<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2016.3746</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3746_b5016f08433a0ccd6ce3aeb13a8aa28e.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>Reflective Teaching through Videotaping in an English Teaching Course in Iran</article-title>
			        <subtitle>Reflective Teaching through Videotaping in an English Teaching Course in Iran</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Kavoshian</surname>
			            <given-names>Saeedeh</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>University of Isfahan</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Ketabi</surname>
			            <given-names>Saeed</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>University of Isfahan</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c3">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Tavakoli</surname>
			            <given-names>Mansoor</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>University of Isfahan</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>07</month>
			        <year>2016</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>35</volume>
			      <issue>2</issue>
			      <fpage>1</fpage>
			      <lpage>38</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>19</day>
			          <month>11</month>
			          <year>2015</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>25</day>
			          <month>06</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2016, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3746.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3746.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>The purpose of this study was to investigate videotaping as a strategy for EFL teachers’ reflective teaching. To this end, eight participants were selected from a language institute in Iran and were under investigation for over a period of one month and a half. The data were triangulated from different sources: videotaping; self-reflection sheets; and semi-structured interviews. The analysis of in situdata suggested that there is a significant difference between teachers’ self-evaluations of their own teaching process at the beginning and end of the semester. Results also demonstrated that the contents of reflective teaching can be summarized into a framework including eight categories of communication patterns in the classroom, the affective climate of the classroom, classroom management, error correction, teacher’s physical appearance, teaching techniques and strategies, professional development, and teacher’s command of English. The current study may have some enticing implications for EFL teachers, materials developers, teacher trainers and syllabus designers.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>reflection</kwd>
						<kwd>reflective teaching</kwd>
						<kwd>videotaping</kwd>
						<kwd>EFL teachers</kwd>
						<kwd>triangulation</kwd>
						<kwd>interview</kwd>
						<kwd>checklist</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Ahmadian, M. J., &amp; Tavakoli, M. (2011). Exploring the utility of action research to investigate second-language classrooms as complex systems. Educational Action Research, 19(2), 121-136.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Akbari, R. (2007). Reflections on reflection: A critical appraisal of reflective practices in L2 teacher education. System, 2(35), 192-207.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Akcan, S. (2010).Watching teacher candidates watch themselves: reflections on a practicum program in Turkey. PROFILE Journal, 12(1), 33-45.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Baker, T. E., &amp; Shahid, J. (2003). Helping preservice teachers focus on success for all learners through guided reflection. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Colleges for Teacher Education, New Orleans, LA.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Brophy, J. E. (Ed.). (2003). Using video in teacher education: Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 10). Greenwich, CT: JAI.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Brown, H. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th Ed.). USA, New York: Pearson Education.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English teachers. USA, New York:  Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Cochran- Smith, M., &amp; Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 249-305.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Copeland, W. D., Birmingham, C., de la Cruz, E., &amp; Lewin, B. (1993). The reflective practitioner in teaching: Toward a research agenda. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(4), 347-359.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Creswell, J. (1994). Research design: Qualitative &amp; quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. USA, Alexandria: ASCD.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Davis, A. (1970). Video-tapes in early childhood education. Education, 92(2), 79-81.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the reflective process. New York: Heath.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Doff, A. (2000). Teach English: A training course for teachers. UK: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Dymond, S. K., &amp; Bentz, J. L. (2006). Using digital videos to enhance teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 29(2), 98-112.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Fadde, P.J., Aud, S., &amp; Gilbert, S. (2009). Incorporating a video editing activity into a reflective teaching course for pre-service teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 31(1), 75-86.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Ferdowsi, M., &amp; Afghari, A. (2015). Audio-recording as a stimulus for reflection in teachers’ performance. International Journal of Educational Investigation, 2(6), 1-9.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Griffths, V. (2000). The reflective dimension in teacher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 33(5), 539–555.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Guidry, J., van den Pol, R., Keeley, E., &amp; Neilsen, S. (1996). Augmenting traditional assessment and information: The video share model. Topics in Early Childhood education. New York: Teachers College Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Harford, J., &amp; MacRuairc, G. (2008). Engaging student teachers in meaningful reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1884-1892.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Harford, J., MacRuairc, G., &amp; McCartan, D. (2010). Lights, camera, reflection: using peer video to promote reflective dialogue among student teachers. Teacher Development, 14(1), 57-68. Hatton, N., &amp; Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education. 11(1), 33-49.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Hewitt, J., Pedretti, E., Bencze, L., Vaillancourt, B. D., &amp; Yoon, S. (2003). New applications for multimedia cases: Promoting reflective practice in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(4), 483-500.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Ho, B., &amp; Richards, J. C. (1993). Reflective thinking through teacher journal writing: Myths and realities. Prospect, A Journal of Australian TESOL, 8(3), 7-24.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Hsu, P.Y. (2008). Using videotaping and reflective journal writing to improve student- teachers’ performance in classroom. Chaoyang Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(2), 97-120.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Huang, H.W., &amp; Hsu, P.Y. (2005). Reflective teaching through videotaping in an English teaching practicum course. Proceeding of 2005 International Conference and Workshop on TEFL and Applied Linguistics (pp. 210-216). Taiwan: Crane.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Huang, M-Sh. K. (2008). A case study of graduate teaching assistants’ reflections on their experiences of English language laboratory instructions, department English language, literature, and linguistics (Master thesis). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (No. 8853914).    </element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Jalilifar, A., &amp; Nattaq, F. (2013). Reflective teaching in the context of a video club: Nurturing professional relationships and building a learner community. International Journal of Society, Culture &amp; Language, 1(2), 51-68.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Kavoshian, S., Ketabi, S., &amp; Tavakoli, M. (2013). Self-evaluation through videotaping as an alternative mode of teaching supervision: A comparison of self and supervisor ratings. The Iranian EFL Journal, 9(2), 272-285.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. London/New York: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Kwo, O. (1996). Learning to teach English in Hong Kong classroom: Patterns of Reflection. In D. Freeman &amp; J. C. Richards (Eds.), teacher learning in language teaching (295-319). New York: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Lazaraton, A. (2001). Teaching oral skills. Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 3, 103-115.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Lee, G. C., &amp; Wu, C. C. (2006). Enhancing the teaching experience of pre-service teachers through the use of videos in web-based computer-mediated communication (CMC). Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(4), 369-380.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Lee, H-J. (2005). Understanding and assessing preservice teachers’ reflective         thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(6), 699-715.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>LeFevre, D. M. (2004). Designing for teacher learning: Video-based curriculum design. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (pp. 235-258). Amsterdam: Elsevier.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Liou, H. C. (2001). Reflective practice in a pre-service teacher education program for high school English teachers in Taiwan, ROC. System, 29(2), 197-208.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>Little, M. (2006). Preparing nursing students to be health educators: personal knowing through performance and feedback workshops. The Journal of nursing education, 45(3), 131.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>McLaughlin, D., &amp; Hanifin, P. (1994). Empowering the novice: Promoting reflection in preservice teacher education. Educational Research, 41(1), 63-77.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>Marsh, D. (1998). Comparing policy networks. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Marsh, B., &amp; Mitchell, N. (2014). The role of video in teacher professional   development. Teacher Development, 18(3), 403-417.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>McDonough, K. (2006). Action research and the professional development of graduate teaching assistants. The Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 33-47.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation>Murphy, J. M. (2001). Reflective teaching in ELT. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd edition) (pp. 499-515). Heinle &amp; Heinle, Boston, MA.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>Orlova. N. (2009).Video recording as a Stimulus for Reflection in Pre-Service EFL Teacher Training. English Teaching Forum, 47(2), 30-35.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Pacheco, A. Q. (2011). Reflective Teaching and its impact on foreign language Teaching. Revista Electronica Actualidades Investigativas en Education, 5(3), 1-19.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand         Oaks, CA: Sage.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>Perry, G., &amp; Talley, S. (2001). Online video case studies and teacher education. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17(4), 26-31.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation>Powell, E. (2005). Conceptualizing and facilitating active learning: Teachers’ video stimulated reflective dialogues. Reflective Practice, 6(3), 407-418.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Qing, X. (2009). Reflective Teaching- an effective path for EFL teacher’s professional development. Canadian Social Science, 5(2), 35-40.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R49">
