Algi, S. (2012). Hedges and boosters in L1 and L2 argumentative paragraphs: Implications for teaching L2 academic writing. Published MA thesis, Middle East Technical University.
Ansarin, A. A., & Tarlani-Aliabdi, H. (2011). Reader engagement in English and Persian applied linguistics articles. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 154-164.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
Biber, D., Condrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., & Helt, M. (2002). Speaking and writing in the university: A multi-dimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 9-48.
Blagojević, S. (2009). Expressing attitudes in academic research articles written by English and Serbian authors. Linguistics and Literature, 7(1), 63-73.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: CUP.
Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. Beckenham: Croom Helm.
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse Studies, 4(2), 133-168.
Fu, X. (2012).The use of interactional metadiscourse in job postings. Discourse Studies, 14(4), 399-417.
Giannoni, D. S. (2008). Popularizing features in English journal editorials. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 212-232.
Gillaerts, P., & Van de Velde, F. (2010). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 128-139.
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. (2000).A modern history of written discourse analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 191-223.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context and text: Aspects of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (2001a). Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles. Written Communication, 18(4), 549-574.
Hyland, K. (2001b). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 207-226.
Hyland, K. (2002a). Directives: Power and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 215-239.
Hyland, K. (2002b). What do they mean? Questions in academic writing. Text, 22(4), 529-557.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 133-151.
Hyland, K. (2005a). Metadiscourse: Exploring writing in interaction. London: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2005b). Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173-192.
Hyland, K. (2005c). Representing readers in writing: Student and expert practices. Linguistics and Education, 16, 363-377.
Hyland, K. (2008a). Disciplinary voices: Interaction in research writing. English Text Construction, 1 (1), 5-22.
Hyland, K. (2008b). Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 8-18.
Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2009). The leading journal in its field: evaluation in journal descriptions. Discourse Studies, 11(6), 703-720.
Kaplan, R.B. (1987). Cultural thought patterns revisited, in U. Connor & R.B. Kaplan (Eds.) Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 texts. (pp. 9-21). Reading, M.A.: Addison Wesley.
Lakoff, G. (1970). Tense and its relation to participants. Language, 6(4), 838-849.
Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977).The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics,33, 159-174.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marković, J. (2013). Engagement markers in introductory textbooks. Communication and culture online, 5(4), 36-51.
McGrath, L. & Kuteeva, M. (2012). Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 161-173.
Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social interaction. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
Palmer, F. (1986).Mood and Modality. London: Cambridge University Press.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.
Shaw, Ph. (2000). The lexis and grammar of explicit evaluation in academic book reviews, 1913 and 1993. In Hyland K. & Giuliana, D. (Eds.), Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings (pp. 217-235).London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Swales, J. M., Ahmad, U., Chang, Yu-Y., Chavez, D., Dressen, D., & Seymour, S. (1998). Consider this: The role of imperatives in scholarly writing. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 97-121.
Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 58-78.
Thompson, G. & Thetela, P. (1995). The sound of one hand clapping: the management of interaction in written discourse. TEXT, 15(1), 103-127.
Webber, P. (1994).The functions of questions in different medical English genres. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 257–268.