An Assessment Scheme for ELT Performance: An Iranian Case of Farhangian University

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 Tarbiat Modares University

2 kharazmi university

Abstract

Accountability concerns in language education call for the development of more valid and authentic measures of assessment. In light of these concerns, performance assessment has received increasing interest in the context of teacher education programs and teacher licensing over the last decade. In Iran, a recent policy adopted by Farhangian University aims at assessing the professional competencies of its ELT graduates by requiring them to go through a performance assessment as part of the licensing requirements. Mounting concerns regarding the validity of traditional tests used for teacher certification (Mitchell, Robinson, Plake, & Knowles, 2001) have motivated Farhangian University to develop its own performance assessment. Therefore, the present study explored the components of the performance assessment through detailed analysis of the Curriculum Document of the English Major, review of literature, and investigation of the stakeholders' perspectives. To this end, in this exploratory study, convenience, purposive, and cluster sampling procedures were used for the selection of the teacher educators, student-teachers, and mentor teachers. Then, in-depth interviews were conducted with the stakeholders. Finally, based on the content analysis of the above-mentioned sources which resulted in a strong agreement, a performance assessment scheme with seventeen items was developed. However, results of the factor analysis yielded a thirteen-factor performance assessment scheme to be used as the criterion for assessing the professional competencies of student-teachers.