			<label>49</label>
			<element-citation>Rich, P., &amp; Hannafin, M. (2008). Capturing and assessing evidence of student teacher inquiry: A case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(6), 1426-1440.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R50">
			<label>50</label>
			<element-citation>Richards, J. C. (1991). Towards reflective teaching. The Teacher Trainer, 5(3), 4-8.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R51">
			<label>51</label>
			<element-citation>Richards, J. C., &amp; Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R52">
			<label>52</label>
			<element-citation>Richardson, V., &amp; Kile, R. S. (1999). Learning from video cases. In M. A. Lundeberg, B. B. Levin, &amp; H. L. Harrington (Eds.), Who learned what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases (pp. 121–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R53">
			<label>53</label>
			<element-citation>Robinson, E. T. (1997). Applying the theory of reflective practice to the learner and the teacher: Perspective of a graduate student. Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, ED407394, Available at: http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED407394</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R54">
			<label>54</label>
			<element-citation>Robinson, L., &amp; Kelley, B. (2007). Developing reflective thought in preservice educators: Utilizing role plays and digital video. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(2), 31-43.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R55">
			<label>55</label>
			<element-citation>Rogers. S. F., &amp; Tucker, B. H. (1993). Video portfolios: Collaborations in literacy teaching assessment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the College Reading Association.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R56">
			<label>56</label>
			<element-citation>Schon, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books Inc.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R57">
			<label>57</label>
			<element-citation>Schratz, M. (1992). Researching while teaching: An action research in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 17(1), 81-95.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R58">
			<label>58</label>
			<element-citation>Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (2003), Using video in teacher education (pp. 1-28). New York: Elsevier.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R59">
			<label>59</label>
			<element-citation>Sherin, M. G., &amp; van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 475–491.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R60">
			<label>60</label>
			<element-citation>Song, K. H., &amp; Catapano, S. (2008). Reflective professional development for urban teachers through videotaping and guided assessment. Journal of In-Service Education, 34(1), 75-95.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R61">
			<label>61</label>
			<element-citation>Stanley, C. (1998). A framework for teacher reflectivity. TESOL quarterly, 32(3),                          584-591.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R62">
			<label>62</label>
			<element-citation>Sturges, M., &amp; Reyna, J. (2010). Use of vimeo on-line video sharing services as a reflective tool in higher educational settings: A preliminary report. In ASCILITE-Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference (Vol. 2010, No. 1, pp. 936-943).</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R63">
			<label>63</label>
			<element-citation>Taylor, E. (2002). Research in your own classroom. In, J. C. Richards, &amp; W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 397-403). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R64">
			<label>64</label>
			<element-citation>Thomson,W. S. (1992). Using Videotape as a supplement to traditional student teacher supervision. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 357 014).</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R65">
			<label>65</label>
			<element-citation>Tripp, T., &amp; Rich, P. (2012). Using video to analyze one’s own teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 678-704.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R66">
			<label>66</label>
			<element-citation>Wallace, M. J. (1991). Educating foreign language teachers: a reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R67">
			<label>67</label>
			<element-citation>Wang, J., &amp; Hartley, K. (2003). Video technology as a support for teacher education reform. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11 (1), 105-138.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R68">
			<label>68</label>
			<element-citation>Yanping, P., &amp; Jie, W. (2009, October). Research on reflective teaching and professional development of English teachers. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics San Antonio, TX, USA, (pp. 5194-5198).</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R69">
			<label>69</label>
			<element-citation>Zeichner, K. M., &amp; Liston, D. P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An Introduction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2016.3781</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3781_c863ff3d37e1432651c768656a9d8bff.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>Enhancing Iranian EFL Learners’ Descriptive Writing Skill through Genre-based Instruction and Metalinguistic Feedback</article-title>
			        <subtitle>Enhancing Iranian EFL Learners’ Descriptive Writing Skill through Genre-based Instruction and Metalinguistic Feedback</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Khatib</surname>
			            <given-names>Mohammad</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Department of English Language and Literature, Allameh Tabataba&amp;rsquo;i University, Tehran, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Mirzaii</surname>
			            <given-names>Mostafa</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Allameh Tabataba&amp;amp;#039;i University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>07</month>
			        <year>2016</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>35</volume>
			      <issue>2</issue>
			      <fpage>39</fpage>
			      <lpage>68</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>05</day>
			          <month>01</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>06</day>
			          <month>08</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2016, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3781.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3781.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>English language teaching (ELT) writing practitioners have long attempted to improve EFL/ESL learners’ competence in writing with recourse to either instruction or feedback. Likewise, researchers have, to date, mainly focused on either of these treatments to enhance language learners’ composing ability. Which treatment leads to more significant improvements is, however, unclear. Moreover, of the various written genres, the genre of description seems to have been neglected by researchers. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the impact of metalinguistic feedback and scaffolded genre-based instruction through consciousness-raising tasks on EFL learners’ ability to write descriptive essays. To this aim, two groups, feedback group (n = 32) and instruction group (n = 32), participated in the present study. After pretesting the participants’ ability to compose descriptive essays, the researchers provided them with either written metalinguistic explanations on their compositions or genre-based instruction. The participants then took a posttest, the results of which revealed that the instruction group had made more significant improvements.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>EFL descriptive writing</kwd>
						<kwd>metalinguistic feedback</kwd>
						<kwd>genre-based instruction</kwd>
						<kwd>scaffolding</kwd>
						<kwd>consciousness-raising</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Ahn, H. (2012). Teaching writing skills based on a genre approach to L2 primary school students: An action research. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 2-16.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Alcon Soler, E. (2007). Fostering EFL learners’ awareness of requesting through explicit and implicit consciousness-raising tasks. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 221-241). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Binglan, Z., &amp; Jia, C. (2010). The impact of teacher feedback on the long-term improvement in the accuracy of EFL student writing. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 18-34.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102-118.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Bitchener, J., &amp; Ferris, D. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and second language writing. New York: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Bitchener, J., &amp; Knoch, U. (2015). Written corrective feedback studies: Approximate replication of Bitchener &amp; Knoch (2010) and Van Beuningen, De Jong &amp; Kuiken (2012). Language Teaching, 48(3), 405-414.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Bitchener, J., &amp; Storch, N. (2015). Written corrective feedback for SLA: Theoretical perspectives and empirical research. London: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Carstens, A. (2009). The effectiveness of genre-based approaches in teaching academic writing: Subject-specific versus cross-disciplinary emphases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pretoria, South Africa, University of Pretoria.