., &amp; Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 811-831.doi:10.1002/tea.3660310805 </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Bae, J., &amp; Bachman, L. F. (2010). An investigation of four writing traits and two tasks across two languages. Language Testing, 27(2), 213-234. doi: 10.1177/0265532209349470 </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Clinical and Social Psychology, 4, 359-373.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25(5), 729–735.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248-287. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning.  Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Bong, M. (2001). Between- and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task-value and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 23-34. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.23</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Bouffard, T., Bouchard, M., Goulet, G., Denoncourt, I., &amp; Couture, N. (2005). Influence of achievement goals and self-efficacy on students’ self-regulation and performance. International Journal of Psychology, 40(6), 373 384. doi:10.1080/00207590444000302</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Brophy, J. (2005). Goal theorists should move on from performance goals. Educational Psychologist, 40(3), 167-176. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4003_3</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Button, S., Mathieu, J., &amp; Zajac, D. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 26–48.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd Ed.). New York: Routledge. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Deci, E. L., &amp; Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Eccles, J. S., &amp; Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents ‘achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225. doi: 10.1177/0146167295213003</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Elliot, A.J., &amp; Harackiewicz, J.M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461-475. doi: 0022-3514196/53.00</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Elliot, A. J., &amp; Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality &amp; Social Psychology, 82, 804-818. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.804</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Ghanizadeh, A., &amp; Mirzaei, S. (2012). EFL learners’ self-regulation, critical thinking, and language achievement. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 451-468. doi:10.5296/ijl.v4i3.1979</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Gorban Doordinejad, F., &amp; Afshar, H. (2014). On the relationship between self-efficacy and English achievement among Iranian third grade high school students. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(4), 461-470.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Ghonsooly, B., &amp; Elahi, M. (2010). Learner’ self-efficacy in reading and its relation to foreign language reading anxiety and reading achievement. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 217, 45-67.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55–75. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective. System, 34, 165-182. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2005.11.001</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Graham, S. (2011). Self-efficacy and academic listening. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 113-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.04.001   </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Graham, S., &amp; Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58, 747-783. doi:  10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00478.x</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Kassem, H. M. (2015). The relationship between listening strategies used by Egyptian EFL college sophomores and their listening comprehension and self-efficacy. English Language Teaching, 8(2), 159-169. doi:10.5539/elt.v8n2p153</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Keskin H. K. (2014). A Path analysis of metacognitive strategies in reading, self-efficacy and task value. International J. Soc. Sci. &amp; Education 4(4), 798-808.  </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Kitsantas, A., &amp; Zimmerman, B. (2009). College students’ homework and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-regulatory beliefs. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 97–110. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9028-y</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Liem, A., Lau, S., &amp; Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486-512. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Meece, J.L., Blumenfeld, P.C., &amp; Hoyle, R.H. (1988). Students’ goal orientation and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514-523.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Meece, J.L., Wigfield, A., &amp; Eccles, J.S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrolment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60-70</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Mendelsohn, D. (2006). Learning how to listen using learning strategies. In J. Us´o, &amp;F. Mart´ınez (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp.75–90). Berlin: Walter de Gryuter.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>Middleton, M., Kaplan, A., &amp; Midgley, C. (1998). Achievement goal orientation and self-efficacy: Different goals, different relations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>Middleton, M., &amp; Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of educational psychology, 89, 710-718.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>Midgley, C., Maehr, M., Hruda, L., Anderman, E., Anerman, L., Freeman, K., Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Mills, N., Pajares, F., &amp; Herron, C. (2006). A reevaluation of the role of self-efficacy, anxiety, and their relation to reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 276–295. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02266.x</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>Pintrich, P. R. (1986). Motivation and learning strategies interactions with achievement. Developmental Review, 6, 25-56.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation> Pintrich, P.R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames &amp; M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement motivation enhancing environments (pp. 117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31 (6), 459-70.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, &amp; M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego: Academic Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Pintrich, P. R., &amp; De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40. doi: 0022-O663/90/500.75</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>Pintrich, P. R. &amp; Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications. Englewood Cliffs: Merrill.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation>Pintrich, P.R., &amp; Schunk, D.H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications. NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Rahimpour, M., &amp; Nariman-Jahan, R. (2010). The influence of self-Efficacy and proficiency on     EFL learners’ writing. Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 7(11), 19-32.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R49">
