Abdi, R. (2013). The effect of using hypertext materials on reading comprehension ability of EFL learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 557-562.
Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 269-298.
Anmarkrud, O., Braten, I., & Stromso, H. I. (2014). Multiple-documents literacy: strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 64-76.
Bernhardt, E. B. (1991). Reading development in a second-language. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Braten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2004). Does influence of reading purpose on reports of strategic text processing depend on students’ topic knowledge? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 324-336.
Braten, I., & Stromso, H. I. (2010). Effects of task instruction and personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts about climate change. Discourse Processes, 47, 1-31.
Braten, I., Stromso, H. I., & Britt, M. A. (2009). Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students’ construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 6-28.
Britt, M. A., & Sommer, J. (2004). Facilitating textual integration with macro-structure focusing tasks. Reading Psychology, 25, 313-339.
Capellini, S. A., Pinto, C. R., & Cunha, O. (2015). Reading comprehension intervention program for teachers from 3rd grade’ students.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174,1339-1345.
Carrell, P.L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. Modern Language Journal, 73, 121-133.
Carson, J. G. (2001). A task analysis of reading and writing in academic contexts. In D. Belcher, & A. Hirvela (Eds.), Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections (pp. 48-83). Ann Arbor: The Michigan University Press.
Carver, R. P. (1997). Reading for one second, one minute, or one year from the perspective of rauding theory. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1), 3-43.
Carver, R. P. (1998). Predicting reading level in grades 1 to 6 from listening level and decoding level: Testing theory relevant to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 121-154.
Coady, J. (1979). A psycholinguistic model of the ESL reader. In R. Mackay, B. Barkman, & R. R. Jordan (Eds.), Reading in a second language (pp. 5-12). MA: Newbury House Publishers.
Enright, M. K., Grabe, W., Koda, K., Mosenthal, P., Mulcahy-Ernt, P., & Schedl, M. (2000). TOEFL 2000 Reading Framework. TOEFL Monograph Series, MS-17. ETS.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goldman, S. R. (2004). Cognitive aspects of constructing meaning through and across multiple texts. In N. W. Shuart, & D. Bloome (Eds.), Uses of intertextuality in classroom and educational research (pp.317-351). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Goldman, S. R., & Bloome, D. M. (2004). Learning to construct and integrate. In A. F. Healy (Eds.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications (pp.169-182). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
Goldman, S. R., & Rakestraw, J. A. (2000). Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research Vol. III (pp.311-335). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F.L. (2002). Teaching and Researching Reading. London: Longman.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Pintrich, P. R., Barron, K. E., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 638-645.
Hessamy, G., & Dehghan, S. S. (2013). Construct validity of careful vs. expeditious reading. International Journal of English Language Education, 1(3), 223-243.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122-149.
Karimi, N., M. (2015). L2 multiple-documents comprehension: Exploring the contributions of L1 reading ability and strategic processing. System, 52, 14-25.
Karimi, N., M., &, Alibakhshi, G. (2014). EFL learners’ text processing strategies across comprehension vs. integration reading task conditions. System, 46, 96-104.
Katalayi, G. B., & Sivasubramaniam, S. (2013). Careful reading versus expeditious reading: Investigating the construct validity of a multiple-choice reading test. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(6), 877-884.
Khalifa, H., & Weir, C. J. (2009). Examining reading: Research and practice in assessing second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163-182.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1983). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363394.
Kobayashi, K. (2010). Strategic use of multiple texts for the evaluation of arguments. Reading Psychology, 31, 121-149.
Krishnan, K. S. D. (2011). Careful versus expeditious reading: The case of the IELTS reading test. Academic Research International, 1(3), 26-35.
Linderholm, T., & van den Broek, P. (2002). The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 778-784.
Mason, L., Scirica, F., & Salvi, L. (2006). Effects of beliefs about meaning construction and task instructions on interpretation of narrative text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 411-437.
Meyer, B. J. F. (1999). Importance of text structure in everyday reading. In A. Ram, & K. Moorman (Eds.), Understanding language understanding (pp. 227-252). Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Moore, T., Morton, J., & Price, S. (2010). Construct validity in IELTS academic reading test: A comparison of reading requirements in IELTS test items and in university study. IELTS Research Reports, 11, 1-89.
Narvaez, D., van den Broek, P., & Ruiz, A. B. (1999). The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 488-496.
Perfetti, C. A. (1991). Representations and awareness in the acquisition of reading competence. In L. Rieben, & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp.33-44). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Sentences, individual differences and multiple texts: Three issues in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 23, 337355.
Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J. F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of document representation. In H van Oostendorp, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99-122). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Plakans, L. (2009). The role of reading strategies in L2 writing tasks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(4), 252-266.
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Rosenfeld, M., Leung, S., & Oltman, P. K. (2001). The reading, writing, speaking, and listening tasks important for academic success at the undergraduate and graduate levels. TOEFL Monograph Series, MS -21. ETS.
Rouet, J. F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to web-based learning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. l. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Psychological and biological models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shim, S. S., Ryan, A. M., & Anderson, C. J. (2008). Achievement goals and achievement during early adolescence: Examining time-varying predictor and outcome variables in growth-curve analysis. Journal of' Educationa1 Psychology, 100, 655-671.
Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. Harlow: Longman.
van Steensel, R., Oostdam, R., & van Gelderen, A. (2013). Assessing reading comprehension in adolescent low achievers: Subskills identification and task specificity. Language Testing, 30(1), 3-21.
van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1081-1087.
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). The notion of macrostructure. In T. A. van Dijk, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Strategies of discourse comprehension (pp.189-223). New York: Academic Press.
Weir, C. J. (1993). Understanding and developing language tests. Hamel Hewpstead: Prentice Hall.
Weir, C. J., Green, T., Hawkey, R., Devi, S., & Unaldi, A. (2009). The relationship between the academic reading construct as measured by IELTS and the reading experiences of students in their first year of study at a British university,. IELTS Research Report, 9, 97156. British Council/IDP Australia.
Weir, C.J., & Khalifa, H. (2008). A cognitive processing approach towards defining reading comprehension, Cambridge ESOL: Research Notes, 31, 2-10.
Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73-87.
Zoghi, M., Mustapha, R., NorRizan, Tg., & Maasum, M. ( 2010). Looking into EFL reading comprehension. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 439-445.