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Chaisiri, T. (2010). Implementing a genre pedagogy to the teaching of writing in a university context in Thailand. Language Education in Asia, 1(1), 181-199.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Crossly, S. (2007). A chronotopic approach to genre analysis: An exploratory study. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 4-24.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Daniels, H. (2007). Pedagogy. In H. Daniels, M. Cole &amp; J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 307-331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Derakhshan, A., &amp; Eslami, Z. (2015). The effect of consciousness-raising instruction on the pragmatic development of apology and request. TESL EJ, 18(4), 1-24.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Djiwandono, P. I. (2011). Applying consciousness-raising method to a writing class. Retrieved March 21, 2014, from http://litu.tu.ac.th/2012/images/litu/pdf/fllt_2011_proceedings-1.pdf</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Ebadi, E. (2014). The effect of focused metalinguistic written corrective feedback on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ essay writing ability. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(4), 878-883.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Elashri, I. I. (2013). The effect of the genre-based approach to teaching writing on the EFL Al-Azhar secondary students’ writing skills and their attitudes towards writing. Retrieved May 12, 2015, from          files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED539137.pdf</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (1993). Second language acquisition research: How does it help teachers? An interview with Rod Ellis. ELT Journal, 47(1), 3-11.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (2002). Grammar teaching: Practice or consciousness-raising? In J. C. Richards &amp; W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 167-174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (2009a). Corrective feedback and teacher development. Second Language Journal, 1(1), 3-18.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (2009b). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 2(2), 97-107.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (2010). Does explicit instruction work? National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics, 2(1), 3-22.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Ferris, D. R. (2004). The ‘grammar correction’ debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime...?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 49-62.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland &amp; F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81-104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Hendricks, M. (2010). Consciousness-raising and prepositions. English Teaching Forum, 2(1), 24-29.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Henry, A. &amp; Roseberry, R.L. (1999). Raising awareness of the generic structure and linguistic features of essay introductions. Language Awareness, 8(3-4), 190-200.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Henry, A. &amp; Roseberry, R. L. (2001). A narrow-angled corpus analysis of moves and strategies of the genre: Letter of application. English for Specific Purposes, 20(2), 153-167.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 148-164.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Hyland, K. (2009). Teaching and researching writing. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Hyland, K., &amp; Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39, 77-95.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Lantolf, J. P. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition: Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition, and artificial L2 development. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 73-94). New York: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Lantolf, J. P., &amp; Appel, G. (Eds.). (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood NJ: Ablex.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Lantolf, J. P. &amp; Poehner, M. E. (2013). The unfairness of equal treatment: Objectivity in L2 testing and dynamic assessment. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(2-3), 141-157.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Lee, M. (2012). Teaching genre-based writing to Korean high school students at a basic level. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin-river falls.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Liu, F. (2012). Genre analysis of American presidential inaugural speech. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(11), 2407-2411.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>Luo, J., &amp; Huang, T. Y. (2015). Genre-based analysis of American tourism brochures. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 200-208.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>Martin-Martin, P. (2013). The teaching of academic writing to English as a second language students: A functional genre-based approach. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 19, 329-351.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>Mitchell, R., Myles, F., &amp; Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories. New York: Taylor &amp; Francis Group.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Mohamed, N. (2004). Consciousness-raising tasks: A learner perspective. ELT Journal, 58(3), 228-237.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>Mohammadi, M. (2009). Recast and metalinguistic feedback in teaching and learning L2 writing: A comparative study. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 6(3), 227-244.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation>Na, D. E. (2004). Genre-based approach to teaching writing. Retrieved June 9, 2013, from ctl.intimal.edu.my/ictl2007...2B-02 Paper%2092%20</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>Narita, R. (2012). The effects of pragmatic consciousness-raising activity on the development of pragmatic awareness and use of hearsay evidential markers for learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(1), 1-29.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Nitta, R., &amp; Gardner, S. (2005). Consciousness-raising and practice in ELT coursebooks. ELT Journal, 59(1), 3-13.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Nueva, J. C. (2010). Genre-based instruction: Its effect on students’ news article. Retrieved June 12, 2013, from         http://www.fllt2013.org/private_folder/Proceeding/338.pdf</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>Poehner, M.E. (2012). The Zone of Proximal Development and the genesis of self-assessment. Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 610-622.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation>Read, S. (2010). A model for scaffolding writing instruction: IMSCI. The Reading Teacher, 64(1), 47-52.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Reppen, R. (2002). A genre-Based approach to content writing instruction. In J. C. Richards &amp; W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 321-327). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R49">
			<label>49</label>
			<element-citation>Richards, J. C. (2002). 30 years of TEFL/TESL: A personal reflection. RELC Journal, 33(2), 1-36.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R50">
			<label>50</label>
			<element-citation>Rose, K. R. (1994). Pragmatic consciousness-Raising in an EFL context. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 5, 52-63.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R51">
			<label>51</label>
			<element-citation>Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 159-168.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R52">
			<label>52</label>
			<element-citation>Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-83.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R53">
			<label>53</label>
			<element-citation>Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23(1), 103-110.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R54">
			<label>54</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M. (2010). Talking-it through: Languaging as a source of learning. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use/learning (pp. 112-130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R55">
			<label>55</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M., Kinnear, P., &amp; Steinman, L. (2011). Sociocultural theory in second language acquisition: An introduction through narratives. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R56">
			<label>56</label>
			<element-citation>Swain, M., &amp; Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320-337.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R57">
			<label>57</label>
			<element-citation>Thorne, S. L., &amp; Lantolf, J. P. (2006). A linguistics of adaptable signs. In A. Pennycook &amp; S. Makoni (Eds.), Disinventing language (pp. 21-37). Clevedon: Multicultural Matters.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R58">
			<label>58</label>
			<element-citation>Ting, S. H., Campbell, Y. M., Law, L., &amp; Poh, H. H. (2013). Explanations without a purpose? Genre-based instruction and academic writing. Journal of Academic Language &amp; Learning, 7(1), 26-39.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R59">
			<label>59</label>
			<element-citation>Troyan, F. J. (2013). Investigating a genre-based approach to writing in an elementary Spanish program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburg.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R60">
			<label>60</label>
			<element-citation>Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327-369.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R61">
			<label>61</label>
			<element-citation>Truscott, J. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 111-122.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R62">
			<label>62</label>
			<element-citation>Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337-343.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R63">
			<label>63</label>
			<element-citation>Tuan, L. T. (2011). Teaching writing through genre-based approach. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(11), 1471-1478.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R64">
			<label>64</label>
			<element-citation>Vengadasamy, R. (2002). Responding to student writing: Motivate, not criticise. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 2(1), 21-30.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R65">
			<label>65</label>
			<element-citation>Vyatkina, N. (2011). Writing instruction and policies for written corrective feedback in the basic language sequence. Second Language Journal, 3(1), 63-92.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R66">
			<label>66</label>