			<label>49</label>
			<element-citation>Rezaei, A.R., Keivanpanah, S., &amp; Najibi, S. (2015). EFL learners’ motivational beliefs and their use of learning strategies. Applied Research on English Language, 4(1), 1-17.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R50">
			<label>50</label>
			<element-citation>Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 199-217. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02034.x</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R51">
			<label>51</label>
			<element-citation>Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children’s achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93-105. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R52">
			<label>52</label>
			<element-citation>Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and cognitive achievement: Implications for students with learning problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 14-22.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R53">
			<label>53</label>
			<element-citation>Schunk, D. H. (1994). Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions in academic settings. In D. H. Schunk &amp; B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 75-99). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R54">
			<label>54</label>
			<element-citation>Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 85–94.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R55">
			<label>55</label>
			<element-citation>Schunk, D. H., &amp; Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R56">
			<label>56</label>
			<element-citation>Vandergrift, L. (2004). Learning to listen or listening to learn. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 3-25. doi: 10.1017/S0267190504000017</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R57">
			<label>57</label>
			<element-citation>Vandergrift, L., &amp; Goh, C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: metacognition in action. New York: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R58">
			<label>58</label>
			<element-citation>Wigfield, A., &amp; Cambria, J. (2010).  Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R59">
			<label>59</label>
			<element-citation>Wigfield, A., &amp; Eccles, J. S. (1992).The development of achievement task value: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R60">
			<label>60</label>
			<element-citation>Wolters, C. A., Yu, S. L., &amp; Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goals orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 211-238.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R61">
			<label>61</label>
			<element-citation>Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329-339. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R62">
			<label>62</label>
			<element-citation>Zimmerman, B. J. (2000a). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn.  Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1016</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R63">
			<label>63</label>
			<element-citation>Zimmerman, B.J.  (2000b). Attaining self-regulation:  A social cognitive perspective.  In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, &amp; M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R64">
			<label>64</label>
			<element-citation>Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R65">
			<label>65</label>
			<element-citation>Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., &amp; Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663-676.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R66">
			<label>66</label>
			<element-citation>Zimmerman, B. J., &amp; Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845–862. doi:10.2307/1163397</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2016.3924</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3924_b3fa45f14017563eeca9b2a4591148a4.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>Built-In Learner Participation Potential of Locally- and Globally-Designed ELT Materials</article-title>
			        <subtitle>Built-In Learner Participation Potential of Locally- and Globally-Designed ELT Materials</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Pourhaji</surname>
			            <given-names>Mostafa</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>University of Tehran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Alavi</surname>
			            <given-names>Seyed Mohammad</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>University of Tehran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c3">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Karimpour</surname>
			            <given-names>Sedigheh</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>University of Tehran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>10</month>
			        <year>2016</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>35</volume>
			      <issue>3</issue>
			      <fpage>119</fpage>
			      <lpage>156</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>06</day>
			          <month>07</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>28</day>
			          <month>12</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2016, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3924.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3924.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>This study aims at empirically measuring a universal criterion for materials evaluation, i.e., learning opportunities, in a locally- and a globally-designed materials. Adopting the conceptual framework of sociocultural theory and its conceptualization of learning as participation (Donato, 2000), the researchers utilized the methodological power of conversation analysis to examine how opportunities for learner participation and, by extension, learning are created whilst the materials are being used. Thirty teachers’ naturally-occurring classroom interactions, evolving from the two types of materials, was videotaped and transcribed line-by-line to identify the interactional contexts in which learner participation opportunities are embedded. Four interactional contexts affording different levels of learner interactional space were prompted by both types of materials. Examining the distribution of contexts revealed that management-oriented and form-oriented contexts were sustained significantly longer in classes with the locally-designed material. The globally-designed material, however, tended to unfold significantly longer skill-oriented and meaning-oriented contexts suggesting higher levels of built-in learner participation potential. The findings of this study raise materials developers’ awareness, especially in periphery communities, about how materials can either marginalize or empower learners in classroom interaction.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>conversation analysis</kwd>