Keywords


Akbari, R., & Dadvand, B., (2011). Does formal education make a difference? A comparison of pedagogical thought units of BA vs. MA teachers. Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 44-60.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. (2014). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.
Beare, H. (1989). The Australian policy context. Teacher appraisal issues and approaches. Austrailian Council for Educational Research.
Berliner, D. C. (2005). The near impossibility of testing for teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 205–213.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bunch, G. C., Aguirre, J. M., & Téllez, K. (2009). Beyond the scores: Using candidate responses on high stakes performance assessment to inform teacher preparation for English learners. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(1), 103–128.
Chung, R. R. (2007). Beyond the ZPD: When do beginning teachers learn from a high-stakes portfolio assessment? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. Retrieved from
Cizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. B.(2007). Standard setting: A guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests. UK. Thousand Oaks.
Clement, M. C. (2010). Preparing teachers for classroom management: The teacher educator's role. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 77(1), 41-44.
Cochran-smith, M. (2010). Foreword. In M. M., Kennedy (Ed.), Teacher assessment and the quest for teacher quality: A handbook (pp. xiii-1). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement20(1), 37-46.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift fur Soziolgie, JG, 19, 418-427.
Danielson, C. (2011). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Danielson, C., & Marquez, E. (1998). A collection of performance tasks and rubrics: High school mathematics. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional   practice. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: How teacher performance assessments can measure and improve teaching. Center for American Progress.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 523–545.
Delandshere, G., & Arens, S. A. (2003). Examining the quality of evidence in preservice teacher portfolios. Journal of Teacher Education, 54 (1), 57–73.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2004). Removing barriers to achievement: the Government’s strategy for SEN (London, DfES Publications).
DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Solution Tree Press.
Edwards, C. H. (1993). Classroom discipline and management. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
Ellett, C. (1990). A new generation of classroom-based assessments of teaching and learning: Concepts, issues and controversies from pilots of the Louisiana STAR. Baton Rouge: College of Education, Louisiana State University.
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. New York: Jossey-Bass.
Gasper, M. F., & Vieira, C. R., (2013). Plentitude teacher evaluation for teacher effectiveness and well-being with neuro-linguistic programming. US-China Education Review, 3(1), 1-17.
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gatbonton, E. (2008). Looking beyond teachers’ classroom behaviour: Novice and experienced ESL teachers' pedagogical knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 161–182.
Hatch, E. M., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. New York, NY: Newbury House Publishers.
Haertel, E. H. (1991). New forms of teacher assessment. Review of Research in Education, 17, 3–29.
Hamilton, L. (2003). Assessment as a policy tool. Review of Research in Education, 27, 25–68.
Hodge, K. J., & Morgan, G. B. (2014). The stability of teacher performance and effectiveness: Implications for policies concerning teacher evaluation. Education Policy Analysis Archive, 22.
Isoré, M. (2009), Teacher evaluation: Current practices in OECD countries and a literature review, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 23, OECD Publishing.
Jackson, C., Simoncini, K., & Davidson, M. (2013). Classroom profiling training: Increasing preservice teachers’ confidence and knowledge of classroom management skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(8), 30-46.
Koirala, H. P., Davis, M., & Johnson, p. (2008). Development of a performance assessment task and rubric to measure prospective secondary school mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and skills. Journal of Math Teacher Education, 11,127–138.
Kyriacou, C. (2007). Essential teaching skills. London, England: Nelson Thornes Ltd.
Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
McBer, H. (2000). Research into teacher effectiveness. A model of teacher effectiveness (Vol. 216). Research report.
McCormick, J & Shi, G. (1999). Teachers' attributions of responsibility for their occupational stress in the people's Republic of China and Australia. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(3), 393-407.
McGreal, T. M. (1988). Evaluation for enhancing instruction: Linking teacher evaluation and staff development. In Stanley, S. J., & Popham, W. J. (Ed.). Teacher evaluation: Six prescriptions for success. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
McKenzie, P., Rowley, G., Weldon, P., & Murphy, M. (2011). Staff in Australia’s schools 2010: Report prepared for the department of education, employment and workplace relations. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).
McLeod, J. (2003). Time and classroom space. In J. McLeod, J. Fisher, & G. Hoover. The key elements of classroom management. Managing time and space, student behavior, and instructional strategies. Association for supervision and curriculum development
Medley, D. M. (1982). Teacher competency testing and the teacher educators. Association of Teacher Educators and the Bureau of Educational Research, University of Virginia.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Mitchell, K. J., Robinson, D. Z., Plake, B.S., & Knowles, K.T. (2001). Testing teacher candidates, the role of licensure tests in improving teacher quality. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C.
Nouri, A. & Mehrmohammadi, M. (2011). A model for applying the grounded theory in educational research. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23, 8-35.
Navidinia, H., Kiani, G. R., Akbari, R., & Ghaffar Samar, R. (2015). EFL teacher performance evaluation in Iranian high schools: Examining the effectiveness of the status quo and setting the Groundwork for developing an alternative model. The International Journal of Humanities21(4), 27-53.
Ofsted (2006). The annual report of her majesty’s chief inspector of schools 2005/2006. London: The Stationery Office.
Pecheone, R., & Chung, R.R. (2006). Evidence in teacher education: The performance assessment for California teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(1), 22-36.
Peterson, K. D. (2000). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices (2nd Ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Prybylo, D. (1998). Beyond a positivistic approach to teacher evaluation. Journal of school Leadership, 8, 558-583.
Reeves, D. B. (2004). Accountability for learning: How teachers and school leaders can take charge. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., & Horn, S. P. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation.Journal of personnel evaluation in education11(1), 57-67.
Sandholtz, J. H. (2012). Predictions and performance on the PACT teaching event: Case studies of high and low performers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 39(3),103-126.
Selvester, M. P., Summers, D., & Williams, F. E. (2006). Costs and benefits of accountability: A case study of credential candidates’ performance assessment. Issues in Teacher Education, 15(1), 21-36.
Shinkfield, A. J., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1995). School professionals’ guide to improving teacher evaluation systems. In Teacher Evaluation (pp. 81-172). Springer Netherlands.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(4), 4-14.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology85(4), 571.
Skowron, J. (2001). Powerful lesson planning models: The art of 1,000 decisions. Arlington Heights, IL: Sky Light Training and Publishing.
Taut, S., & Sun, Y. (2014). The development and implementation of a national, standards-based, multi-method teacher performance assessment system in Chile. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22 (71).
Torgerson, C. W., Macy, S. R., Beare, P., & Tanner, D. E. (2009). Fresno assessment of student teachers: A teacher performance assessment that informs practice. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(1).
Whitaker, T. (2004). What great teachers do differently: Fourteen things that matter most. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (1987). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review, 57(2), 3-48.