			<element-citation>Williams, B., Brown, T., &amp; Onsman, A. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 8(3), 1-21.                                                                                                                        </element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2016.3816</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3816_eb070d496699beac0af5e38371e178dd.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>Lexis-Based Instruction and IELTS Candidates’ Development of L2 Speaking Ability: Use of Formulaicity in Monologic Versus Dialogic Task</article-title>
			        <subtitle>Lexis-Based Instruction and IELTS Candidates’ Development of L2 Speaking Ability: Use of Formulaicity in Monologic Versus Dialogic Task</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Mirzaei</surname>
			            <given-names>Azizullah</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Shahrekord University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Hashemian</surname>
			            <given-names>Mahmood</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Shahrekord University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c3">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Azizi Farsani</surname>
			            <given-names>Mahshid</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Shahrekord University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>07</month>
			        <year>2016</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>35</volume>
			      <issue>2</issue>
			      <fpage>69</fpage>
			      <lpage>98</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>16</day>
			          <month>06</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>19</day>
			          <month>09</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2016, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3816.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3816.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>Although lexis research (e.g., Lewis, 1997; Taguchi, 2008) has already evidenced the possibility of teaching formulaic sequences (FS), further research is still needed to examine the procedures or frameworks through which the approach can be applied and probe the second or foreign language (L2) areas where it demonstrates more relevance. This pretest-posttest quasi-experimental study aimed, firstly, to compare the effects of intensive and extensive lexis-based L2 instructions on the development of IELTS candidates’ speaking performance and, secondly, to explore whether different types of speaking tasks (i.e., monologic vs. dialogic) have any differential effects on the frequency of using FS by L2 learners. To this end, three intact classes including 40 L2 learners preparing themselves for IELTS in a language center in Iran were randomly assigned to one control and two experimental groups. The groups received the same amount of instruction, however differently, two receiving intensive and extensive instructions in FS (or unanalyzed chunks) and the other receiving conventional non-lexis instruction. The results revealed that both lexis groups outperformed the control group pointing to the effectiveness of both intensive and extensive lexis-based instructions to the learners’ development of speaking proficiency. Moreover, the results showed no significant difference between the effects of intensive and extensive types of lexis instructions upon IELTS candidates’ development of speaking performance. Further, it was revealed that dialogic tasks were more conducive to the FS use than monologic tasks. Finally, the implications for L2 theory and pedagogy are discussed.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>formulaic sequences (FS)</kwd>
						<kwd>lexis-based instruction</kwd>
						<kwd>speaking performance</kwd>
						<kwd>unanalyzed chunks</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Anderson, J. (2000). Cognitive psychology and its implications (5th Ed.). New           York: Worth.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Bakhshizadeh, Y., Rahimi Domakani, M., &amp; Rajaei, M. (2015). The effect of           explicit instruction of formulaic sequences on oral proficiency           improvement of young Iranian EFL students. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 3(10), 44-52.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., &amp; Demecheleer, M. (2006).            Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research 10(3), 245-261.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Cullen, P., French, A., &amp; Jakeman, V. (Ed.) (2014). The official Cambridge   guide to IELTS. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and UCLES.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Corder, S. P. (1973). Introducing applied linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, N. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism, and language learning.            Language Learning, 48(4), 631-64.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, N. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The     emergence of second language structure. In C. Doughty &amp; M. Long  (Eds.), Handbook in SLA (pp. 63-103).Oxford: Blackwell.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Ellis, N. (2005). SLA the associative-cognitive creed. Paper presented at the 14th World Congress of Applied Linguistics. Madison, Wisconsin.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Hakuta, K. (1974). Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in  second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 287-298.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Keller, R. (1979). Gambits: Conversational strategy signals. Journal of          Pragmatics, 3, 219-237.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Krashen, S. &amp; Scarcella, R. (1978). On routines and patterns in language       acquisition and performance. Language Learning, 28(2), 283-300.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach. The state of ELT and a way forward. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Lewis, M. (1997). Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory into     practice. Hove, England: Language Teaching Publications.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Lewis, M. (2000). Materials and resources for teaching collocation. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation: Further development in the lexical approach (pp. 186-204). Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>McGuire, M. (2009). Formulaic sequences in English conversation: Improving         spoken fluency in non-native speakers. Unpublished M. A. Thesis,     Denton, TX: University of North Texas, Denton, Texas.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Mirzaei, A., Rahimi Domakani, M., &amp; Rahimi, S. (2016). Computerized lexis            based instruction in EFL classrooms: Using multi-purpose            LexisBOARD to teach L2 vocabulary. ReCALL, 28(1), 22-43.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language.     Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Nattinger, J. R., &amp; DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language      teaching. Oxford: Oxford   University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Pawley, A., &amp; Syder, H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native like          selection and native-like fluency. In J. Richards &amp; R. Schmidt (Eds.),      Language and communication (pp.191-226). London: Longman.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Peters, A. M. (1983). Units of language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Serrano, R., Stengers, H., &amp; Housen, A. (2014). Acquisition of formulaic      sequences in intensive and regular EFL programmes. Language      Teaching Research, 1-18.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Schmitt, N. (Ed.). (2004). Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and           use (Vol. 9). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Sinclair, J. (1991). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings.         Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Taguchi, N. (2007). Chunk learning and the development of spoken discourse in      a Japanese as a foreign language classroom. Language Teaching           Research, 11(4), 433-457.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Taguchi, N. (2008). Building language blocks in L2 Japanese: Chunk learning           and the development of complexity and fluency in spoken production.  Foreign           Language Annals, 41(1), 130-154.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Weinert, R. (2010) Formulaicity and usage-based language: Linguistic, psycholinguistic and acquisitional manifestations. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp.1-20). London: Continuum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Wong-Fillmore, L. (1976). The second time around: Cognitive and social      strategies in second language acquisition. Unpublished Doctoral         dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Wood, D. (2002). Formulaic language in acquisition and production: Implications for teaching. TESL Canada Journal, 20(1), 1-15.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Wood, D. (2008). Mandarin Chinese speakers in a study abroad context: Does          acquisition of formulaic sequences facilitate fluent speech in English.     The East Asian Learner, 3(2), 43-62.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency:           Background, evidence and applications. London: Continuum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge         University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Wray, A., &amp; Fitzpatrick, T. (2008). Why can’t you just leave it alone?           Deviations from           memorized language as a gauge of native like          competence. In F. Meunier &amp; S, Granger (Eds.), Phraseology in   foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 123-148). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Wray, A., &amp; Perkins, M. R. (2000). The functions of formulaic language: An            integrated model. Language &amp; Communication, 20(1), 1-28.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2016.3788</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3788_023f846444d913483a4d85b22f7932e5.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>The Impact of Training EFL Learners in Self-Regulation of Reading on their EFL Literal and Critical Reading Comprehension: Implementing a Model</article-title>
			        <subtitle>The Impact of Training EFL Learners in Self-Regulation of Reading on their EFL Literal and Critical Reading Comprehension: Implementing a Model</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Morshedian</surname>
			            <given-names>Mahboobeh</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>PhD Candidate, Payame Noor University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Hemmati</surname>
			            <given-names>Fatemeh</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Assistant Professor, Payame Noor University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c3">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Sotoudehnama</surname>