						<kwd>interactional contexts</kwd>
						<kwd>learner participation</kwd>
						<kwd>materials evaluation</kwd>
						<kwd>Sociocultural theory</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Akbari, R. (2008). Postmethod discourse and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 42(4), 641–652.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Brown, D. (2014). The power and authority of materials in the classroom ecology. The Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 658–661.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Brown, J. B. (1997). Textbook evaluation form. The Language Teacher, 21(10), 15–21.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Canagarajah, A. S. (Ed.). (2004). Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Candlin, C. N., &amp; Breen, M. (1980). Evaluating and designing language teaching materials. Practical Papers in English Language Education Vol. 2. Lancaster: Institute for English Language Education, University of Lancaster.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Cunningsworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. London: Heinemann.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Daoud, A. M., &amp; Celce-Murcia, M. (1979). Selecting and evaluating a textbook. In M. Celce-Murcia &amp; L. McIntosh (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 302–307). New York: Newbury House.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27–50). New York: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of English language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51(1), 36–42.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Fernandez del Viso Roman, V. (2012). Optimizing classroom interaction: An interview with Steve Walsh. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching and Learning Language and Literature, 5(4), 69–74.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Fox, B. A., &amp; Thompson, S. A. (2010). Responses to wh-questions in English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(2), 133–156.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Garton, S., &amp; Graves, K. (2014). Identifying a research agenda for language teaching materials. Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 654–657.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Grant, N. (1987). Making the most of your textbook. Harlow, UK: Longman.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Guerrettaz, A. M., &amp; Johnston, B. (2013). Materials in the classroom ecology. Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 779–796.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Harwood, N. (Ed.). (2010). English language teaching materials: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Heritage, J. (1999). CA at century’s end: Practices of talk-in-interaction, their distributions and their outcomes. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 69–76.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Heritage, J. (2005). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In K. L. Fitch &amp; R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 103–147). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Hutchinson T., &amp; Torres E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315–328.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Islam, C., &amp; Mares, C. (2003). Adapting classroom materials. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 86–100). London: Continuum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Jacknick, C. M. (2011). But this is writing: Post-expansion in student-initiated sequences. Novitas-Royal (Research on Youth and Language), 5(1), 39–54.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Jefferson, G. (1983). Notes on some orderliness of overlap onset. Tilburg Paper in Language and Literature, No. 28. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Jarvis, J., &amp; Robinson, M. (1997). Analyzing educational discourse: An exploratory study of teacher response and support to pupils’ learning. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 212–228.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Jolly, D., &amp; Bolitho, R. (2011). A framework for materials writing. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed., pp. 107–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Kasper, G. (2004). Participant orientations in German conversation-for-learning. Modern Language Journal, 88, 551–567.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Kasper, G. (2006). Beyond repair: Conversation analysis as an approach to SLA. AILA Review, 19, 83–99.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Larsen-Freeman, D. (2014). It’s about time. Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 665–666.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Littlejohn, A. (2011). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan horse. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed., pp. 179–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Markee, N., &amp; Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 491–500.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Masuhara, H., Hann, M., Yi, Y., &amp; Tomlinson, B. (2008). Adult EFL courses. ELT Journal, 62(3), 294–312.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>McDonough, J., &amp; Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>McDonough, J., Shaw, C., &amp; Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and methods in ELT (3rd Ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Mukundan, J., &amp; Ahour, T. (2010). A review of textbook evaluation checklists across four decades (1970–2008). In B. Tomlinson &amp; H. Masuhara (Eds.), Research for materials development in language learning: Evidence for best practice (pp. 336–352). London: Continuum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>Nation, I. S. P., &amp; Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. New York: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation>Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>Pourhaji, M. &amp; Alavi, S. M. (2015). Identification and distribution of interactional contexts in EFL classes: The effect of two contextual factors. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 7(15), 93–123.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Richards, J. C. (2010). Series editor’s preface. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory and practice (pp. ix–xi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>Rowe, M. B. (1974). Wait time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence in language, logic, and fate control: Part 1. Wait time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11(2), 81–94.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation>Roberts, J. T. (1996). Demystifying materials evaluation. System, 24(3), 375–389.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Rubdy, R. (2003). Selection of materials. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 72–85). London: Continuum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R49">
