Abdollahzadeh, E., & Salarvand, H. (2013). Book prefaces in basic, applied, and social sciences: A genre-based study. Journal of World Applied Sciences, 28(11), 1618-1626.
Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bhatia, V. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. New York: Longman.
Bhatia, V. (1997). Genre mixing in academic introductions. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 16(3), 181-195.
Bhatia, V. (2002). Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model. Ibérica, 4, 3-19.
Bhatia, V. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.
Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in PhD thesis introductions. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 57–75). London: Longman.
Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Cheng, W. (2009). Income/interest/net: Using internal criteria to determine the aboutness of a text. In Aijmer, K. (Ed.), Corpora and language teaching (pp. 157-177). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analyses for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dudley-Evans, T. (1986). Genre analysis: An investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of MSc dissertations. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Talking about text: Studies presented to David Brazil on his retirement (pp. 128-145). Birmangham: ELR.
Dudley-Evans, A. & Henderson, W. (1990). The organization of article introductions: evidence of change in economics writing. In A. Dudley-Evans, & W. Henderson (Eds.), The language of economics: The analysis of economics discourse (pp. 67-78). London: Modern English Publications in association with the British Council.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 3, 193-217.
Gamaroff, R. (2000). Rater reliability in language assessment: The bugs of all bears. System, 28,31-35.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.
Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7(2), 113–22.
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (1999). Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory course books. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 3–26.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Pearson.
Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research article. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 207-226.
Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091–1112.
Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 693-722.
Jalilifar, A. (2008). Generic and linguistic analysis of English and Persian blurbs. Greek Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24, 79-106.
Jalilifar, A. (2010). Research article introductions: Sub-disciplinary variations in applied linguistics. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 2(2), 29-55.
Kuhi, D. (2008). An analysis of move structure of textbook prefaces. Asian ESP Journal, 7, 63-78.
Kuo, C. (1999).The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 121-138.
Lindeberg, A. (2004). Promotion and politeness: Conflicting scholarly rhetoric in three disciplines. Turku: Abo Akademi University Press.
Martin, J. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J., Christie, F., & Rothery, J. (1987). Social processes in education: A reply to Sawyer and Watson (and others). In I. Reid (Ed.), The place of genre in learning: Current debates (pp.35-45). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Nwogu, K. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119-38.
Ozturk, I. (2007). The textual organization of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 26(1), 25-38.
Paltridge, B. (1997). Genre, frames, and writing in research setting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master’s thesis across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 55-67.
Shohamy, E., Gordon, C., & Kraemer, R. (1992). The effect of raters background and training on the reliability of direct writing tests. Modern Language Journal, 76, 27-33.
Sorayyaei Azar, A. (2012). The self-promotion of academic textbooks in the preface section: A genre analysis. Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 34(2), 147-165.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham, England: Language Studies Unit, University of Aston.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. (1995).The role of the textbook in ESP writing research. English for Specific Purposes, 14(1), 3-18.
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tang, R., & John, S. (1999). The “I” in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 523-539.
Thompson, S. (1994). Frameworks and contexts: A genre-based approach to analyzing lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 86-171.
Zepetnek, S. T. D. (2010). Towards a taxonomy of the preface in English, French, and German. Neohelicon, 37(1), 75-90.