			            <given-names>Elaheh</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Associate Professor, Alzahra University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c4">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Soleimani</surname>
			            <given-names>Hassan</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Assistant Professor, Payame Noor University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>07</month>
			        <year>2016</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>35</volume>
			      <issue>2</issue>
			      <fpage>99</fpage>
			      <lpage>122</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>21</day>
			          <month>09</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>21</day>
			          <month>09</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2016, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3788.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3788.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>Self-regulation is the ability to regulate one’s thoughts and actions to attain goals. Accordingly, self-regulated learning (SRL) involves plans and behaviors to achieve learning goals. With this in mind, in this study we investigated whether training English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners on the basis of a Self-regulated Learning (SRL) model improved their literal and critical reading comprehension. The study also sought to find out whether the learners’ proficiency level could moderate the impact of self-regulation training. Two intact experimental groups were taught self-regulatory reading processes, while two control groups received the traditional, routine reading instruction. The data of the study were collected by College-Level Academic Skills Test (CLAST) reading sub-tests including both critical and literal reading comprehension parts. Statistical analyses showed that self-regulation instruction could significantly improve participants’ EFL literal and critical reading comprehension, but their proficiency level did not moderate the effectof self-regulation training. These findings can encourage EFL teachers to apply SRL strategies to reading tasks and activities.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>self-regulation</kwd>
						<kwd>self-regulated learning</kwd>
						<kwd>EFL literal and critical reading comprehension</kwd>
						<kwd>language proficiency</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. Modern Language Journal 75(5), 460-472.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Ammar, A. (2009). The effects of self-regulated reading strategy development on the prospective EFL teachers’ critical reading skills and reading motivation. Journal of Education &amp; Psychology (Aswan Faculty of Education), 1-33. Retrieved from http://repository.ksu.edu.sa/jspui/handle/123456789/4671</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Aregu, B. B. (2013).  A study of self-regulated learning strategies as redictors of critical reading. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(21), 1961-1965.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463–494.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Cambridge ESOL. (2003). Cambridge certificate in advanced English 5 student’s book: Examination papers from the university of Cambridge ESOL examinations (CAE practice tests). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Carrell, P. L. (1988). SLA and classroom instruction: Reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 223–242.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Chen, C. M, Wang, J. Y., &amp; Chen, Y. C. (2014). Facilitating English-language reading performance by a digital reading annotation system with self- regulated learning mechanisms. Educational Technology &amp; Society, 17(1), 102–114.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Cheng, E. C. K. (2011). The role of self-regulated learning in enhancing learning performance.  The International Journal of Research and Review, 6(1), 1-16.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Cleary, T. J., &amp; Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulated empowerment program: A school program to enhance self-regulated and self-motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41(5), 537-550.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Cummins, J. (1980). The cross-lingual dimensions of language proficiency: Implications for bilingual education and the optimal age issue. TESOL Quarterly, 14(3), 175- 187.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman &amp; D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd Ed., pp.191–226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Correia. R. (2006). Encouraging critical reading in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum, 9(1), 16-20.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Davis, S. G., &amp; Gray, E. S. (2007). Going beyond test-taking strategies: Building self-regulated students and teachers. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 1(1), 31-47.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Facione, N. C., &amp; Facione, P. A. (1996).  Externalizing the critical thinking in knowledge development and clinical judgment. Nursing Outlook, 44(3), 129-136.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Ferreira, P. C., &amp; Simão, A. M. V. (2012). Teaching practices that foster self-regulated learning: A case study. Educational Research eJournal, 1(1), 1-16.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Finkbeiner, C. (2005). Interests and strategies in foreign language reading: How pupils read and comprehend English texts. Tubingen: Narr.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Finkbeiner, C., Knierim, M., Smasal, M., &amp; Ludwig, P. H. (2012). Self-regulated cooperative EFL reading tasks: Students’ strategy use and teachers’ support. Language Awareness, 21(1–2), 57–83.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Fulcher, G. &amp; Davidson, F. (2007). Language testing and assessment. London: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Goldfarb, R. L., &amp; Johnson, B. E. (1992). CLAST preparation guide (3rd ed.). Lincoln, NE: Cliffs Notes.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Grabe, W. (1997, May). Teaching L2 reading: Moving from theory to practice. Paper presented at TESOL Academy, Seattle University: Seattle, WA.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Hashemi, L. &amp; Thomas, B. (1996). Cambridge practice tests for PET 1 student’s book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Housand, A., &amp; Reis, S. M.  (2008). Self-regulated learning in reading: Gifted pedagogy and instructional settings. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 108–136.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Huijie, L. (2007). An exploratory study of assessing EFL critical reading abilities: from specification to implementation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Huijie, L. (2010). Developing a hierarchical framework of critical reading proficiency. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(6), 40-54.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>James, Ph. L. (2012). Developing self-regulated readers. Unpublished master’ thesis. California State University, California.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Karlin, R. (1971). Teaching elementary reading: Principles and strategies. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Kobayashi, K. (2007). The influence of critical reading orientation of external strategy use during expository text. Reading Educational Psychology, 27(3) 363-375.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Kuiper, R. (2002). Enhancing metacognition through the reflective use of self-regulated learning strategies. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 33(2), 78-87.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Lynch, R., &amp; Dembo, M.(2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2), 1-14.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Maftoon, P., &amp; Tasnimi, M. (2014). Using self-regulation to enhance EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(4), 844-855.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Mbato, C. L. (2013). Facilitating EFL learners' self-regulation in reading: Implementing a metacognitive approach in an Indonesian higher education context. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>McLeod, B., &amp; McLaughlin, B. (1986). Restructuring or automatic reading in a foreign language. Language Learning, 36(2), 109-123.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Milan, D. (1995). Developing reading skills. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Molenaar, I., van Boxtel, C. A. M., &amp; Sleegers, P. J. C.  (2010).The effects of scaffolding metacognitive activities in small groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1727–1738.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Moos, D. C., &amp; Ringdal, A. (2012). Self-regulated learning in the classroom: A literature review on the teacher’s role. Education Research International, 1-15.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Mori, S. (2004). Significant motivational predictors of the amount reading by EFL learners in Japan. RELC, 35(1), 63-81.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>Nash-Ditzel, S. (2010). Metacognitive reading strategies can improve self-regulation. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 40(2), 45-63.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>Panadero, E., &amp; Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulated learning. Anales de Psicología, 30(2), 450-462.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>Paris, S., &amp; Paris, A. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36 (2), 89-101.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Phan, H. P. (2010). Critical thinking as a self-regulated process component in teaching and learning. Psicothema, 22(2), 284-292.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>Philips, A. N., &amp; Sotiriou, P. (1992). Steps to reading proficiency. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation>Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., &amp; McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity and reliability of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Pintrich, P. R., &amp; Zusho, A. (2007). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In R. P. Perry &amp; J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 731–810). New York: Springer.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Postman, R. D. (2009). Barron’s CLAST (3rd Ed.). Hauppauge, NY: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>Pratontep, C., &amp; Chinwonno, A.(2008). Self-regulated learning by Thai university students in an EFL extensive reading program.MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities, 11(2), 104-124.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation>Rheinheimer, D. C., &amp; Penfield, D. A. (2001). The effects of type I error rate and power of the ANCOVA F test and selected alternatives under non-normality and variance heterogeneity. Journal of Experimental Education, 69(4), 373–391.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Ruohotie, P. (2002). Motivation and self-regulation in learning. In H. Niemi &amp; P. Ruohotie (Eds.), Theoretical understandings for learning in the virtual university, (pp. 37-72). Research Centre for Vocational Education, University of Tampere.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R49">