			<label>49</label>
			<element-citation>Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., &amp; Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R50">
			<label>50</label>
			<element-citation>Saslow, J., &amp; Ascher, A. (2011). Top notch: English for today’s world. NY: Pearson Education Inc.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R51">
			<label>51</label>
			<element-citation>Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 99–128.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R52">
			<label>52</label>
			<element-citation>Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R53">
			<label>53</label>
			<element-citation>Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R54">
			<label>54</label>
			<element-citation>Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237–246.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R55">
			<label>55</label>
			<element-citation>Sinclair, J.  M., &amp; Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R56">
			<label>56</label>
			<element-citation>Skierso, A. (1991). Textbook selection and evaluation. In M. Celce-Murcia, (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 432–453). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R57">
			<label>57</label>
			<element-citation>Slimani, A. (1989). The role of topicalization in classroom language learning. System, 17, 223–234.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R58">
			<label>58</label>
			<element-citation>Tarone, E. (2014). The issue: Research on materials and their role in classroom discourse and SLA. Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 652–653.  </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R59">
			<label>59</label>
			<element-citation>Ten Have, P.  (2007). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R60">
			<label>60</label>
			<element-citation>Thornbury, S. (2014). Correspondence. ELT Journal, 68(1), 109–110.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R61">
			<label>61</label>
			<element-citation>Tomlinson, B. (2001). Materials development. In R. Carter &amp; D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 66–71). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R62">
			<label>62</label>
			<element-citation>Tomlinson, B. (2003). Materials evaluation. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 15–36). London: Continuum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R63">
			<label>63</label>
			<element-citation>Tomlinson, B. (2010). Principles of effective materials development. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory and practice (pp. 81–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R64">
			<label>64</label>
			<element-citation>Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2011). Materials development for language teaching (2nd Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R65">
			<label>65</label>
			<element-citation>Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143–179.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R66">
			<label>66</label>
			<element-citation>Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2013). Developing materials for language teaching (2nd Ed.). New York: Bloomsbury Academic. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R67">
			<label>67</label>
			<element-citation>Tomlinson, B., &amp; Masuhara, H. (2004). Developing language course materials. Singapore: RELC Portfolio Series.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R68">
			<label>68</label>
			<element-citation>Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R69">
			<label>69</label>
			<element-citation>Van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R70">
			<label>70</label>
			<element-citation>Van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social- interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245–260). New York: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R71">
			<label>71</label>
			<element-citation>Vine, E. W. (2008). CA and SCT: Strange bedfellows or useful partners for understanding classroom interactions? Discourse Studies, 10, 673–693.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R72">
			<label>72</label>
			<element-citation>Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R73">
			<label>73</label>
			<element-citation>Wallace, M. J. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R74">
			<label>74</label>
			<element-citation>Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: Teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 3–23.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R75">
			<label>75</label>
			<element-citation>Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. New York: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R76">
			<label>76</label>
			<element-citation>Walsh, S. (2012). Conceptualising classroom interactional competence. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 6(1), 1-14.  </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R77">
			<label>77</label>
			<element-citation>Waring, H. Z. (2008). Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities. Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 577–594.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R78">
			<label>78</label>
			<element-citation>Waring, H. Z. (2009). Moving out of IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning, 59(4), 796–824.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R79">
			<label>79</label>
			<element-citation>Williams, D. (1983). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. ELT Journal, 37(3), 251–255.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R80">
			<label>80</label>
			<element-citation>Wong, J., &amp; Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers. New York: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R81">
			<label>81</label>
			<element-citation>Xie, X. (2011). Turn allocation patterns and learning opportunities. ELT Journal, 65(3),240–250.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R82">
			<label>82</label>
