Evaluating EFL Learners’ Philosophical Mentality through their Answers to Philosophical Questions: Using Smith’s Framework

Document Type: Research Paper


Shiraz University


Given the role philosophical mentality can fulfill in bringing individuals the essential skills of wisdom and well thinking, the present paper, by applying Smith’s (2007) theoretical framework, strived to explore the extent philosophic-mindedness exists among the participants. Considering the fact that, a philosophic mind begets philosophical answers, the participants’ philosophical thinking ability was evaluated through analyzing their answers to philosophical questions. To this end, through convenience sampling, a group of 40 EFL students in BA degree, 21 female and 19 male with the age range of 19 to 35, at Shiraz University, Iran, were selected. They were asked to read two simple short passages, story and non-story, and answer the related questions. Based on three characteristics of philosophic-mindedness (i.e. comprehensiveness, penetration, and flexibility) it was revealed that the majority of the participants signified rigidity and dogmatism in their way of thinking and were in the habit of shallow and superficial thinking. They seemed to be unable to afford themselves a profound insight into the questions. The minority, on the other hand, took notice of different options in the questions, reappraised their varying strands, and provided reasonable answers.  In addition, it was inferred that lack of comprehensiveness alone assures lack of philosophical mentality. Finally, the three dimensions of philosophic-mindedness recommended in the framework can be utilized by stakeholders in educational fields to realize a person with (non-) philosophical mentality.


Cam, P. (1995). Thinking together: Philosophical inquiry for the classroom. Sydney: Hale & Iremonger/PETA.

Cam, P. (2006). 20 thinking tools. Victoria: ACER Press.

Cambridge advanced learner's dictionary (2013). 4th Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dewey, J. (1983). Democracy and education. New York: MacMillan.

Fantasia, J. (2002). Drama and philosophy: Language, thinking, and laughing out loud! Applied

    Theatre Researcher, 9(5). Retrieved March 1, 2008, from      

Ghorbanalizadeh Ghaziani, F., Razavi, M., Khodaparast Sareshkeh, S., & Ghasemi, R. (2014). Preference of educational philosophy and philosophical mindedness of Iranian physical education and sport science lecturers. Annals of Applied Sport Science, 2(1), 81-86.

Gregory, M. (2008). Philosophy for children: A practitioner handbook. Montclair: Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children.

Harris, I. M. (2004). Peace education theory. Journal of Peace Education,1(1), 5-20.

Haynes, J. (2002). Children as philosophers: Learning through inquiry and dialogue in the

    primary classroom. London and New York: Routledge.

Hirst, P. H., Peters, R. S. (1970). The logic of education. The Student’s Library of Education: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Kennedy, D. (1992). Using Peter rabbit as a philosophical text with young children. Analytic Teaching, 13(1), 53-58.

Khosravian, E. (2018). Investigating the status of thinking and the factors affecting it among Iranian EFL students in graduate degrees (Unpublished MA thesis). Shiraz University, Iran.

Ladan and Laleh Bijani. (n.d.) In Wikipedia. Retrieved July 25, 2016, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ladan_and_Laleh_Bijani

Lipman M. (1993). Thinking children and education. Kendall: Hunt Publishing Company.

Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nded.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lipman, M., Sharp, A. M., & Oscanyan, F. (1980). Philosophy in the classroom (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2016). New Edition. Merriam-Webster, Inc.

Murris, K. (1992). Teaching philosophy with picture books. In J. Haynes, (Ed.), Children as philosophers: Learning through inquiry and dialog in the primary classroom (p. 137-138). London and New York: TJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornewall.

Nikkhah, A., M. (2008). The Philosophical mentality and its dimensions in teachers and sport trainers in the city of Golpayegan (Unpublished Master's thesis in Physical Education and Sports Science). Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran.

Nouri, Z. (2016).An investigation into the Iranian EFL students’ philosophical thinking ability (Unpublished MA thesis). Shiraz University, Iran.

Nouri, S., Fayyaz, I., Seif, A. (2013). Effect of philosophical mentality on solving Math problems by male and female third-grade students in Hamedan junior high schools. Thinking and Child, 4(7), 121-139.

Ofsted Inspection Report (1997). Wapping first school. In J. Haynes, (Ed.), Children as philosophers: Learning through inquiry and dialog in the primary classroom (pp. 137-138). London and New York: TJ International.

Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (2016). 9th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Potter, B. (1902). The tale of Peter rabbit. Retrieved from http://etc.usf.edu/lit2go/148/peter-rabbit-and-other-stories/ 4923 /the-tale-of-peter-rabbit/

Rand, A. (1982). Philosophy: Who needs it? New York: New American Library.

Russell, B. (1997). The problems of philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Schmuk, R. (1985). Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn: Basic concepts. New York: Plenum Press.

Seon-Hee, J. (2002). Literacy: Constructing meaning through philosophical inquiry. Analytic Teaching, 21(1), 44-52.

Shermis, S. S. (1967). Philosophic foundations of education. New York, N.Y.: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

Smith, P. G. (2007). Philosophy of education: Introductory studies. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

Splitter, L., & Sharp, A. M. (1995). Teaching for better thinking: The classroom community of inquiry. Hawthorn, Vic: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Talebpour, M., Hosseini, A., Jabari, H., & Jabari, M. (2008). Study and comparison of philosophic-mindedness of sports teams managers, coaches, and supervisors in Iran Universities. Research on Sport Sciences, 3(7), 109-130.

Vygotsky, L. (1984). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.