			<label>49</label>
			<element-citation>Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and cognitive skill learning. In C. Ames &amp; R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 3. Goals and cognitions (pp. 13-44). San Diego: Academic.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R50">
			<label>50</label>
			<element-citation>Schunk, D. H., &amp; Rice, J. M. (1987). Enhancing comprehension skill and self-efficacy with strategy value information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 285–302.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R51">
			<label>51</label>
			<element-citation>Schunk, D. H., &amp; Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulated competence. Educational Psychologist, 32, 195-208.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R52">
			<label>52</label>
			<element-citation>Schunk, D. H., &amp; Zimmerman, B. J. (2007). Influencing children’s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 7-25.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R53">
			<label>53</label>
			<element-citation>Schwegler, R. (2004). Patterns of exposition (17th ed.). London: Person Education, Inc.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R54">
			<label>54</label>
			<element-citation>Souvignier, E., &amp; Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension.  Learning and Instruction, 16(1), 57-71.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R55">
			<label>55</label>
			<element-citation>Taylor, L, &amp; Weir, C. J. (2012, May, June). Automated approaches to establishing context validity in reading tests. Paper presented at the 9th EALTA Conference, Innsbruck: Austria.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R56">
			<label>56</label>
			<element-citation>Thistlethwaite, L.L. (1990). Critical reading for at-risk students. Journal of Reading, 33(8), 586-593.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R57">
			<label>57</label>
			<element-citation>Ustunluoglu, E. (2004). Language teaching through critical thinking and self-awareness. English Teaching Forum, 42, 2-7.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R58">
			<label>58</label>
			<element-citation>Varaprasad, C. (1997). Some classroom strategies: Developing critical literacy awareness. English Teaching Forum Online, 35(3), 24-37.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R59">
			<label>59</label>
			<element-citation>Wallace, C. (2003). Critical reading in language education. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R60">
			<label>60</label>
			<element-citation>Wegman, B., &amp; Knezevic, M. (2007a). Mosaic 1 reading.  (Silver edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R61">
			<label>61</label>
			<element-citation>Wegman, B., &amp; Knezevic, M. (2007b). Mosaic 2 reading. (Silver edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R62">
			<label>62</label>
			<element-citation>Wolters, C. (2010). Self-regulated learning and the 21st century competencies. Paper prepared for the NRC Planning Meeting on 21st Century Competencies.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R63">
			<label>63</label>
			<element-citation>Wolters, C., Pintrich, P., &amp; Karabenick, S. (2005). Assessing academic self-regulated learning. In K. Moore &amp; L. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 251–270). New York, NY: Springer.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R64">
			<label>64</label>
			<element-citation>Woolley, G. (2011). Reading comprehension: Assisting children with learning difficulties. New York: Springer.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R65">
			<label>65</label>
			<element-citation>Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-39.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R66">
			<label>66</label>
			<element-citation>Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R67">
			<label>67</label>
			<element-citation>Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H.Schunk, &amp; B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice, (pp. 1-19). New York: Guilford Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R68">
			<label>68</label>
			<element-citation>Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, &amp; M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation, (pp. 13–39).  Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R69">
			<label>69</label>
			<element-citation>Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-72.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R70">
			<label>70</label>
			<element-citation>Zimmerman, B.  J., &amp; Campillo, M. (2003). Motivating self-regulated problem solvers. In J. E. Davidson, &amp; R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of problem solving (pp. 233-263). New York: Cambridge University.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R71">
			<label>71</label>
			<element-citation>Zimmerman, B. J., &amp; Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R72">
			<label>72</label>
			<element-citation>Zimmerman, B. J., &amp; Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, &amp; A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299-315). New York: Routledge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2016.3782</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3782_a31ad3a4a21daec632e129e04855c0b8.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>On Anthropomorphism in Technology-Enhanced Language Learning: Does Modality Matter in Agent-Based Multimedia Instruction on L2 Idioms?</article-title>
			        <subtitle>On Anthropomorphism in Technology-Enhanced Language Learning: Does Modality Matter in Agent-Based Multimedia Instruction on L2 Idioms?</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Sahragard</surname>
			            <given-names>Rahman</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Department of Foreign Languages and Linguistics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Ahmadi</surname>
			            <given-names>Alireza</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Department of Foreign Languages and Linguistics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c3" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Babaie Shalmani</surname>
			            <given-names>Hamed</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Department of Foreign Languages and Linguistics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>07</month>
			        <year>2016</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>35</volume>
			      <issue>2</issue>
			      <fpage>123</fpage>
			      <lpage>160</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>02</day>
			          <month>04</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>11</day>
			          <month>07</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2016, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3782.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3782.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>The present study aimed to satisfy a twofold purpose: On the one hand, it sought to verify the postulation that agent-based instruction could offer a compromise approach to teaching L2 idioms where form and meaning would be equally emphasized during instruction. Given that anthropomorphism has not been much under scrutiny, this research, on the other hand, sought to ascertain whether learning and retention of English idioms would be differentially impacted when two different modalities of virtual tutors —anthropomorphic and non-anthropomorphic— were present in the tutorial. To this aim, the participants of the study received instruction on 128 English idioms from human teachers, a multimedia application featuring a humanoid virtual teacher, or a piece of multimedia courseware with a non-anthropomorphic virtual tutor. Analysis of the post-intervention measures of L2 idiom knowledge revealed that agent-based instruction had proved more effective in improving both learning and retention of the target idioms among the participants. A further finding was that despite the greater motivational benefits of the humanoid virtual tutor, it had not privileged the participants, performance-wise.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>anthropomorphism</kwd>
						<kwd>cognitive load</kwd>
						<kwd>modality effect</kwd>
						<kwd>pedagogical agents</kwd>
						<kwd>redundancy effect</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Abel, B. (2003). English idioms in the first language and second language lexicon: A dual representation approach. Second Language Research, 19(4), 329-358.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Allen, L. K., Crossley, S. A., Snow, E. L., &amp; McNamara, D. S. (2014). L2 writing practice: Game enjoyment as a key to engagement. Language Learning &amp; Technology, 14(2), 124-150. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2014/allenetal.pdf</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Ayres, P., &amp; Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 135–147). UK: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Babaie, H. (2008). On the effects of help options in MCALL programs on the listening comprehension of EFL learners. TELL Journal, 2(6), 27-47.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., &amp; Eyckmans, J. (2004). Cross‐cultural variation as a variable in comprehending and remembering figurative idioms. European Journal of English Studies, 8(3), 375‐388.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Bryant, F. B., &amp; Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm &amp; R. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99-136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Cambridge University Press. (2013). Cambridge IELTS 9: Authentic examination papers from Cambridge ESOL. New York: Cambridge.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Cameron, L., &amp; Low, G. (1999). Metaphor. Language Teaching, 32(1), 77-96.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Carlotto, T., &amp; Jaques, P. A. (2016). The effects of animated pedagogical agents in an English-as-a-Foreign-Language learning environment. Journal of Human Computer Studies, 90,1-32.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Cassell, J., &amp; Thorisson, K. (1999). The power of a nod and a glance: envelope vs. emotional feedback in animated conversational agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13(4), 519- 538.