			<element-citation>Yaqubi, B., &amp; Pourhaji, R. M. (2012). Teachers’ limited wait-time practice and learners’ participation opportunities in EFL classroom interaction. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 4(10), 127–161.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2016.3900</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3900_7c3680806f15dda3d7f5ae12d256eefa.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>Critical Thinking in Personal Narrative and Reflective Journal Writings by In-service EFL Teachers in Iran: Assessment of Reflective Writing</article-title>
			        <subtitle>Critical Thinking in Personal Narrative and Reflective Journal Writings by In-service EFL Teachers in Iran: Assessment of Reflective Writing</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Sabah</surname>
			            <given-names>Somayyeh</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Department of English Language, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Rashtchi</surname>
			            <given-names>Mojgan</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>10</month>
			        <year>2016</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>35</volume>
			      <issue>3</issue>
			      <fpage>157</fpage>
			      <lpage>182</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>10</day>
			          <month>08</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>07</day>
			          <month>12</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2016, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3900.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3900.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>Recently, there is a need for fostering the critical reflective side of L2 teacher education. This study investigated the implications of personal narrative (PN) and reflective journal (RJ) writing for Iranian EFL teachers’ reflective writing. Sixty (36 women and 24 men) in-service secondary school EFL teachers were selected based on the convenience sampling from Iran. L2 teachers equally divided into PN and RJ writing groups were provided with particular short stories. L2 teachers in the PN writing group engendered PN writings in response to themes of stories; however, L2 teachers in the RJ writing group had to write their reflections on stories in RJ writings. Hatton and Smith’s (1995) framework was used for the content analysis of data. The quantitative analysis indicated that PN writings were lengthier than RJ writings. Also, there was a statistically significant difference between mean ranks of descriptive and critical reflection writing types signified in PN and RJ writings. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between mean ranks of descriptive reflection and dialogic reflection writing types. Moreover, PN and RJ writings were more descriptive, less descriptive reflective, less and less dialogic reflective, and still less critical reflective. The qualitative analysis revealed that EFL teachers’ PN and RJ writings enjoyed dialogicity. Despite their unwillingness to express voice, findings indicated that Iranian English teachers adopted a more critical perspective through generating PN writings than via engendering RJ writings. In general, the English language teacher education domain in Iran needs a thinking renewal to foster critical L2 teaching. </p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>critical L2 teacher education</kwd>
						<kwd>critical thinking</kwd>
						<kwd>personal narrative writing</kwd>
						<kwd>reflective journal writing</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Abednia, A. (2012). Teachers’ professional identity: Contributions of a</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>critical EFL teacher education course in Iran. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 706-717.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Abednia, A., Hovassapian, A., Teimournezhad, S., &amp; Ghanbari, N. (2013). Reflective journal writing: Exploring in-service EFL teachers’ perceptions. System, 41(3), 503-514.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Achebe, C. (1953). Dead men’s path. Retrieved September 20, 2012, from http://www.sabanciuniv.edu/HaberlerDuyurular/Documents/  F_Courses_ Courses_/2012/Dead_ Mens_ Path.pdf</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Akbari, R. (2007). Reflections on reflection: A critical appraisal of</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>reflective practices in L2 teacher education. System, 35(2), 192-207.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Allin, L., &amp; Turnock, C. (2007). Reflection on and in the work place.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Retrieved April 16, 2014, from www.practicebasedlearning.org/</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>resources/resources/materials/intro.htm </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Amer, A. A. (2003). Teaching EFL/ESL literature. The Reading Matrix,   </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>3(2), 63-73.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX:</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>University of Texas Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Barkhuizen, G. (2011). Narrative knowledging in TESOL. TESOL</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Quarterly, 45(3), 391-414.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Brown, B., Matthew-Maich, N., &amp; Royle, J. (2001). Fostering reflection and reflective practice. In E. Rideout (Ed.), Transforming nursing education through problem-based learning (pp. 119-164). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Chan, E. Y. (2012). The transforming power of narrative in teacher</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 111-127.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Chopin, K. (1894). The story of an hour. Retrieved March 25, 2014,</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>from http://www.vcu.edu/engweb/webtexts/hour/</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Clark, R., &amp; Ivanič, R. (1999). Raising critical awareness of language: A</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>curriculum aim for the new millennium. Language Awareness, 8(2), 63- 70.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Colby, F. M. (1941). Confessions of a gallomaniac. Retrieved April 18,</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>2014, from http://lektsii.org/3-38478.html</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. New York: Longman.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Giroux, H. A. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York, NY: Routledge.  </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Grace, P. (1987). Electric city and other stories. Harmondsworth: Penguin.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Guzula, X. (2011). Interactive reflective journal writing as a tool for mentoring and teacher professional development: A case-study. Unpublished master’s thesis. Faculty of Humanities, University of Cape Town, South Africa.