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Chapelle, C., &amp; Mizuno, S. (1989). Student’s strategies with learner-controlled CALL. CALICO Journal, 7(2), 25-47.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Chen, Y., C., &amp; Lai, H., L. (2013). Teaching English idioms as metaphors through cognitive-oriented methods: A case in an EFL writing class. English Language Teaching, 6(6), 13-20.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Clarebout, G., Elen, J., Johnson, W. L., &amp; Shaw, E. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents: An opportunity to be grasped? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 77(3), 267-286.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Collentine, K. (2001). Learner autonomy in a task-based 3d world and production. Language Learning &amp; Technology, 15(3), 50-67.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Corbeil, G. (2007). Using the French tutor multimedia package or a textbook to teach two French past tense verbs: Which approach is more effective? CALICO Journal, 24(2), 313-330. Retrieved from https://calico.org/html/article_647.pdf</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Dai, J., Raine, B. R., Roscoe, R., Cai, Z., &amp; McNamara, D. S. (2011). The Writing-Pal tutoring system: Development and design. Journal of Engineering and Computer Innovations, 2(1), 1-11.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Duffy, M. C., &amp; Azevedo, R. (2015). Motivation matters: Interactions between achievement goals and agent scaffolding for self-regulated learning within an intelligent tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 338-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.041</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Dunsworth, Q., &amp; Atkinson, R. K. (2007). Fostering multimedia learning of science: Exploring the role of an animated agent’s image. Computers and Education, 49(3), 677-690.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Ergül, E., &amp; Koç, M. (2013). The role of animated agents in web-based distance education. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 1016-1022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.189</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Graesser, A. C., Person, N., Harter, D. (2001). Teaching tactics and dialog in AutoTutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 257-279.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Grant, L. E. (2003). A corpus-based investigation of idiomatic multiword units. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Gulz, A., &amp; Haake, M. (2006). Design of animated pedagogical agents - A look at their look. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(4), 322-339.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Heidig, S., &amp; Clarebout, G. (2011). Do pedagogical agents make a difference to student motivation and learning? A Review of Empirical Research. Educational Research Review, 6, 27-54.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Heift, T. (2007). Learner personas in CALL. CALICO Journal, 25(1), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/cj.v25i1.1-10</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Hongpaisanwiwat, C., &amp; Lewis M. (2003) Attentional effect of animated character. In M. Rauterberg, M. Menozzi, &amp; J. Wesson (Eds.), Human-computer interaction-INTERACT '03 (pp. 423-430). Nieuwe Hemweg, Amsterdam: IOS Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Johnson, A. M., Ozogul, G., &amp; Reisslein, M. (2014). Supporting multimedia learning with visual signalling and animated pedagogical agent: moderating effects of prior knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(2), 97-115.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R27">
			<label>27</label>
			<element-citation>Johnson, J., &amp; Rosano, T. (1993). Relation of cognitive style to metaphor interpretation and second language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics 14, 159-175.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R28">
			<label>28</label>
			<element-citation>Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J. W., &amp; Lester, J. C. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 41, 41-78.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R29">
			<label>29</label>
			<element-citation>Laborda, J. G. (2010). Contextual clues in Semi-direct interviews for computer assisted language testing. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3591-3595.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R30">
			<label>30</label>
			<element-citation>Liew, T.-W., Tan, S.-M., &amp; Jayothisa, C. (2013). The effects of peer-like and expert-like pedagogical agents on learners’ agent perceptions, task-related attitudes, and learning achievement. Educational Technology &amp; Society, 16(4), 275–286.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R31">
			<label>31</label>
			<element-citation>Massaro, D. W., &amp; Cohen, M. M. (1994). Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influences in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1107-1128.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R32">
			<label>32</label>
			<element-citation>Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd Ed.). NY: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R33">
			<label>33</label>
			<element-citation>Mayer, R. E., &amp; Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R34">
			<label>34</label>
			<element-citation>Moreno, R. (2006). Learning in high-tech and multimedia environments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 63-67.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R35">
			<label>35</label>
			<element-citation>Nippold, M. A., &amp; Duthie, J. K. (2003). Mental imagery and idiom comprehension: A comparison of school-age children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 788-799.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R36">
			<label>36</label>
			<element-citation>Noma, T., &amp; Badler, N. I. (1997). A virtual human presenter. Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Animated Interface Agents: Making Them Intelligent. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R37">
			<label>37</label>
			<element-citation>Ozogul, G., Johnson, A. M., Atkinson, R. K., &amp; Reisslein, M. (2013). Investigating the impact of pedagogical agent gender matching and learner choice on learning outcomes and perceptions. Computers &amp; Education, 67, 36-50.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R38">
			<label>38</label>
			<element-citation>Paivio, A., &amp; Walsh, M. (1993). Psychological processes in metaphor comprehension and memory. In A. Ortony. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 307-328). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R39">
			<label>39</label>
			<element-citation>Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual (5th Ed.). NY: Open University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R40">
			<label>40</label>
			<element-citation>Reeves, B., &amp; Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, televisions, and new media like real people and places. University Press, Stanford, California.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R41">
			<label>41</label>
			<element-citation>Ryu, J., &amp; Baylor, A. (2005). The psychometric structure of pedagogical agent persona. Tech., Inst., Cognition and Learning, 2, 291-314.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R42">
			<label>42</label>
			<element-citation>Sahimi, S. M., Zain, F. M., Kamar, N. A. N., Samar, N., Rhman, Z. A., Majid, O., Luan, W. S. (2010). The pedagogical agent in online learning: Effects of the degree of realism on achievement in terms of gender. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(2), 175-185.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R43">
			<label>43</label>
			<element-citation>Sklar, E., &amp; Richards, D. (2010). Agent-based systems for human learners. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 25(2), 1–25.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R44">
			<label>44</label>
			<element-citation>Strauss, A., &amp; Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R45">
			<label>45</label>
			<element-citation>Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory from multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19-30). New York: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R46">
			<label>46</label>
			<element-citation>Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123-138.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R47">
			<label>47</label>
			<element-citation>Toyoda, E. (2001). Exercise of learner autonomy in project-oriented CALL. CALL-EJ Online, 2(2), Retrieved from http://callej.org/journal/2-2/toyoda.html</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R48">
			<label>48</label>
			<element-citation>Van der Meij, H., van der Meij, J., &amp; Harmsen, R. (2015). Animated pedagogical agents’ effects on enhancing student motivation and learning in a science inquiry learning environment. Education Tech Research Dev, 63, 381-403.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R49">
			<label>49</label>
			<element-citation>Vasiljevic, Z. (2015). Effects of etymology and pictorial support on the retention and recall of l2 idioms. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 12(1), 35-55.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R50">
			<label>50</label>
			<element-citation>Veletsianos, G., &amp; Miller, C. (2008). Conversing with pedagogical agents: A phenomenological exploration of interacting with digital entities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 969-986.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R51">
			<label>51</label>
			<element-citation>Yılmaz, R., &amp; Kılıç-Cakmak, E. (2012). Educational interface agents as social models to influence learner achievement, attitude and retention of learning. Computers &amp; Education, 59, 828-838.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R52">
			<label>52</label>
			<element-citation>Yung, H. I., &amp; Pass, F. (2015). Effects of cueing by a pedagogical agent in an instructional animation: A cognitive load approach. Educational Technology &amp; Society, 18(3), 153-160.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>
<article article-type="Research Paper" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
			  <front>
			    <journal-meta>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JTLS</journal-id>
			      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Shiraz University</journal-id>
			    	<journal-title-group>
				      <journal-title>Journal of Teaching Language Skills</journal-title>
			    	</journal-title-group>
			      <issn pub-type="ppub">2008-8191</issn>
			      <publisher>
			        <publisher-name>Shiraz University</publisher-name>
			      </publisher>
			    </journal-meta>
			    <article-meta>
 			      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10</article-id>
			      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22099/jtls.2016.3831</article-id>		