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Halpern, D. F. (1999). Teaching for critical thinking: Helping college  </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 8, 69-74.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Hampton, M. (2010). Reflective writing: A basic introduction. Retrieved</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>July 12, 2014, from the http: www.port.ac.uk/media/contacts-and-</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>departments/student-supportservices/ask/downloads/Reflective writing---a-basic-introduction.pdf</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Hatton, N., &amp; Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49.  </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>Hawkins, M., &amp; Norton, B. (2009). Critical language teacher education. In A. Burns &amp; J. Richards (Eds.), Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 30-39). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>Johnson, K. E., &amp; Golombek, P. R. (2002). Inquiry into experience:</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Teachers’ personal and professional growth. In K. E. Johnson &amp; P. R. Golombek (Eds.), Teachers’ narrative inquiry as professional</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>development (pp. 1-14). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation>Karimvand, P., Hessamy, G., &amp; Hemmati, F. (2014). The place of</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>postmethod pedagogy in teacher education programs in EFL language centers of Iran. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 17(2), 59-91.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Khordkhili, S. R., &amp; Mall-Amiri, B. (2015). The correlation between school EFL teachers’ effectiveness and their narrative intelligence. Journal of Studies in Education, 5(1), 36-51.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Kok, J., &amp; Chabeli, M. M. (2002). Reflective journal writing: How it</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>promotes reflective thinking in clinical nursing education: A students’ perspective. Curations, 25(3), 35-42.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation>Koven, M. (2002). An analysis of speaker role inhabitance in narratives of personal experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 167-217.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. London: Yale University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R49">
			<label>49</label>
			<element-citation>Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R50">
			<label>50</label>
			<element-citation>method to postmethod. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.   </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R51">
			<label>51</label>
			<element-citation>Labov, W. (1997). Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R52">
			<label>52</label>
			<element-citation>Narrative and Life History, 7(1), 395-415.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R53">
			<label>53</label>
			<element-citation>Labov, W. (2010). Oral narratives of personal experience. In P. C. Hogan</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R54">
			<label>54</label>
			<element-citation>(Ed.), Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences (pp. 546-548). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Lakshmi, S. (2009). Journal writing: A means of professional development in ESL classroom at undergraduate level. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 5(2), 9-20.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R55">
			<label>55</label>
			<element-citation>Liaw, M. L. (2007). Content-based reading and writing for critical thinking skills in an EFL context. English Teaching &amp; Learning, 31(2), 45-87.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R56">
			<label>56</label>
			<element-citation>Lowe, G. M., Prout, P., &amp; Murcia, K. (2013). I see, I think I wonder: An</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R57">
			<label>57</label>
			<element-citation>evaluation of journaling as a critical reflective practice tool for aiding teachers in challenging or confronting contexts. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(6), 1-16.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R58">
			<label>58</label>
			<element-citation>Maarof, N. (2007). Telling his or her story through reflective journals.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R59">
			<label>59</label>
			<element-citation>International Education Journal, 8(1), 205-220.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R60">
			<label>60</label>
			<element-citation>Marsh, C. J. (2004). Key concepts for understanding curriculum (3rd Ed.). New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer. </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R61">
			<label>61</label>
			<element-citation>Maynard, S. K. (2007). Linguistic creativity in Japanese discourse:</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R62">
			<label>62</label>
			<element-citation>Exploring the multiplicity of self, perspective, and voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R63">
			<label>63</label>
			<element-citation>O. Henry. (1907). The last leaf. Retrieved April 18, 2014, from http://</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R64">
			<label>64</label>
			<element-citation>americanenglish.state.gov/files/ae/resource_files/the-last-leaf.pdf</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R65">
			<label>65</label>
			<element-citation>Reagon, T. G., &amp; Osborn, T. A. (2002). The foreign language educator in society: Toward a critical pedagogy. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R66">
			<label>66</label>
			<element-citation>Said, E. W. (1983). The world, the text, and the critic. Cambridge, MA:</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R67">
			<label>67</label>
			<element-citation>Harvard University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R68">
			<label>68</label>
			<element-citation>Shokouhi, H., Daram, M., &amp; Sabah, S. (2011). Shifting between third and</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R69">
			<label>69</label>
			<element-citation>first person points of view in EFL narratives. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 10(4),433-448.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R70">
			<label>70</label>
			<element-citation>Slattery, P. (2006). Curriculum development in the postmodern era (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R71">
			<label>71</label>
			<element-citation>Tang, R. (2009). Developing a critical ethos in higher education: What</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R72">
			<label>72</label>
			<element-citation>undergraduate students gain from a reader response task? Reflections on English Language Teaching, 8(1), 1-20.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>