			      <ext-link xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3831_c748a4e008cdd76c63a4ac9644d8dc81.pdf"/>		
			      <article-categories>
			        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
			          		<subject>Research Paper</subject>
			        	</subj-group>
			      </article-categories>
			      <title-group>
			        <article-title>Diagnosing L2 Receptive Vocabulary Development Using Dynamic Assessment: A Microgenetic Study</article-title>
			        <subtitle>Diagnosing L2 Receptive Vocabulary Development Using Dynamic Assessment: A Microgenetic Study</subtitle>
			      </title-group>
			      
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c1" corresp="yes">
			          <name>
			            <surname>sarani</surname>
			            <given-names>Abdullah</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>University of Sistan and Baluchestan</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			       <contrib-group>
			       <contrib contrib-type="author" id="c2">
			          <name>
			            <surname>Izadi</surname>
			            <given-names>Mehri</given-names>
			          </name>
					  <aff>Chabahar Maritime University</aff>
			        </contrib>
			       </contrib-group>
			      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			        <day>01</day>
			        <month>07</month>
			        <year>2016</year>
			      </pub-date>
			      <volume>35</volume>
			      <issue>2</issue>
			      <fpage>161</fpage>
			      <lpage>189</lpage>
			      <history>
			        <date date-type="received">
			          <day>18</day>
			          <month>01</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			        <date date-type="accepted">
			          <day>21</day>
			          <month>09</month>
			          <year>2016</year>
			        </date>
			      </history>
			      <permissions>
			      	<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2016, Shiraz University. </copyright-statement>	
			        <copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
			      </permissions>
			       <self-uri xlink:href="https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3831.html">https://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3831.html</self-uri> 		
			      <abstract>
			        <p>The present study is an attempt to shed light on the effect of Dynamic Assessment (DA) on diagnosing and developing the receptive vocabulary abilities of upper-intermediate learners learning English as a foreign language. Fifty L2 leaners participated in the First Certificate in English test and completed Vocabulary Knowledge Scale. Out of 50 students, ten learners who were identified as being homogenous and were not familiar with the new vocabularies volunteered to participate in individualized tutoring sessions. Reading texts were used to make learners familiar with the target words and cloze passages were administered to assess learners’ receptive vocabulary. Mediation was provided using the interactionist approach to DA and learners’ responsiveness to mediation were studied in a microgenetic approach. The qualitative data were then coded in terms of task completion along with errors and struggles and transformed into quantitative data for analysis. The actual, mediated and transfer scores were reported to analyze learners’ Zone of Actual Development (ZAD), and the degree of the internalization of mediation. Findings of the study revealed that to have a complete picture of learners’ abilities, actual scores are not self-sufficient. Mediated scores are vital to diagnose learners’ areas of difficulties and to promote learners’ receptive vocabulary knowledge. The information from transfer scores also uncovers evidence of learning and data from Learning Potential Score (LPS) predict how learners probably respond to future instruction. Findings of the study indicate that DA is promising in presenting a fine-grained diagnosis of learners’ receptive vocabulary development while also suggesting information related to future teaching and learning.</p>
			      </abstract>
					<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
						<kwd>dynamic assessment</kwd>
						<kwd>mediation</kwd>
						<kwd>ZPD</kwd>
						<kwd>transfer</kwd>
						<kwd>Vocabulary development</kwd>
					</kwd-group>
			    </article-meta>
			  </front>
<back>
	<ref-list>
		<ref id="R1">
			<label>1</label>
			<element-citation>Ableeva, R. (2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in L2 French (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University. University Park, PA.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R2">
			<label>2</label>
			<element-citation>Alderson, J. C., Brunfaut, T., &amp; Harding, L. (2014). Towards a theory of diagnosis in second and foreign language assessment: Insights from professional practice across diverse fields. Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 236-260.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R3">
			<label>3</label>
			<element-citation>Alony, S., &amp; Kozulin, A. (2007). Dynamic assessment of receptive language in children with Down syndrome. International Journal of Speech-language Pathology, 9(4), 323-331.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R4">
			<label>4</label>
			<element-citation>Bengeleil, N. F., &amp; Paribakht, T. S. (2004). L2 reading proficiency and lexical inferencing by university EFL learners. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(2), 225-249.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R5">
			<label>5</label>
			<element-citation>Budoff, M. (1987). The validity of learning potential assessment. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 53–81). New York: Guilford Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R6">
			<label>6</label>
			<element-citation>Burton, V. J., &amp; Watkins, R. V. (2007). Measuring word learning: Dynamic versus static assessment of kindergarten vocabulary. Journal of Communication Disorders, 40(5), 335-356.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R7">
			<label>7</label>
			<element-citation>Cambridge English Language Assessment Center (2013). Principles of good practice: Quality management and validation in language assessment. Retrieved from http://www.cambridgeenglish.org/research-and-validation/quality-and-accountability/</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R8">
			<label>8</label>
			<element-citation>Campione, J., &amp; Brown, A. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An international approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82–115). New York: The Guilford Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R9">
			<label>9</label>
			<element-citation>Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., &amp; Hoffman, M., B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R10">
			<label>10</label>
			<element-citation>Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., &amp; Rynders, J., E. (1988). Don’t accept me as I am. Helping retarded performers excel. New York: Plenum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R11">
			<label>11</label>
			<element-citation>Kapantzoglou, M., Restrepo, M., A., &amp; Thompson, M. S. (2012). Dynamic assessment of word learning skills: Identifying language impairment in bilingual children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43(1), 81-96.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R12">
			<label>12</label>
			<element-citation>Kozulin, A., &amp; E. Garb. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension of at risk students. School Psychology International, 23(1), 112-127.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R13">
			<label>13</label>
			<element-citation>Kunnan, A., J., &amp; Jang, E., E. (2009). Diagnostic feedback in language assessment. In M. H. Long &amp; C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 610–627). Malden, MA: Blackwell.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R14">
			<label>14</label>
			<element-citation>Luria, A. R. (1961). Study of the abnormal child. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry: A Journal of Human Behavior, 31, 1–16.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R15">
			<label>15</label>
			<element-citation>Meara, P. (1980). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. Language Teaching and Linguistics, 13(4), 221-246.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R16">
			<label>16</label>
			<element-citation>Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic assessment of oral proficiency among advanced L2 learners of French (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University. University Park, PA.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R17">
			<label>17</label>
			<element-citation>Poehner, M. E., &amp; Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 233-265.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R18">
			<label>18</label>
			<element-citation>Poehner, M. E., &amp; Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment. Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 323–342.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R19">
			<label>19</label>
			<element-citation>Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., &amp; Lu, X. (2015). Computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing, 32(3), 337-357.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R20">
			<label>20</label>
			<element-citation>Schmitt, N. (2000).Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R21">
			<label>21</label>
			<element-citation>Shabani, K. (2014). The Effects of computerized instruction of vocabulary through hypertexts on L2 learners’ cognitive functioning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 868-873.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R22">
			<label>22</label>
			<element-citation>Sternberg, R., &amp; Grigorenko, E. (2001). All testing is dynamic testing. Issues in Education, 7, 137–170.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R23">
			<label>23</label>
			<element-citation>Taghizadeh, M., &amp; Bahrami, V. (2014). Dynamic assessment of Iranian EFL learners’ lexical inferencing ability: The interactionist approach. IJLLALW, 5(4), 310-321.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R24">
			<label>24</label>
			<element-citation>Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber &amp; A. S. Carton (Eds.): The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 1: Problems of general psychology (pp. 37-285). New York: Plenum.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R25">
			<label>25</label>
			<element-citation>Wolter, J. A., &amp; Pike, K. (2015). Dynamic assessment of morphological awareness and third-grade literacy success. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 46(2), 112-126.</element-citation>
		</ref>
		<ref id="R26">
			<label>26</label>
			<element-citation>Wesche, M., &amp; Paribakht, T., S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 13-40.</element-citation>
		</ref>
	</ref-list>
		</back>
</article>